Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Phabricator homepage "UNRECOVERABLE FATAL ERROR""
2013 Feb 24
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator homepage "UNRECOVERABLE FATAL ERROR"
Yes. I'm seeing the problem.
The error text is:
Cannot override final method LiskDAO::loadOneRelative()
/srv/http/phabricator/src/applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepository.php:7
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote:
>>
>> When accessing
2013 Feb 24
0
[LLVMdev] Phabricator homepage "UNRECOVERABLE FATAL ERROR"
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote:
> When accessing the Phabricator homepage
> <http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/> I see:
>
> <http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/P53>.
>
> The rest of the site seems to be fine (e.g. I can access that paste
> fine, and all Differential links that I see on the list work fine),
> but
2013 Feb 25
0
[LLVMdev] Phabricator homepage "UNRECOVERABLE FATAL ERROR"
I filed an upstream bug:
https://secure.phabricator.com/T2594
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Anton Korobeynikov <
anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
> Yes. I'm seeing the problem.
>
> The error text is:
>
> Cannot override final method LiskDAO::loadOneRelative()
>
>
> /srv/http/phabricator/src/applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepository.php:7
>
2013 Feb 25
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator homepage "UNRECOVERABLE FATAL ERROR"
The problem should be fixed (according to upstream it's a bad apc version
that is part of archlinux).
Let me know if the error persists...
Thanks!
/Manuel
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
> I filed an upstream bug:
> https://secure.phabricator.com/T2594
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Anton Korobeynikov <
>
2013 Feb 25
0
[LLVMdev] Phabricator homepage "UNRECOVERABLE FATAL ERROR"
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>
> Let me know if the error persists...
>
Still broken on my end.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130225/46d34b42/attachment.html>
2013 Feb 25
1
[LLVMdev] Phabricator homepage "UNRECOVERABLE FATAL ERROR"
Can you give it another spin? Thx
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Let me know if the error persists...
>>
>
> Still broken on my end.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was
2008 Jun 02
1
Ancova: formula with a common intercept
I have some data with two categorises plus/minus (p53) and a particular
time (Time) and the outcome is a continuous vairable (Result). I set up
a maximum model.
ancova <- lm(Result~Time*p53)
> summary(ancova)
..
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 0.05919 0.55646 0.106 0.916
Time -0.02134 0.01785 -1.195 0.241
p53plus
2014 May 19
2
[LLVMdev] phabricator says "this commit is still importing"
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Alex Bradbury <asb at asbradbury.org> wrote:
> On 12 May 2014 08:35, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> It seems that we cannot execute svn commands against llvm-project any
> >> more:
> >> $ svn
2014 Dec 12
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
On Fri Dec 12 2014 at 12:55:01 PM İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
> > Can you point me at an example? I've spot checked stuff and cannot see
> > anything out of the ordinary...
>
> This is only visible in GMail for me but looks like Phabricator is now
>
2015 Jul 08
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
Ah, thanks, interesting - investigating
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:37 PM Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>
wrote:
> On 8 July 2015 at 11:31, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
> > Those seem to be comments by the original author? Is this a problem?
>
> Not always, see http://reviews.llvm.org/D10676 or any other.
>
> I can only see the commenter
2014 May 12
2
[LLVMdev] phabricator says "this commit is still importing"
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
> It seems that we cannot execute svn commands against llvm-project any more:
> $ svn diff -r 208457:208458 'http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project'
> svn: access to '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default' forbidden
>
> Tanja, any idea what changed?
>
(Tanya, sorry for messing up the name,
2013 Jul 08
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator down
We should be back up - please let me know if anything doesn't work as
expected...
Cheers,
/Manuel
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote:
> Just as a tiny update, Manuel is actively working on it, but a small issue
> has turned into a larger issue... stay tuned...
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek
2013 Jul 11
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator down
Yep, sorry, we ran out of space on the instance's database volume. I'll
update this once we're back up.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Justin Holewinski <
justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is Phabricator down again? I'm starting to see the following:
>
> [Rendering Exception] Multiple exceptions during processing and rendering.
> -
2014 Dec 11
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
Heya, I'll look into it first thing tomorrow - probably a problem with the
encoding settings.
On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 9:17:40 PM Robinson, Paul <
Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote:
> What I'm seeing is that Phabricator emails double-space *everything*
> (not just the diffs).
>
> --paulr
>
>
>
> *From:* cfe-dev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu
2015 Jul 02
3
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
This might be slightly off topic, but I'd really like a way to be able to
run the buildbots off a Phabricator Diff before committing.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately threading will be broken for changes currently under review
> (new patches shouldn't have the problem).
> I'm very sorry for this inconvenience
2014 Dec 11
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
> On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 2:16:00 AM Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Jonathan Roelofs <
>> jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think the send-email part of phab has yet to come back up.
>>>
2012 Oct 18
3
[LLVMdev] Announcement: Phabricator for code reviews
Thanks, I've created https://secure.phabricator.com/T1930.
Until that is resolved I'll create accounts for anybody who doesn't want to
use OAuth - just shoot me a mail.
Cheers,
/Manuel
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote:
> Manuel,
>
> On Oct 18, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>
> I
2014 Dec 10
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
Phab is back up - it's still a little slow (the mysql database we use is
doing some cleanups).
On Wed Dec 10 2014 at 5:07:07 PM suyog sarda <sardask01 at gmail.com> wrote:
> And i was thinking something wrong with my proxy configuration :P
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>
>> Heya,
>>
>> if you wonder
2015 Jul 09
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
I filed a ticket with sendgrid. Since we're paying them money nowadays, I
hope they'll answer quickly
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:05 AM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
> aaaaaand you're on the bounce list again. I'm going to delete you again,
> but I'd be curious what the problem is...
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:50 PM Adam Nemet <anemet at
2014 Dec 11
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com
> wrote:
> I think the send-email part of phab has yet to come back up.
>
Yes, restarting it would be very helpful.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jon
>
>
> On 12/10/14 1:59 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
>
>> Phab is back up - it's still a little slow (the mysql database we use is