Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] NVPTX CUDA_ERROR_NO_BINARY_FOR_GPU"
2013 Mar 01
0
[LLVMdev] NVPTX CUDA_ERROR_NO_BINARY_FOR_GPU
Timothy,
Those calls to compute grid intrinsics are definitely wrong. In ptx code they should end up into reading special registers, rather than function calls. Try to take some working example and figure out the LLVM IR differences between it and the result of your compiler.
- D.
----- Original message -----
> I've written a compiler that outputs PTX code, the result seems fairly
>
2013 Mar 01
4
[LLVMdev] NVPTX CUDA_ERROR_NO_BINARY_FOR_GPU
I'm building this with llvm-c, and accessing these intrinsics via calling
the intrinsic as if it were a function.
class F_SREG<string OpStr, NVPTXRegClass regclassOut, Intrinsic IntOp> :
NVPTXInst<(outs regclassOut:$dst), (ins),
OpStr,
[(set regclassOut:$dst, (IntOp))]>;
def INT_PTX_SREG_TID_X : F_SREG<"mov.u32 \t$dst, %tid.x;",
2013 Mar 01
0
[LLVMdev] NVPTX CUDA_ERROR_NO_BINARY_FOR_GPU
Ok, as I said, the most precise way to figure out what's wrong is to emit LLVM IR first (use clang -emit-llvm ...) and check out how it differs from working examples, for instance, nvptx regression tests.
----- Original message -----
> I'm building this with llvm-c, and accessing these intrinsics via calling
> the intrinsic as if it were a function.
>
> class F_SREG<string
2013 Mar 01
0
[LLVMdev] NVPTX CUDA_ERROR_NO_BINARY_FOR_GPU
Hi Timothy,
I'm not sure what you mean by this working for other intrinsics, but
in this case, I think you want the intrinsic name
llvm.nvvm.read.ptx.sreg.tid.x.
For me, this looks like:
%x = call i32 @llvm.nvvm.read.ptx.sreg.tid.x()
Pete
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Timothy Baldridge <tbaldridge at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm building this with llvm-c, and accessing these
2013 Mar 01
1
[LLVMdev] NVPTX CUDA_ERROR_NO_BINARY_FOR_GPU
The identifier INT_PTX_SREG_TID_X is the name of an instruction as the
back-end sees it, and has very little to do with the name you should use in
your IR. Your best bet is to look at the include/llvm/IR/IntrinsicsNVVM.td
file and see the definitions for each intrinsic. Then, the name mapping is
just:
int_foo_bar -> llvm.foo.bar()
int_ prefix becomes llvm., and all underscores turn into
2005 Feb 19
2
Warnings by functions mean(), median()
Hello,
following functions doesnt work correct with my data: median(), geo.mean().
My datafiles contain more than 10.000 lines and six columns from a
flow-cytometer-measurment. I need the arithmetic and geometric mean and
median. For the calculation of the geometric mean i wrote following
function:
fix(geo.mean)
function(x)
{
n<-length(x)
2017 Aug 22
4
How to benchmark speed of load/readRDS correctly
Dear all
I was thinking about efficient reading data into R and tried several ways to test if load(file.Rdata) or readRDS(file.rds) is faster. The files file.Rdata and file.rds contain the same data, the first created with save(d, ' file.Rdata', compress=F) and the second with saveRDS(d, ' file.rds', compress=F).
First I used the function microbenchmark() and was a astonished
2011 Aug 12
1
sapply to bind columns, with repeat?
Hi R-help,
I am working with US COOP network station data and the files are
concatenated in single rows for all years, but I need to pull these
apart into rows for each day. To do this, I need to extract part of
each row such as station id, year, mo, and repeat this against other
variables in the row (days). My problem is that there are repeated
values for each day, and the files are fixed width
2017 Aug 22
0
How to benchmark speed of load/readRDS correctly
The large value for maximum time may be due to garbage collection, which
happens periodically. E.g., try the following, where the
unlist(as.list()) creates a lot of garbage. I get a very large time every
102 or 51 iterations and a moderately large time more often
mb <- microbenchmark::microbenchmark({ x <- as.list(sin(1:5e5)); x <-
unlist(x) / cos(1:5e5) ; sum(x) }, times=1000)
2007 Jun 08
1
Need Help with robustbase package: fitnorm2 and plotnorm2
This is my first post requesting help to this mailing list. I am new
to R. My apologies for any breach in posting etiquette. I am new to
this language and just learning my way around. I am attempting to run
some sample code and and am confused by the error message:
Loading required package: rrcov
Error in fitNorm2(fdat[, "FSC-H"], fdat[, "SSC-H"], scalefac = ScaleFactor) :
2017 Aug 22
1
How to benchmark speed of load/readRDS correctly
Note that if you force a garbage collection each iteration the times are
more stable. However, on the average it is faster to let the garbage
collector decide when to leap into action.
