similar to: [LLVMdev] Are you interested in writing a LLVM blog post?

Hi everybody, I do write some Clang/LLVM related articles on my blog[1][2], and I will be happy to write for LLVM’s blog. However, I can’t omit bike-shedding :) Forgive me my directness, but current blog doesn’t look like something close to 2016. The blog already has lots of great articles. But it’s so hard to grasp valuable information when you have to read non-highlighted C++ code. I think I

Hello! I am looking for a handful of people to help write blog posts for the LLVM blog (blog.llvm.org <http://blog.llvm.org/>) or to help recruit volunteers to write blog posts. The LLVM Project blog is a great place to share details about recent changes to LLVM, Clang, and related sub-projects. It also is a great place to highlight users of LLVM. You can write about your work or the work

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 17 May 2016 at 22:41, Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> If you are interested in volunteering for this position OR if you are >> interested in writing a blog post, please send me an email. > > Why don't we communicate the releases,

> On May 18, 2016, at 12:59 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > On 18 May 2016, at 07:45, Alex Denisov via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi everybody, >> >> I do write some Clang/LLVM related articles on my blog[1][2], and I will be happy to write for LLVM’s blog. >> >> However, I can’t

On 18 May 2016, at 07:45, Alex Denisov via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I do write some Clang/LLVM related articles on my blog[1][2], and I will be happy to write for LLVM’s blog. > > However, I can’t omit bike-shedding :) > > Forgive me my directness, but current blog doesn’t look like something close to 2016. > > The

The LLVM Foundation is pleased to announce its new Board of Directors: Chandler Carruth Hal Finkel Arnaud de Grandmaison David Kipping Anton Korobeynikov Tanya Lattner Chris Lattner John Regehr Three new members and five continuing members were elected to the eight person board. The new board consists of individuals from corporations and from the academic and scientific communities. They also

I can do it! -Raphael On Oct 16, 2017 12:48 PM, "Tanya Lattner via llvm-devmeeting" < llvm-devmeeting at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Can anyone help with this session? > > *Session 10 (2:10-3:40PM, General Session)* > Adding Index‐While‐Building and Refactoring to Clang > Advancing Clangd: Bringing persisted indexing to Clang tooling > > Thanks, > Tanya >

Has there been much thought of attempting to automate this process? I could imagine a fairly standard script that scrubbed a history for interesting tidbits. Of course a standard methodology for labeling types of commits would help this in the future. A very simple script could at least do unique word counts and throw out words that match a dictionary (like parts of speech, contributer names,

On Oct 27, 2011, at 5:37 PM, Michael Price wrote: > Has there been much thought of attempting to automate this process? I could imagine a fairly standard script that scrubbed a history for interesting tidbits. Of course a standard methodology for labeling types of commits would help this in the future. > > A very simple script could at least do unique word counts and throw out words

I'm still in need for moderators for the following sessions: > Moderator #3 (11:15-12:45, Regency 1) > Verified LLVM: Formalizing the semantics of the LLVM Intermediate Representation for Verified Program Transformations- Santosh Nagarakatte, University of Pennsylvania/Rutgers University > Integrated Security, using LLVM for Dynamic and Static Security Tasks- Jared Carlson,

> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:52:50 -0700 > From: Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> > Subject: [LLVMdev] Release Notes: Volunteers needed > We need some volunteers to help with the 3.0 release notes. Traditionally, Chris has been the one to go > through all the commits (6 months worth!) and come up with a concrete list of things that have changed in 3.0. > Ideally,

On Oct 13, 2011, at 10:33 AM, Raja Venkateswaran wrote: > I think we need a group of maintainers rather than a single maintainer given the spectrum of ARM targets/ISAs/platforms required to support and the amount of people/system resources required. I & my team plan to actively participate in the bug-fixing process during the release cycle. If we can divide the bugs among the maintainers

We are in desperate need of volunteers to moderate the sessions during the LLVM Developers Meeting. If you are attending and can act as moderator for a group of talks, please let us know. We need 5 more volunteers to moderate the following sessions. Please note your first choice session to moderate and your second choice: Session #1 (11:05-12:35): Integrating LLVM into FreeBSD: Brooks Davis –

All, We need volunteers for the Hacker’s Lab at the upcoming 2017 LLVM Developers’ Meeting! The Hacker’s Lab is for small groups to form to discuss topics or work on problems. Please let me know ASAP if you will able to volunteer so I can add your topic to the online listing and make appropriate signs. The Hackers Lab is split into 1.5 hour sessions. During each session, the Hackers Lab will

> 1. I'm still looking for volunteers to test MacOS X and Solaris. If you'd > like to volunteer, please email the list to let us know. I'll do minimal testing on Sparc. I'm not going to look into any regressions though since no one has been really watching Sparc since I graduated and I am sure there are regressions. > 2. If you maintain a platform other than those

Hello LLVM Developers! Last year, the LLVM Foundation sponsored a booth at the Grace Hopper Conference. I had 2 amazing volunteers from the community, David Blaikie and Anna Zaks, help me spread the word about LLVM, compilers, and open source. It was a great experience and we are hoping to repeat this at the upcoming 2018 Grace Hopper conference in Houston, TX on September 26-28. I’m looking

Ok, I have good news! Thanks for the help! On Jun 2, 2008, at 11:11 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > Many of you are probably wondering about the status of the 2.3 > release. Unfortunately, this release has been very difficult and > the list of regressions very high. The list has finally dwindled > down to the following regressions: > > Linux/x86: >

On Oct 7, 2011, at 1:29 AM, John Wiegley wrote: >>>>>> Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> writes: > >> If we had a larger set of volunteers that could help qualify releases AND >> buildbots to continuously test the new release criteria, then we are willing >> to expand this criteria. We haven't had a lot of volunteers step up in this >> area

On 11/2/05, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > > 1. I'm still looking for volunteers to test MacOS X and Solaris. If you'd > > like to volunteer, please email the list to let us know. > I can try to test on MacOS X. -bw

> On Jun 22, 2017, at 12:00 PM, Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote: > > On 06/21/2017 03:22 PM, Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: >> LLVMers, >> >> >> >> TheLLVM.org <http://LLVM.org>server which hosts SVN, GIT mirror, documentation, and the mainLLVM.org <http://LLVM.org>website is moving to a new server on June 24th. As a