Displaying 20 results from an estimated 60000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] question about llvm libc++ build"
2014 Sep 30
4
[LLVMdev] Can libc++ build for arm cross compiler?
The following web say the libc++abi is ready on arm.http://libcxxabi.llvm.org/spec.html
I try to build libc++ and libc++abi for host x86_64(linux) and target arm(linux) but fail.I have read the web http://llvm.org/docs/HowToCrossCompileLLVM.html
Does anyone know whether it's available for my need? If you know how to build, what is the build options you use?
Best regards
cschen
--------------
2015 Feb 03
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Progress report on CMake build system's ability to replace autoconf
On Feb 3, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2015 Feb 3, at 13:26, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 3, 2015, at 1:06 PM, Jonathan Roelofs <jroelofs.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/3/15 12:08 PM, Chris Bieneman wrote:
2014 Oct 03
3
[LLVMdev] Can libc++ build for arm cross compiler?
On 10/3/14 10:16 AM, Dan Albert wrote:
>>
>> I try to build libc++ and libc++abi for host x86_64(linux) and target
>> arm(linux) but fail.
>>
>
> Failing in what way? If this isn't working out of the box, we've done
> something wrong.
Yeah, it would help to know more specifics about where you're getting stuck.
>
> jroelofs might know more...
For
2013 Dec 12
1
[LLVMdev] libc++.so in default binary distribution.
Hi to all,
when I download the clang/llvm officila binaries, I found the libc++
headers under lib directory,
but I didn't found libc++.so.
Why you ship libc++ headers but no shared library?
Thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131212/36204500/attachment.html>
2014 May 01
2
[LLVMdev] [ exception_ptr ] libcxx doesn't cope well with libcxxabi under linux
Since the original buildit script doesn't cover my needs I switched to a custom but really similar script, in the meantime I also got the habit
to dig for new flags and support and the __GLIBCXX__ define was hiding
some of this errors. I see that other linux-based operating system offer this kind of support and they even use the same core components of my
GNU/Linux distribution.
You are
2012 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] Unable to build PBQP/Graph.h with libc++
On 20.10.2012, at 22:47, Jordan Rose <jordan_rose at apple.com> wrote:
> Hi, everyone. Today I was trying to build LLVM with libc++ and C++11 enabled, and I ran into this:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10065384/instantiation-of-a-list-with-an-incomplete-type-in-a-typedef
>
> Basically, PBQP/Graph.h forward-declares classes, then tries to get iterators for
2012 Oct 23
0
[LLVMdev] Unable to build PBQP/Graph.h with libc++
I think I've fixed this issue with r166484. Let me know if you run into
further problems building PBQP with libc++ and C++11.
- Lang.
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a known issue with the current PBQP data structures. I'm working
> on an overhaul of the PBQP allocator at the moment which should address
> this.
>
>
2012 Oct 20
3
[LLVMdev] Unable to build PBQP/Graph.h with libc++
Hi, everyone. Today I was trying to build LLVM with libc++ and C++11 enabled, and I ran into this:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10065384/instantiation-of-a-list-with-an-incomplete-type-in-a-typedef
Basically, PBQP/Graph.h forward-declares classes, then tries to get iterators for std::lists of those classes. This is technically undefined behavior. I tried fudging with the order of
2012 Oct 20
2
[LLVMdev] Unable to build PBQP/Graph.h with libc++
This is a known issue with the current PBQP data structures. I'm working on
an overhaul of the PBQP allocator at the moment which should address this.
- Lang.
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com>wrote:
>
> On 20.10.2012, at 22:47, Jordan Rose <jordan_rose at apple.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi, everyone. Today I was trying to build LLVM
2012 Dec 01
1
llvm / clang does not build with new libc++
Hello,
since r243376 clang does not build with new libc++ anymore. Log attached.
Reverting back lib/libc++ or not using libc++ fixes it.
System: stable/9 amd64 r243742
WITHOUT_LIB32=yes
WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes
WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL=yes
WITH_CLANG=yes
WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS=yes
WITH_CLANG_IS_CC=yes
WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS=yes
CPUTYPE?=athlon64-sse3
CXXFLAGS+= -stdlib=libc++ -std=c++11
CC=clang
CPP=clang-cpp
2016 Mar 26
0
llvm build failed while Linking CXX shared library ../../../lib/libc++.so
Hi Ioannis,
If you only want the clang static analyzer, there is no need to check out and build libc++ as part of the process. The rest of the build can just use the system C++ library, which will be libstdc++ on Xubuntu.
