similar to: [LLVMdev] Memory dependence profiling in LLVM

Hi, On 04/19/2013 09:40 AM, Unnikrishnan C wrote: > access to memory locations. > > example > suppose we have > A[ind1[i]=expr; (s1) > and A1[i]=A[ind2[i]] (s2) > > to find what is the probability for RAW dependence from s1-->s2 and WAR > dependence from s2--->s1 and WAW dependence from s1-->s1 > There exists the

Hello, I want to run SPEC2000 benchmark in LLVM to check correctness of a llvm module which I wrote. How to run SPEC2000 benchmark in LLVM? Unnikrishnan C -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

----------------- Hello, I want to do a memory dependence profiling. Is there any freely available implementation of memory dependence profiling implementations in LLVM which I can modify for my own use? Unnikrishnan C -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

Hi Unnikrishnan C, On 18/01/13 09:09, unni_c at csa.iisc.ernet.in wrote: > Hello, > > I want to run SPEC2000 benchmark in LLVM to check correctness of a llvm > module which I wrote. How to run SPEC2000 benchmark in LLVM? > > Unnikrishnan C do you know how to run LLVM's nightly testsuite? It has support for SPEC. When you configure LLVM you need to use --with-externals to

Hello, I modified the PathProfiling.cpp and run opt -inesrt-path-profiling. it works correctly ,but after path-profile is complete in Verifier::visitTerminatorInst it prints "Terminator found in the middle of a basic block!" . error is I added two basic blocks after return basic block and return has br label %newprint when printed in pathprofile module but in

Sub:-code added by my path profiler module not executing with llvm-gcc -03 When compile with llvm-gcc -O3 the path profile result shows frequency count of zero for all paths ins some functions I have four functions insert,delete,print and main. It prints correct values for delete's and main's paths and zero values for print's and insert's paths. This problem occurs only with

I wanted to generate code for ia64 machine with instructions such as speculative load(ld.s) and checks(chk.s) using llvm .Does the LLVM currently uses these instructions when generating code for ia64?.If not how to generate code using these instructions? Unnikrishnan C -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

Hi, I am working on voice application. I want to identify RTP packets and set DSCP for those. Is there anyway to accomplish this task either using tc or iptables. Please help me.. Thank you -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

On 4/27/12 2:05 PM, shanmuk rao wrote: > Hi, > I am using Loop pass ( runOnLoop() function ) > In this function I want to access all the Loops in all the functions > in the current Module > > the LoopInfo Pass only gives the Loops in the function where the > current Loop resides :-( > > Is there any other Pass by which I can access the Loops in others > functions

Hi, I am using Loop pass ( runOnLoop() function ) In this function I want to access all the Loops in all the functions in the current Module the LoopInfo Pass only gives the Loops in the function where the current Loop resides :-( Is there any other Pass by which I can access the Loops in others functions as well ? ...... Regards, Shanmukha Rao -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

I am looking for the R install package. Any leads to sites from where I can download the same? Thanks Robert ===== Robert John Graduate Student Centre for Ecological Sciences Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 560 012 INDIA Phone : 91-80-3600985 91-80-3092506 Fax : 91-80-3601428 e-mail : robert at ces.iisc.ernet.in

Hi , I am facing a strange problem .I am unable to install CentOS 4.0 on my HP DL145 G2 Server .I am getting the following error RAMDISK: couldn't find valid RAM disk image starting at 0. Please append correct "root=" boot option VFS: cannot open root device "<NULL>" or unknown-block (3,3) Kernal panic - not syncing VFS unable to mount root fs however CentOS 3.5

Hi Could any one tell me about how to create our own class , where to put it and how to access that class in controller Thanks in advance Unnikrishnan -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email

Dear Dibyendu, Thanks for your response. :-) > If you are looking for only dependences which are inter-iteration (dependence distance != 0 ) you can do a post-pass on the ld/st addresses collected Yes, I am more interested in inter-iteration dependence. Could you provide more information or some links on post-pass approach? I have no idea on your method. :-) > eliminate such

Hi LLVM-ers, I try to develop my custom dynamic data dependence tool (focusing on nested loops), currently I can successfully get the trace including load/store address, loop information, etc. However, when I try to analyze dynamic data dependence based on the pairwise method described in [1], the load/store for iteration variables may interfere my analysis (I only care about the load/store for

Dear Dibyendu and Mobi, Thanks for your help! :-) I finally figure it out. The solution is really simple. I just need to generate a new bitcode file with the following command: ----- opt -mem2reg -indvars test1.bc -o test2.bc ----- Then the load/store for induction variables will be removed and replaced by PHI instructions and all remaining load/store instructions are those I am interested in. I

Ram, I sent https://review.gluster.org/17765 to fix the possibility in bulk removexattr. But I am not sure if this is indeed the reason for this issue. On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Ankireddypalle Reddy <areddy at commvault.com> wrote: > Thanks for the swift turn around. Will try this out and let you know. > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > Ram > > *From:*

Hi mobi, Sorry, I am new to clang AST and can not get the point you mentioned. :-( What I try to do is develop a tool that can analyze data dependence at runtime. Therefore, I need to analyze trace containing memory accessing information (eg. arrays within loops). To do that, I first instrument a recording function to get addresses of load/store instructions. However, there are

Hi, I am Adil Arun Dangui, a 3rd year B.Tech student at IIT Hyderabad with a CGPA of 9.17. I am interested in Compilers, Compiler Optimizations and excited about LLVM and Polly. I have some familiarity of LLVM structure as we studied it in the Compiler Engineering course at IITH. Here

Thanks for the swift turn around. Will try this out and let you know. Thanks and Regards, Ram From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:31 AM To: Sanoj Unnikrishnan Cc: Ankireddypalle Reddy; Gluster Devel (gluster-devel at gluster.org); gluster-users at gluster.org Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] gfid and volume-id extended attributes lost Ram,