similar to: [LLVMdev] Questions about attaching DWARF source code debugging information to generated LLVM-IR.

One other thing that may or may not illuminate the situation. When I run under gdb (on OS X 10.8.3 this is an ancient version of gdb 6.3.5 - but it works with clang compiled C++ code) I get the following error when I try to list a line in dwarf1.lsp: Dwarf Error: Cannot handle DW_FORM_<unknown> in DWARF reader [in module /Users/meister/Development/cando/src/tests/core/dwarf1.bundle] (gdb)

Hmm, are you using a version of LLVM with asserts enabled (I.e. A debug build)? I cut-and-paste your IR into a text file and ran (a debug version of) llc on it, which caused the following assertion failure that seems related to some DWARF mishap: llc: ../lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp:1400: void llvm::DwarfDebug::beginFunction(const llvm::MachineFunction*): Assertion `TheCU &&

Hey folks, I'm wrestling with adding DWARF source code file/line information to my generated LLVM-IR from my Common Lisp compiler. I think I'm doing everything properly using the llvm::DIBuilder class - but when I load my Common Lisp application and load a compiled bundle into it I don't seem to be able to access the metadata properly. I can list source lines using "l -f

I switched my Common Lisp compiler to use MCJIT on the weekend and ran into a weird problem compiling one particular function. It crashes with an EXC_BAD_ACCESS error in MCJIT::finalizeObject when calling processFDE. The weird part is that the function does not appear to do anything special and I've whittled it down to the minimum size that still causes the crash. If I remove even one

I didn't make it clear that I load my Common Lisp application into "lldb" and then load a compiled bundle into my application using dlopen (I'm on OS X and I'm generating a kind of shared library called a "bundle"). Once everything is loaded, the functions from the bundle are accessible to my Common Lisp environment but I don't seem to be able to access the

Hi Christian, Thanks for sharing this. Yaron Keren has been investigating some problems in the EH frame registration code recently, and I think this may be related. It at least sounds similar to the type of variations in behavior based on code size that Yaron was seeing. -Andy -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of

Hi, I had similar problems with EH in ELF in RTDyldMemoryManager::registerEHFrames() calling __register_frame(). I'm not sure these problems are related to this problem since your crash happens in RuntimeDyldMachO::registerEHFrames() in its own processFDE (there are two functions named processFDE(), one in RuntimeDyldMachO.cpp and one in RTDyldMemoryManager.cpp) *before*

Correct or no I don't know, but this change will affect all x86-64 targets including Linux and Windows as getMaxStubSize() is called from the ELF linker as well as the Mach-O linker. 2013/10/15 Christian Schafmeister <chris.schaf at verizon.net> > > With the help of iain at codesourcery.com and andrew.kaylor at intel.com we > tracked the problem down to a bad relocation that

Yes, you are correct Yaron. Before we commit this we ought to put a check in to see what the target OS is. I just suggested the change below as a quick and easy way to verify that this was the cause of the problem. I'll clean it up. -Andy From: Yaron Keren [mailto:yaron.keren at gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 9:09 PM To: Christian Schafmeister; Kaylor, Andrew; iain at

If I spoke incorrectly about what systems this problem/change effects I apologize. I'll leave it to Andrew to determine that. Best, .Chris. "Kaylor, Andrew" <andrew.kaylor at intel.com> writes: > Yes, you are correct Yaron.  Before we commit this we ought to put a > check in to see what the target OS is.  I just suggested the change > below as a quick and easy way

Hello everyone, Is fully relocatable/position-independent JITted code on the horizon or currently possible with LLVM? I’ve written a Common Lisp compiler (currently called Clasp: https://github.com/drmeister/clasp) in C++ that uses LLVM as the backend and interoperates with C++. It uses copying garbage collection via the Memory Pool System (MPS) garbage collector by Ravenbrook. This garbage

Is it possible to inline functions compiled from C++ code into generated code that is fed, Module by Module, into the ORC JIT? I'd like to add a Module compiled from C++ code into the JIT and then as I add later modules, functions from the first module are inlined in the later ones. I already do this for file compilation/linking in my Common Lisp compiler “Clasp” (github.com/drmeister/clasp

With the help of iain at codesourcery.com and andrew.kaylor at intel.com we tracked the problem down to a bad relocation that was clobbering the first bytes of the eh_frame. I think this problem/solution may be OS X specific. On akaylor's suggestion I made the change below and my reproducable test case now compiles fine with MCJIT. As well, my Common Lisp code base now compiles using MCJIT

Hi, There may be two problems with __register_frame usage. However based on http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-April/061768.html I think the existing code is correct for OS-X but likely buggy for Linux and Windows systems. Your crash is on OS-X, right? Anyhow, the first problem is very easy to fix. On Linux and Windows (at least) __register_frame should be called once and not

Logan, How would I dump the object file generated by the JIT compiler pipeline? Could you point me to an example of how something like that is done? I’m used to working with the JIT machinery in memory but not writing object files out to disk. I’m have code to generate object files for AOT compilation - is it done the same way? Best, .Chris. On Apr 12, 2015, at 2:27 PM, Logan Chien

This is the only thing that I’ve found that works in terms of getting the exception to propagate out of the JITted function - change the “call” to an “invoke” and hook in the do-nothing landing-pad. https://gist.github.com/drmeister/7a35046f666826206973 Compare line 646 of the file above to the one that I just posted. > https://gist.github.com/drmeister/b97dec956c6ee9ffeb75 The first one

Logan, I need to make a correction of the post that preceded this one! I was wrong when I said this: > When I load the bitcode file for this module and then dump it just before it is JITted, the “uwtable” attribute has disappeared - is this prune-eh doing its work even though it’s not listed above in the list of function pass managers? The “uwtable” attribute does not disappear! I had

> On 2015-Jan-19, at 12:38, Frédéric Riss <friss at apple.com> wrote: > > >> On Jan 19, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Christian Schafmeister <chris.schaf at verizon.net> wrote: >> >> >> I forgot to mention this in my initial email. >> >> The build of LLVM that I was using was commit a0d5d7aed8e177cea381b3d054d80c212ece9f2c >> The date on the

I forgot to mention this in my initial email. The build of LLVM that I was using was commit a0d5d7aed8e177cea381b3d054d80c212ece9f2c The date on the commit is: Date: Fri Sep 26 12:34:06 2014 Also: Today I grabbed the ToT llvm/clang/clang-extra-tools and I’m working on getting my code to be compatible with it. I can switch back and forth between the current ToT llvm and the old one. Thanks,