similar to: [LLVMdev] Emitting recursive types

I'm building a StructType without a body using StructType *StructType::create(LLVMContext &Context, StringRef Name); and then later adding a body to with setBody(). It starts of isOpaque() == true, and isSized() == false, and after I add the body, isOpaque() == false, but isSized() is still false. If I create a StructType using StructType * StructType ::create(LLVMContext

Hi Chris, > 3. Clang/dragonegg need to adapt to the new API (help appreciated!) what needs to be done exactly? Ciao, Duncan.

With primitive types, I can interchange literal usage and type aliases in IR: %mytype = type i32 define void @foo(%mytype* %ptr) { %t1 = load *%mytype** %ptr store i32 *%t1*, *i32** %ptr ret void } But for structs, I cannot: %mytype = type { i32, i32 } define void @foo(%mytype* %ptr) { %t1 = load *%mytype** %ptr store* { i32, i32 }* %t1, *{ i32, i32 }** %ptr ret void }

On 25 June 2011 13:00, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: >> 3. Clang/dragonegg need to adapt to the new API (help appreciated!) > > what needs to be done exactly? Background info: http://www.nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/TypeSystemRewrite.txt As I understand it, PATypeHolder, OpaqueType and the Module's TypeSymbolTable are gone. Instead, StructTypes can optionally be

Justin, http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#structure-type "Identified types can be recursive, can be opaqued, and are never uniqued." Do you think it would be less descriptive? "Identified type, aka named llvm::StructType, is never uniqued against other identified types nor literal types, aka unnamed StructType(s)." ? See also;

Hi! In Line 230 of llvm\Support\TypeBuilder.h is support for void*: /// void* is disallowed in LLVM types, but it occurs often enough in C code that /// we special case it. template<> class TypeBuilder<void*, false> : public TypeBuilder<types::i<8>*, false> {}; If would be cool if the same thing can be added for const void*: template<> class

Hello, I'm trying to change the default behavior for how structures are passed to functions to use pass-by-value. Currently LLVM's default behavior is to pass structures by reference. I'm not disputing the benefits of this but I really want to change the default behavior for experimentation purposes. To this end I've changed the code in DefaultABIInfo::classifyArgumentType() to

Dear R-users, I am trying to use the grep function to test whether a particular string is of the form "n.../mydir/myfile.mytype.myext". Anything between n and mytype could vary, and anything after mytype could vary. I tried to proceed by steps to build my regular expression... but I do not really understand why the last call of the following code do not work. Any help would be

Hi, On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Martinez, Javier E < javier.e.martinez at intel.com> wrote: > Hello,**** > > ** ** > > I’m trying to change the default behavior for how structures are passed to > functions to use pass-by-value. Currently LLVM’s default behavior is to > pass structures by reference. I’m not disputing the benefits of this but I > really want to

As far as I can tell, when you construct a type using the support library StructType::get, you have to pass in a list of types. How can you make a Recursive type by passing in a pointer to the type you are constucting. An example where something really simple like the line below was output would be perfect. %struct.linked_list = type { %struct.linked_list*, %sbyte* } Thanks for any help,

The first draft of the LLVM 3.0 release notes now done, in llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.html (the web page isn't autoupdating at the moment). Please take a look and make corrections or enhancements as you see fit. There are still a few things that I need from specific people (marked with XXX's): - BillW is writing a blog about exception handling. - The llvm.expect intrinsic isn't documented

On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, John Carrino wrote: > As far as I can tell, when you construct a type using the support > library StructType::get, you have to pass in a list of types. How can > you make a Recursive type by passing in a pointer to the type you are > constucting. > > An example where something really simple like the line below was output > would be perfect. > >

Dear R users, Suppose I have the following data.frame: myID myType myNum1 myNum2 myNum3 a Single 10 11 12 b Single 15 25 35 c Double 22 33 44 d Double 4 6 8 and I want to have new records: myID myType myNum1 myNum2 myNum3 e Single 12.5 18

>> An example where something really simple like the line below was output >> would be perfect. >> >> %struct.linked_list = type { %struct.linked_list*, %sbyte* } > > Use something like this: > > PATypeHolder StructTy = OpaqueType::get(); > std::vector<const Type*> Elts; > Elts.push_back(PointerType::get(StructTy)); >

Hi all, I''m struggling with the following: I have a defined type wrapped in a class: class myclass { define mytype(bla) { file { "blabla": .... } exec { "blablabla": ... } } } And I access the defined type in my other class by doing this: class otherclass { include myclass myclass::mytype { "alb": ... } # and here I want to

On Nov 28, 2011, at 7:20 AM, Joe Abbey wrote: > Internal API changes mentioned the Type system changes twice... merging. It should now read: > > The biggest and most pervasive change is that the type system has been rewritten: PATypeHolder and OpaqueType are gone, and all APIs deal with Type* instead of const Type*. If you need to create recursive structures, then create a named

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Vikram S. Adve<vadve at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > For my introductory Compiler Construction class, I have been giving > the students a project to write a simple compiler for a toy, single- > inheritance object-oriented language.  We give them a set of classes > implementing an AST for the language and a type checker as well.  The > students write

You need a pointer-to-function type, but FunctionType just gives you a function type. Use PointerType::getUnqual(FunctionType::get(...)). Or TypeBuilder<char (*func)(void*), false>::get(context) from Support/TypeBuilder.h. On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Salomon Brys <salomon.brys at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi all. > I would like to declare a function that takes a function pointer

Hi, Sorry I fat fingered an earlier send in the previous email. I was trying to say: On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: >> +1 Exactly this. >> I don't think C programmer will not understand using. The "=" makes it much >> simpler to read, even if it is the first time you see it, which is not the >>

Hi All, I'm new to LLVM and I'm having a coding problem. I'm creating a GlobalVariable that contains a StructType that contains a Function. The function returns i32 and takes two i32's. Here is my code: GlobalVariable* retrieved = module->getGlobalVariable("myGV"); ... Constant* result = ConstantExpr::getGetElementPtr(retrieved, indices); How do I get my Function