similar to: [LLVMdev] How to use dropAllReferences in dropAllReferences

Hi all, I have the file which is assemble, I want to convert it to IR. Are there some tools to do this in LLVM? Thanks, Yao -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130503/d7fd4741/attachment.html>

Hi,guys: I am interested to use the IR information to modify the AST of the source code But I am not sure whether the LLVM support or not. Thanks, yao -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150327/e56f19a4/attachment.html>

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith < dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > > > On 2015 Jan 14, at 07:58, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> > wrote: > > > >> > >> On 2015 Jan 13, at 23:59, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015

Yes, it is a pass. Here is a very general overview of the file structure as far as the AA is concerned. LLVM is not my strong-suit, I do hardware simulators, not compilers. using namespace llvm; char RelRecovery::ID = 0; static RegisterPass<RelRecovery> X("relRecovery", "Reliability transformation for lightweight recovery"); void

Thank you very much for your reply. I think I found the key to the problem. But, I'd like you to confirm whether this is the issue. My gluster version is 3.8.9, And I found there is a bug in it, and fixed in 3.8.11: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431592 A large amount of memory allocated for agf_common_mt_strdup. Everythig else seem to be all right. My cluster:

On 8 November 2017 at 17:16, Yao Guotao <yaoguo_tao at 163.com> wrote: > Hi all, > I'm glad to add glusterfs community. > > I have a glusterfs cluster: > Nodes: 4 > System: Centos7.1 > Glusterfs: 3.8.9 > Each Node: > CPU: 48 core > Mem: 128GB > Disk: 1*4T > > There is one Distributed Replicated volume. There are ~160 k8s pods as > clients

Hi, all: I want to build the 32bit version of llvm in the ubuntu 64bit, need I add some parameter? Thanks yao -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130427/cff0539d/attachment.html>

Griffin Wright wrote: > > Hello all, > > I really, really, really need your help. This is my third email now, > please don't ignore me! I understand this must be a trivial thing, but > I've ground to a halt, and REALLY need some guidance. Please see below for > the context of my problem. I'm not trying to be a waste of time, but I'm > desperate here.

Hi, all: I wanted to use a FunctionPass (e.g. *MemoryDependenceAnalysis*) in a ModulePass, and then I used the method "getAnalysis<* MemoryDependenceAnalysis*>(llvm::Function *)" described at http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html#ModulePass to get the FunctionPass. But , it still crashed when I invoked this pass in tool 'opt'. However, if I change my pass to

Hi, I am trying to prune some uninteresting llvm ir branches, corresponding to the *if-else* condition in the source code. And here is the procedures: 1. Get the BasicBlock containing the BranchInst which has 2 successors(in order to keep consistent with the source code I am using the llvm ir without any optimizations, so SelectInst/SwitchInst/PHINode is absent), one of which should be

Dear UseRs: Recently, I have read an article regarding the association between age and lymph node metastases. http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/27/18/2931.long In statistical analysis, the authors stated "Because a nonlinear relationship between age and lymph node involvement was expected based on existing literature, lymph node involvement was also regressed on age using nonparametric

Hi, Devang. Thank you for your reply. But in my case, my ModulePass requires another FunctionPass (e.g. MemoryDependenceAnalysis) rather than the opposite direction. Is it also limited? - gauss Devang Patel-2 wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:35 AM, gauss<gausszhch at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, all: >> >> I wanted to use a FunctionPass (e.g.

Hi Duncan, I came across something like the following recently which I guess might be related to your recent work. Any ideas? $ clang++-tot -cc1 crash_on_invalid.cpp -g -emit-obj -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions crash_on_invalid.cpp:13:1: error: C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations x; ^ 1 error generated. *** Error in `clang++-tot': corrupted double-linked list: 0x000000000754f340

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:35 AM, gauss<gausszhch at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, all: > > I wanted to use a FunctionPass (e.g. MemoryDependenceAnalysis) in a > ModulePass, and then I used the method > "getAnalysis<MemoryDependenceAnalysis>(llvm::Function *)"  described at > http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html#ModulePass to get the > FunctionPass. But ,

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Jimborean Alexandra <xinfinity_a at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I try to write a FunctionPass that, among other tasks, has to clone some > loops from the current function. > How can I obtain the LPPassManager in order to use the CloneLoop function. > In a LoopPass this is a parameter for the runOnLoop, but how can I obtain it > in a

Hi Experts, I remember we had this discussion before, but could find it. Can I run a command to generate a "Compiled catalog" for a specific node (on the master node)? And apply this on the client node? What are the limitations for doing this? Basically we have special handling for the webserver/CA part of puppet. Thank you very much! -Yushu

Hi, I try to write a FunctionPass that, among other tasks, has to clone some loops from the current function. How can I obtain the LPPassManager in order to use the CloneLoop function. In a LoopPass this is a parameter for the runOnLoop, but how can I obtain it in a FunctionPass? I tried simply by creating a new instance : ValueMap<const Value *, Value* > VMap;

Dear All I have a lot of files in a directory as follows: "02-03.txt" "03-04.txt" "04-05.txt" "05-06.txt" "06-07.txt" "07-08.txt" "08-09.txt" "09-10.txt" "G0.txt" "G1.txt" "raw_ped.txt" .......................... I want to read them into different objects according

Hello all, I really, really, really need your help. This is my third email now, please don't ignore me! I understand this must be a trivial thing, but I've ground to a halt, and REALLY need some guidance. Please see below for the context of my problem. I'm not trying to be a waste of time, but I'm desperate here. I have a getAnalysisUsage method which does the following

Thanks for your help. Is there possible I can get the realily case value form the MI? For the case in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34902. as follows. ############################# * GCC v7.1 generated assembly ############################# ** Options: -Os -marm -march=armv7-a foo: @ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0 @ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0 sub