similar to: [LLVMdev] MnemonicAliases and side-effects

Short answer: No, that's not how assembly aliases work. A MnemonicAlias is entirely a construct of the assembly parser. By the time anything that matches via the alias gets to parts of the toolchain that know anything about uses and defs, it's as-if there only ever were one instruction definition at all. -Jim On Mar 25, 2013, at 10:08 AM, Muhammad Tauqir Ahmad <muhammad.t.ahmad at

I am new to the LLVM backends, I am wondering how instruction selection is done in LLVM backends, I looked at the .td files in Target/X86, they all seem to be small and do not deal with common X86 instructions, i.e. mov, push, pop, etc. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

respectd sir,  i am working on regional frequency analysis of flood flow data and want to use packages lmomRFA, lmom, imomco,etc andby using these i want to find RMSE , errorbounds and absolute biase but could not make it clear to use, please help regards atta muhammad asif assistant professor atta_ycc@yahoo.com [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Here is what I am trying to do but don't know if it is possible or how to do. Scenario: A pxelinux.cfg boot menu item to load a pristine image. This would execute a script on the linux server providing the pxe boot service to copy / rsync a pristine image and boot from that image. Or at least just do the copy on the server side. Context: I am setting up a drbl (diskless remote boot linux)

On Oct 5, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: > I've been working on adding support for the PPC 440/450 "embedded" cores > to the PowerPC backend. These are used on IBM's Blue Gene L and P > supercomputers, but are also used in other environments (like on the > Xilinx Virtex-5). Here is my first patch. I'm new to LLVM, and so I > apologize if this is the wrong

So IMO, if we modify the VF calculation for targets/subtargets using TTI where higher VF is supported The vectorizer’s scope will become wider. Did/do you foresee any issue with this? Thanks, Shahid From: Nadav Rotem [mailto:nrotem at apple.com] Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 2:47 AM To: Shahid, Asghar-ahmad Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Vectorization factor limitation in

Hi All, I am migrating a build system of an existing project from 'Object files' based executable generation to 'LLVM Bitcode' files based exe generation and applying OPT pass to LLVM Bitcode. I found out the following 4 step procedure. Please let me know if this is the right procedure or is there any other easy way of doing it. I need to modify 'Makefile' accordingly. I

Dear All I want to generate multivariate normal data in R for a given covariance matrix, i.e. my generated data must have the given covariance matrix. I know the rmvnorm command is to be used but may be I am failing to properly assign the covariance matrix. Any help will be greatly appreciated thanks. M. R. Ahmad

I've been working on adding support for the PPC 440/450 "embedded" cores to the PowerPC backend. These are used on IBM's Blue Gene L and P supercomputers, but are also used in other environments (like on the Xilinx Virtex-5). Here is my first patch. I'm new to LLVM, and so I apologize if this is the wrong way to do this [the online docs seem to imply that a patch should be

Hi all, I am using the zoo package to plot time series. I have a problem with formatting the axes. my zoo object (z) looks like the following. c1 1992-01-10 21 1992-01-17 34 1992-01-24 33 1992-01-31 41 1992-02-07 39 1992-02-14 38 1992-02-21 37 1992-02-28 28 1992-03-06 33 1992-03-13 40

Hi Shahid, Thank you so much for your response. You suggested approach is what I am right now using. However, it seems that the overhead is a little bit high because we are introducing two more instructions. I was wondering if there was a cheaper way to do it. Best, Zhi On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Shahid, Asghar-ahmad < Asghar-ahmad.Shahid at amd.com> wrote: > Hi Zhi, > >

Hi Asghar-Ahmed, I saw your last ping - sorry, I'm away on vacation and back on Wednesday. Generally, I'm not sure that having both absd/hadd and sad are compatible with the discussions going on in other threads, for example my thread about min and max. Given that those two intrinsics are fairly trivial to match , I don't see the need to have two different canonical forms. James On

Hi Tim, Thanks for the nice answer. The code that you mentioned, seems to generate the IR. You mean I should reuse the code to extract and output the register names in a file. Next, I should postprocess the file in my own pass? Regards. On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 at 13:09, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ahmad, > > On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 at 13:39, Ahmad Nouralizadeh

Hi, I would like to ask if LLVM provides a utility function like 'isMallocCall' to check if the 'call' instruction is calling some 'foo' user defined function? If there is no such utility function then I am thinking to do this in the following way: bool testFoo(CallInst *CI) { Function *Callee = CI->getCalledFunction(); if (Callee->getName() == "foo")

LLVM is built in Release mode. The version is 6.0.0. I think that a similar code worked on verison 3.9.0. It is probably a null pointer dereference occurring in eraseFromParent(). I checked and reconfirmed that the instruction had no uses. Perhaps I should rebuild LLVM. Thanks. On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 9:03 PM, mayuyu.io <admin at mayuyu.io> wrote: > Hmmmm that’s strange. Do you get an

Hello R-users, I would like to know how to find the standard deviation for each element in a set of matrices. Given the following files, File1 File2 File3 1 1 1 4 4 4 7 7 7 2 2 2 5 5 5 8 8 8 3 3 3 6 6 6 9 9 9 I want to calculate the standard deviation for every cell in the file (I'm using gridded data). The desired output is Output 3 3 3 3 3

Hi Team, I am migrating one of the Pass that was written for llvm2.2 or older to llvm3.1. The code snippet looks like the following: Constant *func; void add( Module *M) { func = M->getOrInsertFunction("func", Type::getVoidTy(M->getContext()), NULL); } virtual bool runOnModule(Module &M) { add (&M); for(Module::iterator F = M.begin(), E = M.end(); F !=

hi any one tell me how to make a dialplan my extensions.conf exten => _40XXXXXXXXXXXX,1,Dial(OH323/${EXTEN}) i want to dial to 40XXXXXXXXXXXX number. XXXXXXXXXXXX could be any number like 923335224005 or 92512213248 at the moment when i am trying to dial 40923335224005 asterisk is dialing Executing Dial("OH323/R11429", "OH323/40923335224005") but i want him to dial

Dear R community I have stored the results of arrays in a list consist of J-components (say 200 components). Each component containing same no of columns but may be different no of rows. e.g [[1]] [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [1,] 4 0 0 0 0 [2,] 4 3 4 0 0 [3,] 4 3 4 0 0 [4,] 4 3 0 0 0 [[2]] [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5]

Hi Nadav/Devs I am exploring Loop Vectorizer to vectorize i8 scalar operations into 8xi8 vector operation. I was expecting the Loop Vectorizer to analyze the profitability for vectorization factor(VF) of 8, However it is not doing so due to the widest type calculation done for the blocks inside the loop. May be I am missing something, however, I am curious to know why Loop Vectorizer limits the