similar to: [LLVMdev] gsoc 2013

Hello, I’m an undergraduate student studying CS in the South China University of Technology. I have been using clang compiler and related tools since I started studying C++ and I would like to work on LLVM in this year’s GSoC. I am interested in “Implement a single updater class for Dominators”. [1] I have achieved a bronze medal in the 2017 ACM-ICPC Asia Xian Regional Contest [2] (being a

Hi Chijun, Thanks for your interest in the project. I have gone through most of the LLVM Kaleidoscope tutorial and I have > watched the video of the presentation “Dominator Trees and incremental > updates that transcend time” presented on the 2017 LLVM Developers’ > Meeting. I have also started to understand the algorithm mentioned in > the comments of the code related to the

Hello, I’m an undergraduate student studying CS in the South China University of Technology. I have been using clang compiler and related tools since I started studying C++ and I would like to work on LLVM in this year’s GSoC. I am interested in “Implement a single updater class for Dominators”. [1] I have achieved a bronze medal in the 2017 ACM-ICPC Asia Xian Regional Contest [2] (being a

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Yun-Wei Lee <lee2041412 at gmail.com> wrote: > Thank for your suggestion. > > I have tried to use GetAlignedArgumentStackSize. > It is so strange that this function may output uncorrectly. > For example, the StackSize will be 40 when handling the third function call > in main. > If I modified the this function, it will fail one test.

Hi Kuba, Thanks for your advice in your previous letter. During last week, I have read the documents on Doxygen and the source code of the DomTreeBase/DomTree/PostDomTree/DeferredDominance class, I believe now I have a much better understanding on the relationship between these classes and how DeferredDominance class performs lazy updates. I have also learnt the current usage and drawbacks of

Hi Chijun, Great, seems like you did a lot of progress and understand the issues quite well! I have done some early sketch on the API of the new updater class. > From my current understanding, to solve the fragmentation problem of > the API, the new class first, need to maintain the DomTree and > PostDomTree class and deprecate the DefferredDominance class. > There are a couple of

Hi Chijun, I left you my feedback in the doc (+ some nitpicks). Overall, it looks very solid and shows you understand the problem well and know what to expect. Your proposed timeline is reasonable and I don't see any major things to improve there. Don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions related to my comments (either here or in the document). Thanks, Kuba On Wed, Mar 21,

Hi Kuba, Thanks for your clarification on the project in the previous letter. I have submitted a proposal draft at the GSoC website, the draft has been shared with the LLVM organization. I will appreciate it if you can give me some advice on the proposal. This draft can be viewed by the organization. (If you do not have access, please mail me, and I will give you the link.) I am looking forward

Hi Kuba, Thanks for your feedback. I have made some improvements on the proposal according to your feedback and clarify something on the time availability. I left comments on the questions you asked in the doc. Please check it out. Thanks, Chijun 2018-03-22 10:37 GMT+08:00 Jakub (Kuba) Kuderski <kubakuderski at gmail.com>: > Hi Chijun, > > I left you my feedback in the doc (+

Hello, My name is Santiago Pina and I am currently studying two BSc(Hon) simultaneously ; one in Computer Science and the other in Mathematics as part of a pilot project at Universidad de Murcia. I am very excited to contribute in open source community through the platform of Google Summer of Code 2011. I was interested in the Weighting Schemes project and in the Matcher Optimisations project,

http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14792 Problem: In the i386 ABI Page 3-10, it said that the stack is aligned. However, the two example code show that does not handle the alignment correctly when using variadic function. For example, if the size of the first argument is 17, the overflow_arg_area in va_list will be set to "address of first argument + 16" instead of "address of

Hi, I'm encountering trouble compiling caTools_1.17.1.tar.gz and e1071_1.6-4.tar.gz on a Linux system using the Intel compiler suite. 14 other packages I generally use installed without any trouble. I notice both of these trouble packages have a C++ component, so I wonder if that might be the issue. Below, there's information on my platform, compiler, and some diagnostic output showing

Hi Martyn, Thanks for your insight, that seems pretty direct. Unfortunately, I did not compile this version of R (it's on a large supercomputer system and this version of R was installed by the admins). Using "R CMD config", I see the following relevant settings: DYLIB_LD = icc -std=gnu99 DYLIB_LDFLAGS = -shared -openmp LDFLAGS = -L/opt/compilers/intel/cce/9.1.039/lib

posting the question in r-help@ to get more feedback :-) thanks, Yun-Fang ----- Original Message ----- From: "Yun-Fang Juan" <yunfang at yahoo-inc.com> To: <s-news at wubios.wustl.edu> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 2:04 PM Subject: [S] plot stacked bar chart in R > Hi, > I am trying to plot a stacked bar chart in R but am not able to find the > documentation.

Let me add that when not specifying the '--host' option, the whole thing fails as well: ../llvm/configure CXX=icpc CC=icc CXXFLAGS="-O3 -mmic" CFLAGS="-O3 -mmic" checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... configure: error: cannot run C compiled programs. If you meant to cross compile, use `--host'. Frank

Full_Name: Dong-Yun Kim Version: 1.7.0/1.8.1 OS: WinMe/WinXP Submission from: (NULL) (4.33.147.192) Hi all, It appears that R has a problem with evaluating logical "==" operator. The following are a few examples I found: > 2.1+0.2==2.3 [1] FALSE > 2.7+0.1==2.8 [1] FALSE > 2.7+0.2==2.9 [1] FALSE > 3.1+0.2==3.3 [1] FALSE Thanks. Dong-Yun Kim

Hi, I am trying to build LLVM 3.4 RC1 with the Intel compiler targeting the Xeon Phi (native). In order to skip the building and execution of a test binary during configuration one needs the set the "-host" option indicating a cross compilation. Intel suggests to use "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu". However, either using "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" or something

Hello, I have install Horde rpm with webmin: Instalando paquete(s) con el comando yum -y install yun grouinstall horde ... Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: centos.intergenia.de * epel: ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de * extras: centos.intergenia.de * updates: ftp.belnet.be Setting up Install Process No package yun available. No package grouinstall

Guys, OK, now that we have the new core contributors squared away, we can go back to finishing the contributors list. There were some people who got added and then there is existing contributors list. I think Darren''s suggestion to wait to add new core contributors is fine (let the new constitution settle down and we can in the meanwhile have a more inclusive look at both rather than

Hi, I try to use lm to fit a linear model with 600k rows and 70 attributes. But I can't even load the data into the R environment. The error message says the vector memory is used up. Is there anyone having experience with large datasets in R? (I bet) Please advise. thanks, Yun-Fang [[alternative HTML version deleted]]