mb_gc <- microbenchmark::microbenchmark(gc(), { x <- as.list(sin(1:5e5)); x
<- unlist(x) / cos(1:5e5) ; sum(x) }, times=1000,
control=list(order="inorder"))
with(mb_gc,
2018 Feb 07
6
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
I've landed the patch in r324449.
Before we merge this into two different Clang release branches and almost
immediately release one of them, I would really like someone to confirm
that this patch works well with the Linux kernel. David, if you're up for
that, it would be great. Alternatively, Guenter or someone else here can
help.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:59 PM Chandler Carruth
2015 Feb 03
2
[LLVMdev] Example for usage of LLVM/Clang/libclc
Hi,
My goal is to use Clang/LLVM/libclc to compile an OpenCL kernel and
eventually generate a PTX code. I already did this but I am not sure if the
PTX code I am generating is correct (is the one that is supposed to be
generated).
For example, currently,
In OpenCL : get_global_id(0) translates to
In LLVM : %call = tail call i32 @get_global_id(i32 0) which translates
to
In PTX:
2009 Aug 08
6
[LLVMdev] Profiling in LLVM Patch Followup 1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Dunbar wrote:
> Thanks, applied as r78247. Next? :)
Oh my, first he is lagging and now it's all a hurry :-)
Okay, here comes the next one.
I'm taking a short vacation next week so I will try to prepare 1 or 2 of
the next patches so that you can work on them as you have time.
Greetings, Andi
- --
2024 Jul 16
4
[Bug 1761] New: nft_fib checks only the main route table when iif is a slave of a master vrf interface
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
Bug ID: 1761
Summary: nft_fib checks only the main route table when iif is a
slave of a master vrf interface
Product: nftables
Version: 1.0.x
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
2001 May 03
1
Funk software Proxy
After your pointers I was able to get a little further on with my problem.
I installed the software on a Win95 machine to get the DLL's that I needed
and the original error message has gone. I can start the program, look at
preferences but when I try to connect to another machine there appears to
be a problem opening the prxgpxv.vxd file and the connection fails to
open..
2017 Aug 22
0
How to benchmark speed of load/readRDS correctly
You need to study how reading files works in your operating system. This question is not about R.
--
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
On August 22, 2017 5:53:09 AM PDT, raphael.felber at agroscope.admin.ch wrote:
>Dear all
>
>I was thinking about efficient reading data into R and tried several
>ways to test if load(file.Rdata) or readRDS(file.rds) is faster. The
2008 Nov 14
0
question on clustered barplot
Thank you all for your help about the encoding of my yahoo.gr.
I am sending you now the original data. Hope tha you can read them.
I am trying to create a clustered barplot for the following 2 variables:
> h$rocbiopsy1
聽 [1] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
聽[38] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
聽[75] 0 0 0 0 0
2018 Jun 01
3
Trust relationship between different domains
Hai Elias,
聽
Sorry for the late reply.
I do preffer the list, and i understand why you mailt my directly, but best is to keep this on the list.
The more eye that see this, the more chance you have on a reply.
I must say, i personaly dont use any trust relations ships. that was long ago when i used that, so im bit rusty here.
聽
Now, i see you are using my 4.8.2 packages. so you on debian. *( or
2018 Feb 07
0
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 06:20 +0000, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> I've landed the patch in r324449.
>
> Before we merge this into two different Clang release branches and
> almost immediately release one of them, I would really like someone
> to confirm that this patch works well with the Linux kernel. David,
> if you're up for that, it would be great. Alternatively, Guenter