similar to: [LLVMdev] Phabricator unreachable

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Phabricator unreachable"

2013 Apr 28
0
[LLVMdev] Phabricator unreachable
Update for all: Sorry for the disruption, it couldn't have happened at a worse time. I've managed to figure out what happened and begin taking steps to correct things despite vacation, travel, and the up-coming conference. I'm hopeful that everything will be restored in the next day or two, and will remain permanently working from there onward. On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:37 PM,
2014 May 19
2
[LLVMdev] phabricator says "this commit is still importing"
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Alex Bradbury <asb at asbradbury.org> wrote: > On 12 May 2014 08:35, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> > wrote: > >> > >> It seems that we cannot execute svn commands against llvm-project any > >> more: > >> $ svn
2013 Jul 08
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator down
We should be back up - please let me know if anything doesn't work as expected... Cheers, /Manuel On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > Just as a tiny update, Manuel is actively working on it, but a small issue > has turned into a larger issue... stay tuned... > > > On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek
2014 Dec 11
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
Heya, I'll look into it first thing tomorrow - probably a problem with the encoding settings. On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 9:17:40 PM Robinson, Paul < Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote: > What I'm seeing is that Phabricator emails double-space *everything* > (not just the diffs). > > --paulr > > > > *From:* cfe-dev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu
2014 Dec 11
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 2:16:00 AM Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Jonathan Roelofs < >> jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: >> >>> I think the send-email part of phab has yet to come back up. >>>
2014 Dec 12
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
On Fri Dec 12 2014 at 12:55:01 PM İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > Can you point me at an example? I've spot checked stuff and cannot see > > anything out of the ordinary... > > This is only visible in GMail for me but looks like Phabricator is now >
2015 Jul 08
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
Ah, thanks, interesting - investigating On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:37 PM Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 8 July 2015 at 11:31, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > Those seem to be comments by the original author? Is this a problem? > > Not always, see http://reviews.llvm.org/D10676 or any other. > > I can only see the commenter
2014 May 12
2
[LLVMdev] phabricator says "this commit is still importing"
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > It seems that we cannot execute svn commands against llvm-project any more: > $ svn diff -r 208457:208458 'http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project' > svn: access to '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default' forbidden > > Tanja, any idea what changed? > (Tanya, sorry for messing up the name,
2013 Jul 11
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator down
Yep, sorry, we ran out of space on the instance's database volume. I'll update this once we're back up. On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Justin Holewinski < justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > Is Phabricator down again? I'm starting to see the following: > > [Rendering Exception] Multiple exceptions during processing and rendering. > -
2014 Dec 11
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com > wrote: > I think the send-email part of phab has yet to come back up. > Yes, restarting it would be very helpful. > > > Cheers, > > Jon > > > On 12/10/14 1:59 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote: > >> Phab is back up - it's still a little slow (the mysql database we use is
2015 Jul 02
3
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
This might be slightly off topic, but I'd really like a way to be able to run the buildbots off a Phabricator Diff before committing. On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > Unfortunately threading will be broken for changes currently under review > (new patches shouldn't have the problem). > I'm very sorry for this inconvenience
2013 Feb 24
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator homepage "UNRECOVERABLE FATAL ERROR"
Yes. I'm seeing the problem. The error text is: Cannot override final method LiskDAO::loadOneRelative() /srv/http/phabricator/src/applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepository.php:7 On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: >> >> When accessing
2014 Dec 10
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
Phab is back up - it's still a little slow (the mysql database we use is doing some cleanups). On Wed Dec 10 2014 at 5:07:07 PM suyog sarda <sardask01 at gmail.com> wrote: > And i was thinking something wrong with my proxy configuration :P > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > >> Heya, >> >> if you wonder
2014 Dec 11
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
Another php type problem; can you please try again. Thanks! On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 1:37:32 PM Bruno Cardoso Lopes < bruno.cardoso at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm facing the same problem. > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:16 AM, suyog sarda <sardask01 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am facing problem while submitting patch on phab. All things go smooth > - >
2015 Jul 09
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
I filed a ticket with sendgrid. Since we're paying them money nowadays, I hope they'll answer quickly On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:05 AM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > aaaaaand you're on the bounce list again. I'm going to delete you again, > but I'd be curious what the problem is... > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:50 PM Adam Nemet <anemet at
2012 Oct 18
3
[LLVMdev] Announcement: Phabricator for code reviews
Thanks, I've created https://secure.phabricator.com/T1930. Until that is resolved I'll create accounts for anybody who doesn't want to use OAuth - just shoot me a mail. Cheers, /Manuel On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > Manuel, > > On Oct 18, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > I
2014 Dec 11
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
Hi Manuel, Thanks for the help. Still persists for me too. Instead of waiting indefinitely, now I get this error: Unhandled Exception ("AphrontDeadlockQueryException") #1205: Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:26 AM, suyog sarda <sardask01 at gmail.com> wrote: > The problem still persist :( > > On 12/11/14, Manuel Klimek
2013 Jul 11
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator down
Is Phabricator down again? I'm starting to see the following: [Rendering Exception] Multiple exceptions during processing and rendering. - AphrontQueryConnectionException: Attempt to connect to phabricator at localhost failed with error #1040: Too many connections. - InvalidArgumentException: Argument 1 passed to AphrontView::setUser() must be an instance of PhabricatorUser, null
2015 Jul 02
5
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
Greetings llvm'ers, I'm working on an update to phabricator that brings our fork significantly closer to the upstream version, thus making maintenance much easier; this will allow us to upgrade more often. Upstream has fixed many issues and introduced new ways to customize the email flow, so a) while rolling out the new version I'll be fiddling with config settings; during that
2014 Dec 11
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
Hi, I am facing problem while submitting patch on phab. All things go smooth - create diff, create revision, specify title and comments. However, when I try to submit the diff by clicking "save" button, it takes a lot of time and eventually times out, failing to submit the patch. Any help on this? On Thursday, December 11, 2014, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: >