That said, without the full build log, it is hard to say what went wrong. Specifically, which references were undefined?
-Dimitry
> On 26 Mar 2016, at 16:04, Ioannis
2014 Oct 07
2
[LLVMdev] Can libc++ build for arm cross compiler?
Hi cschen,
It seems that libunwind (the one included in libcxxabi) is mandatory at the
moment. Use the second build command instead:
$ CROSS_COMPILING=arm ENABLE_LIBUNWIND=1 ./scripts/compile-all.sh
Logan
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:32 PM, gamma_chen <gamma_chen at yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
> After do "sudo apt-get update", the following are pass.
>
> Install the
2009 Oct 09
0
[LLVMdev] fudging the top-level Makefile
On Oct 8, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Stuart Hastings wrote:
> Currently, to get LLVM to build "Apple-style," it's necessary to
> copy two files (utils/buildit/GNUmakefile and utils/buildit/
> build_llvm) into the top-level directory.
Why not:
$ RC_ARCHS="x86" make
echo Apple Build.
Apple Build.
$ make
echo Standard Build
Standard Build
$ cat Makefile
ifneq
2016 Mar 26
2
llvm build failed while Linking CXX shared library ../../../lib/libc++.so
Hello everybody,
I am very new to llvm and I am struggling to install it on my 15.10 Xubuntu
with kernel 4.2.0-34-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP x86_64 GNU/Linux.
I essentially intend to use the clang static analyzer, but it seems that I
have to build it on top of llvm and clang.
Unfortunately I run into the following problem.
CXX shared library ../../../lib/libc++.so
at around 52% of the procedure
2016 Mar 28
0
llvm build failed while Linking CXX shared library ../../../lib/libc++.so
Hi Ioannis,
Just delete the projects/libcxx directory, then rebuild from scratch. You should only need to checkout llvm (in the top level directory) and cfe (into the tools/clang subdirectory).
-Dimitry
> On 29 Mar 2016, at 00:08, Ioannis Koukoulis <i.g.koukoulis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Dimitry,
>
> I do not particularly need to build libc++ from the package. Is the
2009 Oct 09
2
[LLVMdev] fudging the top-level Makefile
On Oct 8, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Stuart Hastings wrote:
>> Currently, to get LLVM to build "Apple-style," it's necessary to
>> copy two files (utils/buildit/GNUmakefile and utils/buildit/
>> build_llvm) into the top-level directory.
>
> Why not:
>
> $ RC_ARCHS="x86" make
> echo Apple Build.
2014 Sep 30
2
[LLVMdev] Can libc++ build for arm cross compiler?
Hi cschen,
Here are the test scripts which I written when I was developing ARM
exception handling support:
https://github.com/loganchien/libcxx-scripts
The script should work on Debian wheezy (cross-compiling from amd64 to
armhf.)
In general, here are the necessary steps:
1. Get a working arm-linux-gnueabihf gcc/g++ toolchain (for the headers and
libraries)
2. Setup the include search path
2007 Jul 11
1
[LLVMdev] -arch option ignored?
On Jul 10, 2007, at 10:41 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Leo Fink wrote:
>>> You need to build darwin driver to use -arch. Try using build_gcc
>>> script to configure and build llvm-gcc.
>>
>> Well, I guess this task exceeds my expertise. I just thought there
>> was some obvious mistake I made because a lot of people might be
>> using
2016 Mar 29
1
llvm build failed while Linking CXX shared library ../../../lib/libc++.so
Hi Dimitry, this definitely worked. I am passed by the linking errors
regarding libc++ or similar. My build stopped now at 95% while linking a
clang extra, I am not pretty sure which because i do not have my laptop,
possible the clang-rename, if such exists.
No undefined references here, however, my hdd's free space run out, so this
might be the cause. I have to move or expand now, alas!! The
2009 Oct 08
4
[LLVMdev] fudging the top-level Makefile
Currently, to get LLVM to build "Apple-style," it's necessary to copy
two files (utils/buildit/GNUmakefile and utils/buildit/build_llvm)
into the top-level directory. This is generally a PITA inside of
Apple. (I'll spare you the gory details. :-)
I'd like to fix this for Apple, and I want to avoid compromising
anybody else's build system. I've never used