similar to: [LLVMdev] GSOC Projects

Renato, Actually I wanted to send GSOC email about the open projects tonight. So, yes - please add them to the corresponding ideas pages. On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Feb 27, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have some ideas for GSOC projects using

Ok, I've added the LNT statistics project, I think it's better to add the Clang stuff to http://clang.llvm.org/OpenProjects.html right? cheers, --renato On 27 February 2013 20:17, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info>wrote: > Renato, > > Actually I wanted to send GSOC email about the open projects tonight. > So, yes - please add them to the corresponding

On Feb 27, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have some ideas for GSOC projects using LLVM, where should I post them? Please add them to llvm-www/OpenProjects.html. -Chris > > Idea #1: llvm-env > > A simple tool, with little or no dependency on LLVM itself, that will investigate a target architecture by probing

Here's another project idea: We really have needed a `clang-config` for a long time; it's absence makes building programs depending on Clang a pain. -- Sean Silva

Daniel, Tobias, Renato and myself have been looking a little bit at the potential underlying reason for why http://llvm.org/perf/ is instable, and have found some clues. I want to share them here to give people with more experience in the frameworks used by LNT (flask, sqlalchemy, wsgi, .) a chance to check if our reasoning below seems plausible. Daniel noticed the following backtrace in the

Hi, The new LNT server instance http://lnt.llvm.org seems to fail in many cases. Any entrance to a 'Run page' (e.g. http://lnt.llvm.org/db_default/v4/nts/62475) and lately also many perf bots result submissions (e.g. http://lab.llvm.org:8014/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt-perf/builds/2262/steps/test-suite/logs/stdio ) fails with: "500 Internal Server Error". Any ideas? Thanks,

All, I'm curious to know if anyone is interested in tracking performance (compile-time and/or execution-time) from a community perspective? This is a much loftier goal then just supporting build bots. If so, I'd be happy to propose a BOF at the upcoming Dev Meeting. Chad

The run page problem were triggered by one of my commits (sorry) and should be mitigated now, see the thread at http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115971.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115971.html> I don't know about the submission problems, could they just an occasional network problem or are they a common phenomenon? Chris did some

Dear all, I recently started to see internal server errors when submitting perf results to lnt.llvm.org http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer/builds/1154/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/stdio nt /home/grosser/buildslave/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer/tests/nt/build/sample-0/report.simple.csv

Hi, I have recently moved the clang-native-arm-lnt-perf bot from the nt producer to the test-suite producer. It seems to be working fine but it doesn't manage to submit the results to http://lnt.llvm.org/submitRun. If you scroll down to the bottom of [1], you can see this error message: 2017-08-28 07:06:32: submitting result to 'http://lnt.llvm.org/submitRun' error: lnt server:

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 21:55, Tobias Grosser via llvm-dev wrote: > This started since about 1-2 weeks, I guess. I am not sure about it > either, but seems unfortunate. Maybe we run into some kind of timeout? And another one :( http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly/builds/1986/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/stdio 2017-08-03 00:24:44 CRITICAL: Results were not

Great, good to know it's not just a problem with our bot. Thanks! On 28 August 2017 at 16:24, Chris Matthews <cmatthews5 at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Diana, > > I have seen that issue on some other bots too. I will fix it this week. It is something about how MySQL treats character encodings differently than Postgres. We are checking for the value in the table beforehand, and this

Hi, So, I owe you all an apology. I was totally unaware that the llvm.org server, running at UIUC, was still in operation and hosting an active LNT instance. I was under the assumption the LNT server ran elsewhere. As a result, the ability for the LNT bots to submit run information to the "old" LNT server is now gone. I am very sorry for this oversight. In speaking with Chris

Hi James/Chris, You guys have done this before, so I'm guessing you can help me understand what's going on. If my buildbot config is: jobs=2, nt_flags=['--cflag', '-mcpu=cortex-a15', '--use-perf', '--threads=1', '--build-threads=4'] It uses -j4 for build, -j2 for running the tests:

Actually I just remember LNT has a page for viewing the log: http://lnt.llvm.org/log ... OperationalError: (OperationalError) (2006, 'MySQL server has gone away') 'SELECT `NT_Run`.`ID` AS `NT_Run_ID`, `NT_Run`.`MachineID` AS `NT_Run_MachineID`, `NT_Run`.`OrderID` AS `NT_Run_OrderID`, `NT_Run`.`ImportedFrom` AS `NT_Run_ImportedFrom`, `NT_Run`.`StartTime` AS `NT_Run_StartTime`,

Is there a reason why existing buildbots are not generating LNT results? On 2013-01-28, at 11:37 AM, David Blaikie wrote: They're just build bots running LNT - check the build bot configuration code in the zorg llvm project repository. You'll probably need to do some work to get a machine quiet enough to have reliable/useful performance results, though On Jan 28, 2013 8:33 AM,

Is O3-vectorize redundant now that the loop vectorizer is enabled by default? On 2013-01-28, at 12:25 PM, David Blaikie wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Redmond, Paul <paul.redmond at intel.com> wrote: >> Is there a reason why existing buildbots are not generating LNT results? > > Those running LNT should be/are: > >

On 21 Apr 2016, at 17:44, Sergey Yakoushkin <sergey.yakoushkin at gmail.com<mailto:sergey.yakoushkin at gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Kristof, The way we use LNT, we would run different configuration (e.g. -O3 vs -Os) as different "machines" in LNT's model. O2/O3 is indeed bad example. We're also using different machines for Os/O3 - such parameters apply to all

Another suggestion: a web service that would allow you to submit a test build and it would provide you feedback on deviations from known good for that target. I know a lot of people keep two trees around for this purpose, and I'd personally like to ditch the duplicate if I could. -- Chris On Mar 21, 2008, at 9:22 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri wrote: > Hello every body, > Thank you all

Hi, I've lately been wondering where benchmarks for LLVM-generated binaries are hosted, and whether they're tracked over time. I'm asking because I'm thinking of where to put some benchmarks I've written using the open source Google benchmarking library [0] to test certain costs of XRay-instrumented binaries, the XRay runtime, and other related measurements (effect of