similar to: [LLVMdev] Can a Function Pass require a Module Pass?

Actually I am trying to run SPEC2006 through the Makefiles provided with LLVM Test Suite, so I think it should work properly... On 18 February 2013 15:49, Adhemerval Zanella <azanella at linux.vnet.ibm.com>wrote: > I can't really tell what is happening based on this output, but 'make' is > not the right way > to build SPECcpu2006 components. You need to do either by

Dear LLVMers, I am having trouble to run SPEC2006. I have checked in my log file that the spec root has been correctly found with ./configure, but when I try: make TEST=simple in the External folder I get the following error: make -C /home/izabela/svn_llvm/llvm/projects/test-suite/tools all \ ORIGINAL_CC="clang" \ ORIGINAL_CXX="clang" make[1]: Entering directory

I can't really tell what is happening based on this output, but 'make' is not the right way to build SPECcpu2006 components. You need to do either by using the supplied 'runspec' command with '-build' action directive or to issue the 'specmake' (which is a make adjusted by spec.org) on the build component folder. I can build 433.milc on PPC64 with clang without

Dear LLVMers, I am trying to measure the performance overhead (if any) of the canaries that clang inserts in the code. I would like to do this automatically, using the LLVM test infra-structure. However, I am not sure if that is possible. Could someone tell me which flags in the TEST.nightly.Makefile script, (or any other script) I must change to have this done? Usually I insert canaries with

Hello to all LLVM Developers. Given a object from a LiveInterval class, is there any way to know if this Live Interval is part or is inside a loop? Att -- Natanael Ramos Membro do corpo discente de Ciência da Computação pelo Instituto Federal de Minas Gerais - Campus Formiga -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Thanks Matthias I can also use the method intervalIsInOneMBB() from LiveIntervals class to relate a LiveInterval to a MachineBasicBlock, right? Em 04/09/2015 2:26 PM, "Matthias Braun" <mbraun at apple.com> escreveu: > There is no direct support for this, but you can use > LiveIntervalAnalysis::getMBBStartIndex()/getMBBEndIndex()/getMBBFromIndex() > to relate the

Hello to all LLVM Developers. The LLVM IR is in strict SSA form (i.e. every variable is defined before it is used along every path from the entry to exit point)? According to the documentation, currently the LLVM IR is in the SSA form, but I don't see additional information about *strict* SSA form. The strict SSA form provide opportunities of optimization in register allocation, because is

Good Afternoon. I am a Computer Science undergraduate student in Brazil and as completion of course work, I am developing an register allocator, using the infrastructure of the LLVM. To accomplish this task, I have based my implementation in allocators already implemented in LLVM. But a question came to me while I was researching in books and articles of compiler theory and own documentation of

I'm working on my project for completion undergraduate courses, consisting of an experimental analysis of registers allocation algorithms. For this task, I am using the set of tools from the LLVM project. However, I have read the documentation of the LLVM project and not yet found a way to put the pieces of the puzzle together. So far I know: - As passes work as engage them to LLVM and

Hello to all LLVM developers. I'm developing a register allocator using LLVM, my allocator has a local search phase: given a solution (assignment of virtual registers to physical registers or memory) generated in the first phase of the algorithm, some movements are applied to this solution in order to find a better solution. To apply such movements, I need to unassign a virtual register from

I've installed libvirt and also Virtual Box OSE hypervisor, in order to see if I could properly manage it through virsh. I could easily set up, start, pause, resume, shutdown and destroy the newly created domains, from a XML file. Then I was wondering how could I be able to spawn commands in the domain through virsh, and the command 'console' gave me a the thought that I should

Good afternoon. I am having trouble trying to set up shared folders in the guest VM using VirtualBox hypervisor. No matter what configuration is defined in my XML, it never works, I mean, no shared folder is added/specifyed, then, inside the guest, when I try to mount the folder, I always get a protocol error. If I use VirtualBoxManage, I can add/specify shared folders easily and mount it with

Hi, I have a problem with compiling the new revision, the file Sifsegv_gc makes a call to the file Sigsegv.cpp but returns as file already allocated: ... llvm [3]: Compiling for Debug + Asserts Sigsegv.cpp build (bytecode) llvm [3]: Compiling Sigsegv.ll to Sigsegv.bc for Debug + Asserts build ( bytecode) llvm [3]: Compiling Sigsegv.bc to Sigsegv.s for Debug + Asserts build llvm [3]: Compiling for

Hi all, here I have Windows 2000( Brazilian edition ) with SP2 installed and Winamp 2.77, with Nullsoft Vorbis Decoder 1.15b. Playing works perfect, with very low CPU usage. But if I pause or stop playing, CPU utilization goes to 100% and never gets out from there, only if I close Winamp or start playing again. I've seen this through Task Manager but looks like it's not his fault,

Dear Duncan, thank you very much. I have been able to use it now, via the following command line: clang -emit-llvm -c -fstack-protector canary.c -o canary.bc llc -print-before=stack-protector -print-after=stack-protector -o canary.s < canary.bc Thank you again, Izabela Maffra. On 26 January 2013 15:55, <llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Send LLVMdev mailing

I have tried everything to compile a new kernel on my 7.2 base system. I have used 2.4.13-ac6 and 2.4.13 w/ ext3 patch. I have compiled with ext3 built-in and with ext3 as module (with the initrd). I have a SCSI system so I have done the previous variations with both SCSI support built-in and modular (with the initrd). The error I get is: Remounting root filesystem in read-write mode: mount: no

Hello Dear R user, I want to conduct a Principal components analysis and I need to run two tests to check whether I can do it or not. I found how to run the KMO test, however i cannot find an R fonction for the Bartlett's test of sphericity. Does somebody know if it exists? Thanks for your help! Thibault [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

hi, I want to make some changes in ext3_unlink code to make undelete works, i read a lot about it and im planning to put this lines in that function: if (IS_UNDEL(inode)){ trash = ???? ext3_link(dir,dentry,trash); //make a hard link } somebody know how do i get a especific directory dentry using the ext3 functions ? (im planning to use the inode 6 or inode 11 that somebody said that usually

Hi, I'm doing a os course at federal university of minas gerais and my final work is to make a change in the linux os. My group decide to create a kind of undelete for ext3. We have already read about this in past threads. What I want to know is how ext3 deletes a file. What it deletes from the inode. thanks. ____________________________________________________________________ Carlos

Hi all, I need to plot a dendrogram, but I built a hclust object. Follow the code lines: >dendObject<-list(merge=merge,height=height,order=order,labels=labels,call="hclust(d=d)",method="complete", dist.method="euclidean") >class(dendObject)<-"hclust" >plclust(dendObject,axes=FALSE) Error in cl[[2]] : subscript out of bounds Anybody can help