similar to: [LLVMdev] reducing indentation

Hi I have checked all blocks, each block have a Terminator instruction and each blocks belongs to a function. I'm really confused. I guess the problem is caused by the removal of the Loop,The code is as follows: * //every block to header (except the ones in the loop), will now redirect to newblock for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(header); PI != pred_end(header); ++PI) {

On 12/17/12 10:34 AM, Alexandru Ionut Diaconescu wrote: > Hello, > > I am a beginner of LLVM. I am trying to move among the instructions of > a BasicBlock and I cannot. In this particular example, I try to get > the previous instruction of the end instruction. I am trying 2 methods: > > > > 1. I have the following sequence of code: > > bool

PS: I works when I use Instruction* prev = current->getPrevNode(); But then I have runtime error Stack dump that is very frequent... On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 6:20 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>wrote: > On 12/17/12 10:34 AM, Alexandru Ionut Diaconescu wrote: > > Hello, > > I am a beginner of LLVM. I am trying to move among the instructions of a >

On 11/23/2011 05:52 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 21:22 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: >> > On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 11:55 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: >>> > > Tobias, >>> > > >>> > > I've attached an updated patch. It contains a few bug fixes and many >>> > > (refactoring and coding-convention) changes inspired

Hi, Well, yes i did try your suggestion but i keep on running into a compilation problem. The error is: llvm[0]: Compiling Hello.cpp for Release build (PIC) /home/saraswat/llvm/llvm-2.1/include/llvm/ADT/GraphTraits.h: In instantiation of `llvm::GraphTraits<llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::BasicBlock> >': Hello.cpp:59: instantiated from here

for (BasicBlock::reverse_iterator I = BB.rbegin(), E = BB.rend(); I != E; ) { Instruction& inst = *I; ++I; <-- iterator should be advanced to the previous instruction // Happens to be an Instruction::SExt. // Works fine if I iterate forwards if (isInstructionTriviallyDead(&inst, TLI)) inst.eraseFromParent(); } Sorry for the inexperienced question, but

Dear developers: When I am doing basicblock pass, I meet a bug: there is an iterator "I" in a basicblock, and it is not pointing to the first instruction in this basicblock. However, "I--;" will fail by an assertion. The basic block ("I" is pointing to the second instruction) in test.ll: bb: ; preds = %bb1 %1 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias

Attached 2012/2/8 Marcello Maggioni <hayarms at gmail.com>: > Mmm, sorry, the patch I posted crashes if ExitBr is null (which it may > be ...) , this one should be ok (and passess all the ScalarEvolution > tests in LLVM): > > diff --git a/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp b/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp > index daf7742..b10fab2 100644 > ---

On 27 Sep., 05:45, hc2... at columbia.edu wrote: > Dear developers: >      When I am doing basicblock pass, I meet a bug: there is an   > iterator "I" in a basicblock, and it is not pointing to the first   > instruction in this basicblock. However, "I--;" will fail by an   > assertion. Hi hc! are you on SVN trunk? Cheers, Gabor > > The basic block

Well, it wasn't intended as a "real" patch to be included , but more as a "proof of concept" for a solution. Do you think it is a valid solution and I'm correct in my assumption? If so then I'll clean up the patch and attach a testcase for inclusion. Thanks! Marcello 2012/2/9 Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com>: > Your patch should include a testcase,

2012/8/25 Iaroslav Markov <ymarkov at cs.stonybrook.edu>: > Can't you do it by performing some analysis on CFG? You can traverse that structure with BFS. And after that for all the BB you have visited more than once, you try to find a parent that has a branch instruction as a terminator. Additionally you ensure that there are no BB with branches as terminators on your way. If such

AAAH! I see you are still at 2.5. Then this patch (the fix) is relevant for you: <http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/ADT/ ilist.h?r1=66061&r2=68785&diff_format=h> Cheers, Gabor On 27 Sep., 05:45, hc2... at columbia.edu wrote: > Dear developers: >      When I am doing basicblock pass, I meet a bug: there is an   > iterator "I" in

Your patch should include a testcase, see test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution for examples. "BranchInst* " should be "BranchInst *". You should have spaces after the // in your comments. One of the comment lines isn't indented properly. Nick On 8 February 2012 12:05, Marcello Maggioni <hayarms at gmail.com> wrote: > Attached > > 2012/2/8 Marcello Maggioni

Hi Pabhat, Have you checked out DepthFirstIterator? (include/llvm/ADT/ DepthFirstIterator.h). It provides an iterator abstraction to perform a forward/reverse DFS traversal of a graph. Many of the LLVM datatypes that represent graphs have a template specialization of the GraphTraits<> class which allows separate algorithms to treat them as graphs, walk them, etc. (Both BasicBlock

Can't you do it by performing some analysis on CFG? You can traverse that structure with BFS. And after that for all the BB you have visited more than once, you try to find a parent that has a branch instruction as a terminator. Additionally you ensure that there are no BB with branches as terminators on your way. If such parent exist, you mark that there is exist a direct connection between

This is the .ll for that graph (attached). I think I understand what you are saying. This particular testcase returns CNC not because the exit block doesn't have a unique predecessor, but because the unique predecessor (the inner loop block) has a successor that is inside the loop (in this case itself, because it's the inner loop block). That doesn't change, anyway, the assuption that

Hello, I am a beginner of LLVM. I am trying to move among the instructions of a BasicBlock and I cannot. In this particular example, I try to get the previous instruction of the end instruction. I am trying 2 methods: 1. I have the following sequence of code: bool patternDC::runOnBasicBlock(BasicBlock &BB) { ... if (BB.getTerminator()) { Instruction* current =

Hello everyone, I have a segmentation fault while running an LLVM pass. I need to use BBterminators array outside the iterating "for" loop for basic blocks. It seems that LLVM does not protect the addresses ( note: TerminatorInst *BasicBlock::getTerminator() ) when iterating through the loop, so I need to keep in BBterminators "Instruction" type elements, not

I would delete the Loop. I used the following code. cout << "begin to delete loop" << endl; for (Loop::block_iterator bi = L->block_begin(), bi2; bi != L->block_end(); bi = bi2) { bi2 = bi; bi2++; BasicBlock * BB = *bi; for (BasicBlock::iterator ii = BB->begin(), ii2; ii != BB->end(); ii= ii2) { ii2 = ii;

Duncan Sands <baldrick <at> free.fr> writes: > > Hi Anshul, > > > I am creating a pass that will pass loaded value by load instruction to an > > external function. > > I don't know how to do it.Please Help. > > your question is too vague for anyone to be able to help you. Add details, > for example provide the code for your pass. > >