Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] LoopPass symbol error"
2013 May 09
2
[LLVMdev] LoopPass symbol error
Thanks,
Also, every method inherited by LoopBase causes the same error, while Loop
methods go smooth.
On 9 May 2013 01:05, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On May 8, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Giacomo Tagliabue <giacomo.tag at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I am building a loop pass following these instructions:
>
2013 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] LoopPass symbol error
On May 8, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Giacomo Tagliabue <giacomo.tag at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> I am building a loop pass following these instructions: http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html
> Everything works fine, I did it many times for Function Passes, but in the runOnLoopmethod, whenever I call a method of the loop L passed as argument, for example L->begin(), I get the
2013 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] LoopPass symbol error
Wow, commenting those two lines worked out fine for me, thanks!
On 9 May 2013 09:34, Giacomo Tagliabue <giacomo.tag at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks,
> Also, every method inherited by LoopBase causes the same error, while Loop
> methods go smooth.
>
>
> On 9 May 2013 01:05, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 8, 2013, at 7:43 PM,
2013 May 01
1
[LLVMdev] undefined symbol for LoopPass
Hello,
I am building a loop pass following these instructions:
http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html
Everything works fine, I did it many times for Function Passes, but in the
runOnPass method, whenever I call a method of the loop L passed as
argument, for example L->begin(), I get the following error:
opt: symbol lookup error: /home/giacomo/llvmcsfv/Debug+Asserts/lib/Acsl.so:
>
2013 May 08
0
[LLVMdev] undefined symbol for LoopPass
Hello,
I am building a loop pass following these instructions:
http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html
Everything works fine, I did it many times for Function Passes, but in the
runOnLoopmethod, whenever I call a method of the loop L passed as argument,
for example L->begin(), I get the following error:
opt: symbol lookup error: /home/giacomo/llvmcsfv/Debug+Asserts/lib/Acsl.so:
>
2013 Apr 05
2
[LLVMdev] Z3 and loadable optimization
I created a loadable optimization following the tutorial at
http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html. I want to use the Z3 library,
installed in my system, in my optimization. When I include z3++.h (the name
of the library) in the code and use its classes, it compiles well, but when
I try to run it it says:
> opt: symbol lookup error: /home/giacomo/llvm/Debug+Asserts/lib/Acsl.so:
>
2013 Apr 05
1
[LLVMdev] Z3 and loadable optimization
I think I am in the first case, but I don't understand something, the -load
option during which command? opt? and which file should I load? libz3.so?
On 5 April 2013 15:32, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote:
> On 4/5/13 3:16 PM, Giacomo Tagliabue wrote:
>
> I created a loadable optimization following the tutorial at
>
2012 Nov 13
1
[LLVMdev] annotations for optimization?
Hello everyone,
As a research project we are trying to figure out how to insert some
annotations in the compiler in order to optimize the code. For example:
/*@ ensures x == 5 */
if(x>5){
{...}
}
where the comment is written in
ACSL<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI/ISO_C_Specification_Language>.
The example is trivial, but gives the idea, if LLVM is be able to read the
annotation, it
2013 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] Z3 and loadable optimization
On 4/5/13 3:16 PM, Giacomo Tagliabue wrote:
> I created a loadable optimization following the tutorial at
> http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html. I want to use the Z3
> library, installed in my system, in my optimization. When I include
> z3++.h (the name of the library) in the code and use its classes, it
> compiles well, but when I try to run it it says:
>
>
2013 May 08
2
[LLVMdev] How to avoid loopverify failures after replacing the backedge with an edge(latchBB to exitBB) in a looppass?
Hi,
I am writing a loop pass to replace the backedge with an edge from latch to
exit.
Now I just replace the terminator of latch with another BranchInst, and the
loop will not be a loop after my pass. However, it turns out a failure of
loopverify after executing my pass:
opt: ~/llvm/llvm-trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/LoopInfoImpl.h:297: void
llvm::LoopBase<N, M>::verifyLoop() const [with
2013 May 08
0
[LLVMdev] How to avoid loopverify failures after replacing the backedge with an edge(latchBB to exitBB) in a looppass?
