similar to: [LLVMdev] [Reminder] 3.3 Patches

how to get this branch? still svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk llvm? Thank you. On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > We branched for the 3.1 release! (Yay!) > > If there are any fixes which you think should go into the release, please > contact the code owners

Hi all, We branched for the 3.1 release! (Yay!) If there are any fixes which you think should go into the release, please contact the code owners (http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#owners) so that they can approve the patches. No patches will be accepted into the 3.1 release without prior approval! This should be a great release! :-) -bw

Not yet. That is, I don't think any have been filed at all for 3.0. I don't know whether to be happy or worried. :-) Any that are regressions should be marked with the 'regression' keyword and be a release blocker. -bw On Oct 20, 2011, at 8:40 AM, Jim Grosbach wrote: > Hi Bill, > > Do we have a list of which PRs have been filed that are considered release blockers?

What was the revision the branch was made from? On Apr 16, 2012, at 11:16 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > We branched for the 3.1 release! (Yay!) > > If there are any fixes which you think should go into the release, please contact the code owners (http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#owners) so that they can approve the patches. No

On 6 Feb 2013, at 07:50, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Feb 4, 2013, at 11:54 PM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > >> On 5 Feb 2013, at 01:32, Bill Wendling wrote: >> >>> No. It hasn't been written up. We typically don't do write-ups for API changes. However, we do list the thing we do change in the ReleaseNotes (these changes

The LLVM 2.8 branches have been created! We will be conducting several rounds of testing of this branch during September. See http://llvm.org/ for a tentative schedule. What this means for you As I mentioned in a previous e-mail, the branch is still open for code submissions. However there are a few rules that we need to adhere to: No new features are allowed, no matter how trivial they may be.

Hi Bill, Do we have a list of which PRs have been filed that are considered release blockers? -Jim On Oct 17, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > Hi all, > > Testing for LLVM 3.0 release candidate 1 is now under way! We will soon have binaries available for you to download and try. Those who would like to compile things and try them out for themselves can grab the source

Hi all, Testing for LLVM 3.0 release candidate 1 is now under way! We will soon have binaries available for you to download and try. Those who would like to compile things and try them out for themselves can grab the source tarballs here: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/ A Word About Patches I neglected to send out instructions on how to get patches into the LLVM 3.0 branch. All patches must

LLVMers, The LLVM 2.2 release code freeze and branch creation is less than 1 month away. All major changes should be commited to svn at least 1 week before the code freeze. As a reminder, here is the complete release schedule (which can also be found on the main page in the right sidebar): Jan 16, 2008: Branch creation/Code Freeze (9PM PST). Jan 18, 2008: First round of pre-release testing

LLVMers, The 2.1 code freeze and branch creation is next Wednesday, September 12th at 9PM PDT. At this point in time, any major changes should be checked in. You are free to still commit changes to the tree, but please be extra cautious in what you commit and monitor the testers on platforms you are not able to test on. We would like things to remain as stable as possible up until the code

LLVMers, I just wanted to remind everyone that the 2.2 pre-release testing (round 1) ends tomorrow (2/1/08 midnight). Please send your test results to the list by that deadline. Thanks to all who have tested the release so far! -Tanya

This is just a reminder that the 3.5 release will be starting up in July. Most likely the 2nd week. Details will come later. But you can help things along. * Be sure to update the READMEs! * Try to get your new features in good working condition. * Tackle some of the bugs in the bugzilla. Focus on mis-compilations. * And update the READMEs!! Share and enjoy! -bw

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:38 AM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 2, 2008, at 10:11 PM, Xuehai Qian wrote: > > Hi LLVMers, > > I am a PHD student in CS dept in UIUC, I am doing a project for > > Vikram's course, it is about PRE. I would like to know why you didn't > > choose SSAPRE in LLVM, since it seems to be more suitable for

On Feb 4, 2013, at 11:54 PM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > On 5 Feb 2013, at 01:32, Bill Wendling wrote: > >> No. It hasn't been written up. We typically don't do write-ups for API changes. However, we do list the thing we do change in the ReleaseNotes (these changes haven't made it there though). > > The attributes API has

Hi Bill, Will the 2.9 branch be reflected in the git mirrors? Thanks, Chad On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > This is a reminder that we will be branching for LLVM 2.9 in one week! > 07:00:00 p.m. Sunday March 6, 2011 PST / 03:00:00 a.m. Monday March 7, 2011 > GMT > What this means for you: > Please keep a watch on all of your

This is just a reminder to say that we will be branching for the LLVM 3.0 release Friday! 07:00:00 p.m. Friday October 14, 2011 PDT 02:00:00 a.m. Saturday October 15, 2011 GMT Now is the time to look at the buildbots and see what fixes they need: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/console As of this writing, we have: • several test failures on llvm-gcc self-host:

On Oct 14, 2011, at 12:54 PM, David A. Greene wrote: > greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > >> I have some pending patches for 3.0 only. > > Of course I meant post-3.0 only. > Yes, I'll send out a message when it's okay to submit post-3.0 patches. -bw

This is a reminder that we will be branching for LLVM 2.9 in one week! 07:00:00 p.m. Sunday March 6, 2011 PST / 03:00:00 a.m. Monday March 7, 2011 GMT What this means for you: Please keep a watch on all of your patches going into mainline. And pay close attention to the buildbots and fix any issues quickly. Also, please try to finish up any last minute feature work. While it won't be the

On Apr 2, 2008, at 10:11 PM, Xuehai Qian wrote: > Hi LLVMers, > I am a PHD student in CS dept in UIUC, I am doing a project for > Vikram's course, it is about PRE. I would like to know why you didn't > choose SSAPRE in LLVM, since it seems to be more suitable for LLVM (it > can operate directly on SSA form and avoid the conversion between SSA > and bit-vector). Can

On Feb 23, 2009, at 8:40 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > For those of you who haven't noticed, I'm planning to commit a major > change to the Makefile rules tomorrow evening (Tuesday) if there are > no complaints about it between now and then. > > This needs testing on Darwin. I've heard back from Linux on many > platforms and even FreeBSD, which is fantastic, but