similar to: [LLVMdev] Phabricator homepage "UNRECOVERABLE FATAL ERROR"

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Phabricator homepage "UNRECOVERABLE FATAL ERROR""

2013 Feb 24
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator homepage "UNRECOVERABLE FATAL ERROR"
Yes. I'm seeing the problem. The error text is: Cannot override final method LiskDAO::loadOneRelative() /srv/http/phabricator/src/applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepository.php:7 On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: >> >> When accessing
2013 Feb 24
0
[LLVMdev] Phabricator homepage "UNRECOVERABLE FATAL ERROR"
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > When accessing the Phabricator homepage > <http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/> I see: > > <http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/P53>. > > The rest of the site seems to be fine (e.g. I can access that paste > fine, and all Differential links that I see on the list work fine), > but
2013 Feb 25
0
[LLVMdev] Phabricator homepage "UNRECOVERABLE FATAL ERROR"
I filed an upstream bug: https://secure.phabricator.com/T2594 On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Anton Korobeynikov < anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > Yes. I'm seeing the problem. > > The error text is: > > Cannot override final method LiskDAO::loadOneRelative() > > > /srv/http/phabricator/src/applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepository.php:7 >
2013 Feb 25
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator homepage "UNRECOVERABLE FATAL ERROR"
The problem should be fixed (according to upstream it's a bad apc version that is part of archlinux). Let me know if the error persists... Thanks! /Manuel On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > I filed an upstream bug: > https://secure.phabricator.com/T2594 > > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Anton Korobeynikov < >
2013 Feb 25
0
[LLVMdev] Phabricator homepage "UNRECOVERABLE FATAL ERROR"
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > Let me know if the error persists... > Still broken on my end. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130225/46d34b42/attachment.html>
2013 Feb 25
1
[LLVMdev] Phabricator homepage "UNRECOVERABLE FATAL ERROR"
Can you give it another spin? Thx On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > >> >> Let me know if the error persists... >> > > Still broken on my end. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
2008 Jun 02
1
Ancova: formula with a common intercept
I have some data with two categorises plus/minus (p53) and a particular time (Time) and the outcome is a continuous vairable (Result). I set up a maximum model. ancova <- lm(Result~Time*p53) > summary(ancova) .. Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) 0.05919 0.55646 0.106 0.916 Time -0.02134 0.01785 -1.195 0.241 p53plus
2014 May 19
2
[LLVMdev] phabricator says "this commit is still importing"
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Alex Bradbury <asb at asbradbury.org> wrote: > On 12 May 2014 08:35, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> > wrote: > >> > >> It seems that we cannot execute svn commands against llvm-project any > >> more: > >> $ svn
2014 Dec 12
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
On Fri Dec 12 2014 at 12:55:01 PM İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > Can you point me at an example? I've spot checked stuff and cannot see > > anything out of the ordinary... > > This is only visible in GMail for me but looks like Phabricator is now >
2015 Jul 08
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
Ah, thanks, interesting - investigating On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:37 PM Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 8 July 2015 at 11:31, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > Those seem to be comments by the original author? Is this a problem? > > Not always, see http://reviews.llvm.org/D10676 or any other. > > I can only see the commenter
2014 May 12
2
[LLVMdev] phabricator says "this commit is still importing"
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > It seems that we cannot execute svn commands against llvm-project any more: > $ svn diff -r 208457:208458 'http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project' > svn: access to '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default' forbidden > > Tanja, any idea what changed? > (Tanya, sorry for messing up the name,
2013 Jul 08
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator down
We should be back up - please let me know if anything doesn't work as expected... Cheers, /Manuel On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > Just as a tiny update, Manuel is actively working on it, but a small issue > has turned into a larger issue... stay tuned... > > > On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek
2013 Jul 11
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator down
Yep, sorry, we ran out of space on the instance's database volume. I'll update this once we're back up. On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Justin Holewinski < justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > Is Phabricator down again? I'm starting to see the following: > > [Rendering Exception] Multiple exceptions during processing and rendering. > -
2014 Dec 11
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
Heya, I'll look into it first thing tomorrow - probably a problem with the encoding settings. On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 9:17:40 PM Robinson, Paul < Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote: > What I'm seeing is that Phabricator emails double-space *everything* > (not just the diffs). > > --paulr > > > > *From:* cfe-dev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu
2015 Jul 02
3
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
This might be slightly off topic, but I'd really like a way to be able to run the buildbots off a Phabricator Diff before committing. On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > Unfortunately threading will be broken for changes currently under review > (new patches shouldn't have the problem). > I'm very sorry for this inconvenience
2014 Dec 11
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 2:16:00 AM Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Jonathan Roelofs < >> jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: >> >>> I think the send-email part of phab has yet to come back up. >>>
2012 Oct 18
3
[LLVMdev] Announcement: Phabricator for code reviews
Thanks, I've created https://secure.phabricator.com/T1930. Until that is resolved I'll create accounts for anybody who doesn't want to use OAuth - just shoot me a mail. Cheers, /Manuel On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > Manuel, > > On Oct 18, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > I
2014 Dec 10
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
Phab is back up - it's still a little slow (the mysql database we use is doing some cleanups). On Wed Dec 10 2014 at 5:07:07 PM suyog sarda <sardask01 at gmail.com> wrote: > And i was thinking something wrong with my proxy configuration :P > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > >> Heya, >> >> if you wonder
2015 Jul 09
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
I filed a ticket with sendgrid. Since we're paying them money nowadays, I hope they'll answer quickly On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:05 AM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > aaaaaand you're on the bounce list again. I'm going to delete you again, > but I'd be curious what the problem is... > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:50 PM Adam Nemet <anemet at
2014 Dec 11
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com > wrote: > I think the send-email part of phab has yet to come back up. > Yes, restarting it would be very helpful. > > > Cheers, > > Jon > > > On 12/10/14 1:59 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote: > >> Phab is back up - it's still a little slow (the mysql database we use is