similar to: [LLVMdev] [Announcement] Call For 3.3 Testers!

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Hear ye! Hear ye! This is a call for testers for the 3.3 release!!! > > What's Expected > --------------- > > You might be asking yourself, "Self, I would like to be an LLVM tester for > the 3.3 release, but I don't know what's involved in being one." Well, ask >

Not that I know of but it's definitely something we could use. The basic idea is to use the test-release.sh script that can be found in llvm source tree under utils/release. $ test-release.sh --help usage: test-release.sh -release X.Y -rc NUM [OPTIONS] -release X.Y The release number to test. -rc NUM The pre-release candidate number. -j NUM Number of compile jobs

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 01:12:57PM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote: > Hear ye! Hear ye! This is a call for testers for the 3.3 release!!! > Is there an official timeline yet for the 3.3 release? > What's Expected > --------------- > > You might be asking yourself, "Self, I would like to be an LLVM tester for the 3.3 release, but I don't know what's involved in

Happy April! [Contrary to the day, this is not an April Fool's joke. ;-)] It has been several months since the release of Clang 3.2. Now is the time to start thinking about the next release! The (very) tentative schedule is testing in May and a release in June. What This Means For You Now is the time to start thinking about which features you are currently working on and getting them

It is very exciting to see experimental Windows support listed for 3.3. Is there documentation somewhere that tracks what works and what doesn't in this configuration, particularly for C++?. Otherwise it is difficult for those not actively involved in developing Windows support to know what to expect when experimenting. Thanks, Andrew On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Bill Wendling

Happy First Day of Spring!! Now is the time to start thinking about the Clang/LLVM 3.1 release. Our testers are great people with the patience of Job, but we need more people testing LLVM on more platforms. If you are willing to be a tester for LLVM's 3.1 release, please email me and let me know. The 3.1 release doesn't have a schedule just yet, but testing will be throughout the month of

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Dmitry Mikushin <dmitry at kernelgen.org> wrote: > A tool of this kind here: https://github.com/apc-llc/nvcc-llvm-ir > > 2015-04-08 19:01 GMT+02:00 Ahmed ElTantawy <ahmede at ece.ubc.ca>: > >> Hi, >> >> I wanted to ask whether there is ongoing effort (or an already >> established tool) that enables to convert CUDA

Hi LLVM-ites! We are doing a quick test of 3.3rc3. Our testers did a quick turn around and created binaries which you can test. Please give them a go and let us know how they work for you. They are here: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.3/rc3 We don't have a lot of time remaining in the release cycle, so please do whatever you can to make sure they are solid. In particular, make sure that

On 03/04/2013 11:07, Renato Golin wrote: > On 1 April 2013 22:05, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com > <mailto:wendling at apple.com>> wrote: > > We would like to support ARM again. > > > Hi Bill, > > Glad you asked! ;) [...] > Sylvestre, > > If we do end up creating ARM binaries for the general public, your input > and expertise will

It's probably PR12517. Looking at the clang binary, it's got a /home/ dir in RPATH: $ objdump -p clang+llvm-3.3rc3-Ubuntu-12.04.2-x86_64/bin/clang | grep RPATH RPATH $ORIGIN/../lib:/home/aadgrand/tmp/LLVM-3.3rc3/rc3/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-3.3-rc3.obj/Release+Asserts/bin This will slow things down if the system tries to automount /home/aadgrand. Maybe we should merge r182559

On 1 Apr 2013, at 22:05, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > • MacOS X (x86) > • Linux (Ubuntu - x86) > • FreeBSD (x86) > • Windows (experimentally) > > We would like to support ARM again. Also, there has been significant improvements on other platforms. The only thing keeping us from releasing binaries for non-Intel platforms is a phalanx of testers for those

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:43 AM, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw > wrote: > > > If we do end up creating ARM binaries for the general public, your > input > > > and expertise will be greatly appreciated! ;) > > I will be happy to provide some Debian & Ubuntu ARM packages. I just > > need access to ARM server(s). > > I don't

On Jun 6, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > It's probably PR12517. > > Looking at the clang binary, it's got a /home/ dir in RPATH: > > $ objdump -p clang+llvm-3.3rc3-Ubuntu-12.04.2-x86_64/bin/clang | grep RPATH > RPATH >

Hi Bill, I was running some benchmarks and was surprised that the startup performance of your binaries is much worse than the stable binaries for 3.2 I've used: http://llvm.org/releases/3.2/clang+llvm-3.2-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-12.04.tar.gz vs http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.3/rc3/clang+llvm-3.3rc3-Ubuntu-12.04.2-x86_64.tar.gz On a simple hello.c file: /ssd/bench$ TIMEFORMAT="%E"

I'm not sure I follow. Will the final binaries have a bad RPATH or not? A 1sec startup pause on some (admittedly crazy) systems seems like a big deal to me. On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > On Jun 6, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > > > It's probably PR12517. > > > >

Hi all, It's the new year! So the question on everybody's mind is, of course, "Will there be another LLVM conference?". I'm sending this out to gauge interest levels. People seemed to like the conference last year, and I personally enjoyed meeting the LLVM community. If people are interested in having one this year, then we can start the process. So, what say ye? > -bw

> > If we do end up creating ARM binaries for the general public, your input > > and expertise will be greatly appreciated! ;) > I will be happy to provide some Debian & Ubuntu ARM packages. I just > need access to ARM server(s). I don't know if there is such server available. If so, I also would like give help. :) Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer

Hi Mehmet, Thanks for the info. I just contacted DSA (Debian System Admin, I guess), and he said we have to prepare information list on [1] and ask DD to approve it. Are you a DD, or Sylvestre is? Regards, chenwj [1] http://dsa.debian.org/doc/guest-account/ -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.) Tel:886-2-2788-3799

Dear List, Im new to R - making a transition from SAS. I have a space delimited file with the following structure. Each line in the datafile is identified by the first letter. A = Inventory (Inventory) X = Stratum (Stratum_no Total Ye=year established) P = Plot (Plot_no age slope= species) T = Tree (tree_no frequency) L = Leader (leader diameter height) F = Feature (start_height finish_height

ParaSail (http://parasail-lang.org) is a safe pervasively-parallel object-oriented programming language. Starting in June 2014 we began the construction of an LLVM-based backend for ParaSail. The existing ParaSail interpreter is broken into a front end that generates instructions for the "ParaSail Virtual Machine" (PSVM), and an interpreter for PSVM instructions. The LLVM-based