similar to: [LLVMdev] Adding custom pragma's for generating particular LLVM IR

* Introduce new variants of the logging functions which include errno values (converted using strerror) in the messages passed to the application''s logging callback. * Use the new errno-including logging functions everywhere where appropriate. In general, xc_... functions return errno values or 0; xs_... functions return 0 or -1 (or some such) setting errno. * When

OK. That helps. It does flash a warning though [DEVICE-C++] nbody.kernel.cpp nbody.kernel.cpp:29:9: warning: '__constant__' macro redefined #define __constant__ __attribute__((address_space(2))) ^ /opt/cuda/include/host_defines.h:183:9: note: previous definition is here #define __constant__ \ ^ 1 warning generated. Another question is What about extern __shared__ ? I

Hi all, I'm looking into the performance difference of a benchmark compiled with NVCC vs NVPTX (coming from Julia, not CUDA C) and I'm seeing a significant difference due to PTX instruction ordering. The relevant source code consists of two nested loops that get fully unrolled, doing some basic arithmetic with values loaded from shared memory: > #define BLOCK_SIZE 16 > >

We already have a pass that vectorizes loads and stores in nvptx and amdgpu. Not at my laptop, I forget the exact filename, but it's called load-store vectorizer. I think the question is, why is LSV not vectorizing this code? I think the answer is, llvm can't tell that the loads are aligned. Ptxas can, but only because it's (apparently) doing vectorization *after* it reesolves the

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:29 AM, upit <uday_pitambare at yahoo.com> wrote: > OK. That helps. > It does flash a warning though > > [DEVICE-C++] nbody.kernel.cpp > nbody.kernel.cpp:29:9: warning: '__constant__' macro redefined > #define __constant__ __attribute__((address_space(2))) > ^ > /opt/cuda/include/host_defines.h:183:9: note: previous

The problem you are seeing is because clang is putting the global variables in address space 0, which in NVPTX means the generic address space. PTX does not allow this, so the back-end *should* be printing an error for you. Are you using trunk or 3.2? Generally, clang won't be compatible with the CUDA Toolkit headers. If you want to use the __constant__ modifier from CUDA in Clang, define

Please find the .ll attached below . Yes, I am using the cuda_runtime.h from the toolkit. nbody.kernel.ll <http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/file/n56048/nbody.kernel.ll> - Uday -- View this message in context: http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/UNREACHABLE-executed-error-while-trying-to-generate-PTX-tp56026p56048.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hello, I've made a backend for Tile64 processor as my master's thesis. Of course, there is a lot to do in order to harness all the power of the processor, but LLVM programs already can be compiled to tile assembly. If anyone interested in the backend, just let me know and I release the code on our project site. One way to improve my backend is to utilize its ILP capabilities, so I'd

Hi, We wrote an optimization that eliminates common sub-expressions in a group of similar GEPs for the NVPTX backend. It speeds up some of our benchmarks by up to 20%, which convinces us to try to upstream it. Here's a brief description of why we wrote this optimization, what we did, and how we did it. Loops in CUDA programs are often extensively unrolled by programmers and compilers,

Matthew Daley (13): libxl: fix unsigned less-than-0 comparison in e820_sanitize libxl: check for xc_domain_setmaxmem failure in libxl__build_pre libxl: correct file open success check in libxl__device_pci_reset libxl: don''t leak p in libxl__wait_for_backend libxl: remove unsigned less-than-0 comparison libxl: actually abort if initializing a ctx''s lock fails libxl:

Given a particular user or particular group, is there a rpm command that returns what package created that particular user or particular group? Analogous to `rpm -q --whatprovides /etc/security/limits.conf` returns the package "pam". Is there an rpm command that returns what package generated a particular user? Most of us already know that the httpd package is associated with the user

Guys, I have a pc (already joinned the samba domain 'DOMAIN') that I want to keep off other domain users but user DOMAIN\mark and DOMAIN\thomas whilst letting both of them to logon freely to other computers. I tried sambaUsersWorkstations but it only works with uid (Users not Computers) and it dictated which computer such a user may logon to. What I want is the opposite: which users may

On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 11:39:33 +0100 Zdravko Zdravkov via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi all. > > Our setup is samba+dlz AD DC. Since last week the DNS doesn't resolve > the delegated record for our storage *storage.domain.ltd* > (192.168.26.xx) when being queried from clients in 192.168.29.0 which > is our openvpn designated network. The OpenVPN is

On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 12:12:43 +0100 Zdravko Zdravkov <nirayah at gmail.com> wrote: > True that! Sorry > > smb.conf > > > > [global] > > netbios name = AD > > realm = XXXX.CO.UK > > server role = active directory domain controller > > server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, > >

Hi all. Our setup is samba+dlz AD DC. Since last week the DNS doesn't resolve the delegated record for our storage *storage.domain.ltd* (192.168.26.xx) when being queried from clients in 192.168.29.0 which is our openvpn designated network. The OpenVPN is configured to push the DNS of our network, and also successfully resolves other hosts in the 192.168.26.0 subnet. I have no memory of

Hi Rowland. Trying the suggested named.conf broke the local resolve of the storage as well (for clients in 192.168.26.0), so I reverted back to my old one since I have computers here using the storage at the moment. Would you have any other suggestions? On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 12:12:43 +0100 >

Hi Hal, Thanks for your comments! I'm inlining my responses below. Jingyue On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > Jingyue, > > I can't speak for the NVPTX backend, but I think this looks useful as an > (optional) target-independent pass. A few thoughts: > > - Running GVN tends to be pretty expensive; have you tried EarlyCSE

True that! Sorry smb.conf > [global] > netbios name = AD > realm = XXXX.CO.UK > server role = active directory domain controller > server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, > winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate > workgroup = XXXX > idmap config XXXX:unix_nss_info = yes >

I have a page that hides elements using CSS display: none. I don''t expect RSpec to test any changes made by Javascript; I just want to test how the page loads initially: what is visible and what is not. Can I test this in RSpec? Or do I need to use something like Selenium? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I want to get the list of sheets created as per month wise.i.e., i want a drop down menu if i select june i want the sheets created in the month of june. could any one please help me? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.