On May 7, 2013, at 8:26 PM, zhiyuan yang <sjtu.yzy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am writing a loop pass to replace the backedge with an edge from latch to exit.
> Now I just replace the terminator of latch with another BranchInst, and the loop will not be a loop after my pass. However, it turns out a failure of loopverify after executing my pass:
>
> opt:
2005 Oct 04
1
very close but some small error
I'm attempting to install and run a program called ACSL (advanced
continuous simulation language) on wine.
So far the closest I've got is by installing
Wine 20050725
on my Ubuntu (Debian) Linux by using the latest
wine-config-sidenet-1.8.6
which appears to install ok and then installs the software ok.
However when I try to run it using
wine acslX
which should start it I get lots of code
2013 May 08
1
[LLVMdev] How to avoid loopverify failures after replacing the backedge with an edge(latchBB to exitBB) in a looppass?
Sorry for forgetting to reply all...
It works! Thank you very much!
But I also wonder how do you know this function will work while there are
no documents noticing that. I try learning LLVM by reading its code, but
soon feel lost in so many functions. Just like I have many tools, but don't
know which to use and what difference it could make. Is there some better
ways to learn LLVM?
On Wed,
2007 Nov 29
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM on MinGW
Antony Blakey wrote:
> SVN head LLVM and Clang built out of the box for me a week ago on
> MSYS/MINGW, using the following files:
Ok, I tried to do the same. The compilations stops with the following
error message (actually, I got to the same point in my attempt to build
LLVM with the MinGW compiler shipped with Cygwin):
llvm[1]: Compiling MachineLoopInfo.cpp for Debug build
2007 Nov 28
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM on MinGW
SVN head LLVM and Clang built out of the box for me a week ago on MSYS/
MINGW, using the following files:
MinGW-5.1.3.exe
MSYS-1.0.10.exe
msysDTK-1.0.1.exe
bash-3.1-MSYS-1.0.11-1.tar.bz2
bison-2.3-MSYS-1.0.11.tar.bz2
coreutils-5.97-MSYS-1.0.11-snapshot.tar.bz2
flex-2.5.33-MSYS-1.0.11.tar.bz2
gawk-3.1.5-MSYS-1.0.11-snapshot.tar.bz2
regex-0.12-MSYS-1.0.11.tar.bz2
1. install these components
2.
2013 Apr 25
2
[LLVMdev] How to know if an instruction is "usable"
Thanks,
So, how do I check if a block dominates another one?
On 25 April 2013 11:59, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 4/25/2013 11:52 AM, Giacomo Tagliabue wrote:
>
>> Is there an easy way to know if, at a certain instruction, a certain
>> value is usable or not? i.e., I am sure that if i use that value i don't
>> to get the error
2007 Nov 28
5
[LLVMdev] LLVM on MinGW
Hello,
I'm trying to use LLVM on Windows, using the MinGW toolchain that comes
with Cygwin (gcc -mno-cygwin, not the standalone msys package). Has
anyone successfully built LLVM from sources with this toolchain?
The ./configure scripts automatically detects a Cygwin environment. I've
spent some time trying to let it know that it should compile for MinGW.
FWIW, here's what I've
2013 Apr 25
2
[LLVMdev] How to know if an instruction is "usable"
Is there an easy way to know if, at a certain instruction, a certain value
is usable or not? i.e., I am sure that if i use that value i don't to get
the error "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
Thanks,
GT
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130425/477fc259/attachment.html>
2013 Apr 14
2
[LLVMdev] source - target code of a pass
Hello,
I want to compare a program before and after having run a FunctionPass. The
purpose is merely didactic. What I would like to do is, during the
runOnFunction() method, "save" somehow the instruction set and cfg of the
function, run the optimization. and then compare the two codes, before and
after the transformation.
Is there an automatic way tho do that, or a suggested approach?
2010 Jan 08
1
[LLVMdev] Make LoopBase inherit from "RegionBase"?
On 01/08/10 14:20, ether wrote:
> sorry that i forgot to change the subjuect
Hi ether,
sounds interesting. Actually is/may be some kind of region. If you want
you can have a look at the analysis, that I wrote. It is not yet
finished, not completely documented and work in progress. However the
first big comment might be interesting for you. Or seeing the results of
opt -regions -analyze