similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm cannot iterate a [3 x i8]

Dear all, I wrote the following batch script on a iMac, and ran it on a linux mosix cluster. tu <- read.table("cage.mm5.tags.rna_lib.CAA-CAJ.tu-reshape.table") tu_reshaped <- t(reshape(tu[1:50,], direction="wide", timevar="tu", idvar=c("rna","lib"))) write.table(tu_reshaped, "cage.mm5.tags.rna_lib.CAA-CAJ.tu-reshaped.table")

Hello, I am having a some problems getting SSHD to run on the Ipv6 interface. Interface/Ipv6 Address: ipv6.open-systems.org [kevin at satan kevin/xp-0.0.15] 536 $ping6 ipv6.open-systems.org PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 3ffe:1200:3028:ff01::cab --> 3ffe:1200:3028:ff01::caa 16 bytes from 3ffe:1200:3028:ff01::caa, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=73.96 ms sshd_config: ListenAddress

Hello everyone ! I followed http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4976298/modern-equivalent-of-llvm-annotationmanagerin order to get annotations from my target bytecode. All the examples that I give in the following is related to the code from that link. I have `__attribute__((annotate("DS"))) int f=0;` into the target C++ program and the related IR code: @.str = private unnamed_addr

Hi Nick, I have committed 0001 as r203788. I'm working on fixes for 0002 - 0014. > After reading through this patch series, I feel like I'm missing > something important. Where's the sort function? It looks like we're > still comparing all functions to all other functions. When you insert functions into std::set or its analogs it does all the job for you. Since

PowerDNS supports CAA records beginning with version 4.0, but the pdns package in EPEL for most recent centos versions is stuck at around version 3.4 (3.4.11 is what I have). Do I have no other choice but to manually compile and maintain my own pdns installation? I prefer to avoid this but I need up-to-date features. Perhaps there is a PowerDNS specific work-around? Maybe the EPEL

Hi Jan, > I've been looking into how to make llvm bitcode files smaller. There is one > simple change that appears to shrink linked bitcode files by about 15%. See > this spreadsheet for some rough data: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjRrJHQc4_bddEtJdjdIek5fMDdIdFFIZldZXzdWa0E the improvement is wonderful! ... > In any case, the patch is attached if

Hi Nick, Thanks, that seemed to work. Nick Lewycky wrote: > > ivtm wrote: >> I am processing the LLVM instructions and right now I am at the 'call' >> instruction. >> For now I just want to print the argument type. >> >> For example in the following: >> >> %0 = tail call i32 (...)* @__FFF (i32 8) nounwind; <i32> [#uses=1]

ivtm wrote: > I am processing the LLVM instructions and right now I am at the 'call' > instruction. > For now I just want to print the argument type. > > For example in the following: > > %0 = tail call i32 (...)* @__FFF (i32 8) nounwind; <i32> [#uses=1] > > I need to get access to 'i32' and '8' separately. > > I do: > >

I am processing the LLVM instructions and right now I am at the 'call' instruction. For now I just want to print the argument type. For example in the following: %0 = tail call i32 (...)* @__FFF (i32 8) nounwind; <i32> [#uses=1] I need to get access to 'i32' and '8' separately. I do: CallInst *CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(I); Value *v = CI->getOperand(1)

Another question, I need to get the "%0" below in the: %0 = tail call i32 (...)* @__FFF (i32 8) nounwind; <i32> [#uses=1] that is, the return register. I am wondering in general, where should I look in the llvm codebase for parsing instructions ? I am looking at existing passes and also the header files like Function.h, etc to see what methods they have, but it takes a while

Hi, Nick, thanks for the reply. I still have a problem: I only need to "clone" an Instruction, changing its type. That is, I would like to keep all characteristics of the old Instruction and create a new one only with a different type. I am trying create a new Instruction thus: %3 = add nsw i32 %1, %2 ; <i16> [#uses=2] //Old Instruction Value* Op0 = I->getOperand(0); Value*

Dear Sirs/Madam, I am a beginner to R, and I am currently working on a data matrix which looks like this: > head(oligo) ko:K00001 ko:K00003 ko:K00005 ko:K00008 ko:K00009 ko:K00010 ko:K00012 AAA 370 631 365 67 164 455 491 KAA 603 1208 170 157 68

On 11 June 2017 at 23:03, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > Try value->dump() assuming you're using a debug build. > > The information displayed is non-uniform. There are two different cases based on my sample program: (1) dump() shows the Type and *some* value which I don't understand what it is (2) dump() shows the instruction that

On 11 June 2017 at 23:06, Jeremy Lakeman <Jeremy.Lakeman at gmail.com> wrote: > http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#the-isa-cast-and-dyn-cast- > templates > I understand isa and dyn-cast let you test the type of an object at run-time by leveraging LLVM's custom implementation of RTTI. However, it doesn't make much sense to test out for all possible sub-classes to

As a concrete question, I understand 'Value' class is the parent of many concrete sub-classes. Let's say I retrieve a Value* value = store_inst->getValueOperand(). Unless I know what the sub-type is, how can I further use this object? I tried something like this: ================================================= Value* value = store_inst->getValueOperand()

On 01/24/2011 04:41 AM, Douglas do Couto Teixeira wrote: > Hi, > > Nick, thanks for the reply. > I still have a problem: I only need to "clone" an Instruction, changing > its type. That is, I would like to keep all characteristics of the old > Instruction and create a new one only with a different type. Sure, but what about its operands? An "add" instruction

The SCEV framework sorts operands of commutative SCEVs by their getSCEVType() value, and then does an ad-hoc sort to group repeated operands, but it does not do a full sort. In some test cases I'm looking at right now, this causes it to miss opportunities to reuse SCEV objects, as in cases like this: ( %i + %r54 + %r59) ( %r54 + %r59 + %i) As a result, passes like LoopStrengthReduce

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > On 01/24/2011 04:41 AM, Douglas do Couto Teixeira wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Nick, thanks for the reply. >> I still have a problem: I only need to "clone" an Instruction, changing >> its type. That is, I would like to keep all characteristics of the old >> Instruction

Launcher <st.liucheng at gmail.com> writes: > I am able to access the source operands of an instruction using either > getOperand() or op_iterator, However, I can't find any method available for > destination operand. Someone suggests that instruction itself can represent > the destination operand. > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-January/037518.html

Am 05.03.2018 um 13:04 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr>: > > Le 28/02/2018 ? 22:23, Nicolas Kovacs a ?crit : >> So far, I've only been able to filter HTTP. >> >> Do any of you do transparent HTTPS filtering ? Any suggestions, >> advice, caveats, do's and don'ts ? > > After a week of trial and error, transparent HTTPS filtering