similar to: [LLVMdev] Concurrent library

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Concurrent library"

2013 Mar 27
0
[LLVMdev] Concurrent library
Have you looked at Thread Sanitizer < http://clang.llvm.org/docs/ThreadSanitizer.html>? -- Sean Silva -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130327/332bffbb/attachment.html>
2011 Jun 16
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker
On Jun 16, 2011, at 1:27 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > Hello again, > > The tool we announced 1.5 months ago has matured quite a bit. > In addition to heap out-of-bound and use-after-free bugs it also finds stack overruns/underruns. > AddressSanitizer is being actively used by the Chromium developers and already found over 20 bugs:
2011 Jun 16
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 16, 2011, at 1:27 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > > Hello again, > > The tool we announced 1.5 months ago has matured quite a bit. > In addition to heap out-of-bound and use-after-free bugs it also finds > stack overruns/underruns. > AddressSanitizer is being actively used by
2011 Jun 16
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker
Hello again, The tool we announced 1.5 months ago has matured quite a bit. In addition to heap out-of-bound and use-after-free bugs it also finds stack overruns/underruns. AddressSanitizer is being actively used by the Chromium developers and already found over 20 bugs: http://blog.chromium.org/2011/06/testing-chromium-addresssanitizer-fast.html Question to the LLVM developers: would you
2013 Jun 13
0
[LLVMdev] DataFlowSanitizer design discussion
Could you maybe give some example use cases? Also, "sanitizer" may not be the best name for this, since it doesn't really sanitize anything. -- Sean Silva -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130613/89f3df75/attachment.html>
2012 Dec 04
5
[LLVMdev] LLVM documentation work help
Sean, I can create html, pdf and epub, then put them on <https://github.com/Jonathan2251/lbd/tree/gh-pages>. The uvbook example as below can click the pdf link and pop up a download window while I cannot. The uvbook link is put on http://username.github.com/... while the "make gh-pages" put them on https://github.com/username/...  How can I have the download link like uvbook
2012 Sep 21
2
[LLVMdev] yaml2obj.rst where to link? (Sphinx warns)
Also, why does it say yaml2py?: yaml2obj takes a YAML description of an object file and converts it to a binary file. $ yaml2py input-file .. program:: yaml2py --Sean Silva On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: >> Sphinx warns that yaml2obj
2012 Dec 03
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM documentation work help
Sean, The `.. code-block:: bash` is work. Thank your information. Currently, I can put reStructuredText files on github. But, your example uvbook seems put the html and pdf on different github directory. Do you put html and pdf on github with version control? Jonathan On 2012/12/3, at 上午7:43, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > It looks like things are going well. > >
2012 Dec 03
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM documentation work help
Let me explain how uvbook does it. They use a feature of github called "github pages", which provides small static website hosting. The way that github pages works is that you make a git branch `gh-pages` which contains the generated HTML. They explain it better here <https://help.github.com/articles/creating-project-pages-manually>. You can see how uvbook does it by looking at
2012 Dec 06
2
[LLVMdev] Converting documentation to rst
FYI I am bout to convert LangRef. it should be done by the end of today. Please keep me up to date with any work you do on the other documents. -- Sean Silva On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > Thanks for doing this. > > I was planning on finishing these by this weekend. If you are planning > on taking significantly longer than that I
2012 Dec 04
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM documentation work help
You may need a ".nojekyll" file. uvbook has one < https://github.com/nikhilm/uvbook/blob/gh-pages/.nojekyll>. Also see < https://help.github.com/articles/files-that-start-with-an-underscore-are-missing >. Let me know if that doesn't work. -- Sean Silva On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:15 PM, gamma_chen <gamma_chen at yahoo.com.tw> wrote: > Sean, > > I can
2013 Jun 18
3
[LLVMdev] Building a stable bitcode format for PNaCl - based on LLVM IR
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > Instead of a blacklist, why not a whitelist? Given the size of LangRef, > you're bound to leave something out of your blacklist that needs to be > there (also, future additions to LLVM IR will need to be added to the > blacklist; are you sure you can catch *all* of them?). A whitelist seems >
2012 Jun 14
2
[LLVMdev] Default to "reply all" for mailing list messages?
The irony of this reply is killing me :) On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > You're not alone :) Don't let it bug you. > > I finally decided to install a GMail extension that enables reply-all for > all messages, because I kept forgetting. Perhaps you can find such an > extension or simply enable reply-all by default?
2012 Nov 14
0
[LLVMdev] Kill TestSuiteMakefileGuide.html?
Unfortunately, LNT still uses the Makefiles underneath, and the Makefiles support a few users who use the more advanced hackery they support. We should keep it for the time being. - Daniel On Nov 14, 2012, at 13:30, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > The top of the file says that it is deprecated in favor of LNT. Is > this document still needed? It makes mention of
2012 Dec 04
3
[LLVMdev] Minimum Python Version
So, I just tried, and basically it's difficult to make progress due to the print statements (since they induce an immediate syntax error). Since 2.4 doesn't support `from __future__ import print_function`, the only alternative I guess is shimming in a print function. This is a maintenance effort that I don't want to do right now (and, TBQH, I feel that the proper maintainer should be
2013 Jan 01
2
[LLVMdev] Git-Svn commit?
On 1 January 2013 02:03, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > I'm not sure if this was clear from my description, but it will still > commit each commit in `origin/master..HEAD` individually. Not explicitly, but I assumed so. Good thing git has a powerful squash/merge/reword interface. This is probably another topic that it's worth mention in the docs explicitly. --
2012 Nov 14
4
[LLVMdev] Kill TestSuiteMakefileGuide.html?
Sorry for the bother Jim, but I'm calling on you again for guidance about llvm-gcc mentions. What should be done about the mention of llvm-gcc on <http://llvm.org/docs/TestSuiteMakefileGuide.html>? Can we just roughly s/llvm-gcc/clang/ ? Daniel, feel free to provide guidance as well. -- Sean Silva On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel.dunbar at gmail.com> wrote:
2013 Feb 12
2
[LLVMdev] Using the New Attributes Classes
Hi Sean, I think it can go in as it is. It's a good start. Thanks, Joe! -bw On Feb 9, 2013, at 9:46 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > This looks like a good starting point. I would prefer to call it HowToUseAttributes.rst though (it is essentially a HowTo). > > Bill, is it ok to commit this, or would you like cook up something different to go into the docs?
2013 Jun 18
0
[LLVMdev] Building a stable bitcode format for PNaCl - based on LLVM IR
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > >> Instead of a blacklist, why not a whitelist? Given the size of LangRef, >> you're bound to leave something out of your blacklist that needs to be >> there (also, future additions to
2012 Jun 14
1
[LLVMdev] Default to "reply all" for mailing list messages?
btw, the "default reply-to-all" extension for gmail works great! On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hehe, I intentionally left out the group because I just wanted to cheer > you up and let you know that there's more than one "retard" on the list. > > > 2012/6/14 Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> >