similar to: [LLVMdev] Process the initializers of a C++ class properly

I was looking at the ClassTemplatePartialSpecializationDecl::getInstantiatedFromMember documentation, in the included example it says: "(..) the instantiation of Outer<float>::Inner<int*> will end up instantiating the partial specialization Outer<float>::Inner<U*> (...)". To understand the concept better, I dumped the AST for the following code:

Hi I am using clang-6 to compile this C++ code and I see a strange temporary variable allocated at expression address 0x7ff1131536e8. If I change the ternary operator at line 483 to an if-else, the temporary is not allocated. Thanks Variables: ========= FFMPEGVideoCapture ffmpeg_video_capture_; cv::VideoCapture opencv_video_capture_; Function: ======== bool

llvm[1]: Compiling APFloat.cpp for Release+Asserts build clang: TargetInfo.cpp:1778: llvm::Type *GetX86_64ByValArgumentPair(llvm::Type *, llvm::Type *, const llvm::TargetData &): Assertion `Lo->isIntegerTy() && "Invalid/unknown lo type"' failed. 0 clang 0x0000000001c132ef 1 clang 0x0000000001c13804 2 libpthread.so.0 0x00002ba7d7eaec60 3

Dear All, I am trying to use the glmmBUGS package with OpenBUGS under Linux. Here is a short list of code I modified from the diseasemapping package document: ---------------------------------------- library(diseasemapping) data(popdata) data(casedata) model = getRates(casedata, popdata, ~age*sex, breaks=seq(0, 90, by=10) ) ontario = getSMR(popdata,model, casedata) spplot(ontario,

I''ve just cloned my rails app onto another PC, and I''m having a problem getting the database set up. I''ve tried rake db:migrate, then db:create and also db:reset, but I keep getting an SQLException "no such table". It seems this is due to a line in an initializer which accesses one of my tables. Why do the db:* tasks run the initializers ? Do I need to move

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith < dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > > > On 2015 Jan 14, at 07:58, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> > wrote: > > > >> > >> On 2015 Jan 13, at 23:59, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015

Hi All, Another nls related problem (for background, I'm migrating a complicated modelling package from S-plus to R). Below I've reduced this to the minimum necessary to demonstrate my problem (I think); the real situation is more complicated. Two similar selfStart functions, ssA and ssB. The 'initial' function for ssB modifies its arguments a little and then calls getInital

Hi In rails 2.0 config/initializers directory is there. I am using 1.2.5 So for initializing some gem (for example) in which file can I do that? Thanks in advance Sijo -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this

I am upgrading an app from Rails 2.3.8 to Rails 3.0. I am finding that the initializers in the initializers directory do not seem to load. Is there any way to configure it. In general, what are the new load procedures for Rails 3? Thanks. Bharat -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:

I got my S3 credentials defined in my production.rb, linkwise to this heroku post <https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/paperclip-s3>. However when I''m testing it on Heroku, I get this error in my logs: "ArgumentError (missing required :bucket option)". What could be wrong? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on

Help! in my rails controllers, there is a ''Admin'' namespace. (My the structure of the controllers dir is like this : app/controllers: home_controller.rb ... admin/posts_controller.rb admin/pages_controller.rb The ''Admin'' will automatically become a Module constant (I know it from the console: ''puts Admin => Module''); And in my

I created a "config/initializers/tasks.rb" In it I have the following is all: logger.info("Running tasks") However nothing is logged or run. Am I missing something? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

*sheepish grin* Nevermind. :P -j -- Joel Stanley * jstanley at cs.uiuc.edu

On 8/20/07, Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru> wrote: > Hello, Tomas. > > > So far I have only been using LLVM at the user level. And I'm not sure > > how this problem should be solved. It would be really nice if there > > was a way to specify something like: > > ******************************************************************* > >

On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote: > I'm working on a LLVM based compiler for the D programming language by > Walter Bright. Nifty. > D allows static arrays up to 16MB in size. I'm initializing global > static arrays with a constant initializer. But D requires that (per > default) static arrays are initialized with the default initializer > for the

> > D allows static arrays up to 16MB in size. I'm initializing global > > static arrays with a constant initializer. But D requires that (per > > default) static arrays are initialized with the default initializer > > for the element type. For float this happens to be NaN, so I cannot > > use a 'zeroinitializer'. > > Wow, this *is* bad. I think

Chris Lattner wrote: >> D allows static arrays up to 16MB in size. I'm initializing global >> static arrays with a constant initializer. But D requires that (per >> default) static arrays are initialized with the default initializer >> for the element type. For float this happens to be NaN, so I cannot >> use a 'zeroinitializer'. > > Wow, this *is*

di.cpp: ------ #include <iostream> using namespace std; struct foo { int a; int b; }; int main(int, char **) { const foo f = { .a = 10, .b = 11 }; cout << f.a << ' ' << f.b << endl; return 0; } ----- $ clang++ -Wall -Wextra -Weffc++ -o di di.cpp $ ./di 10 11 It is a standard C99! Or am I wrong? $ clang++ --version clang version 2.8

On Jan 13, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Andrey Valyaev wrote: > di.cpp: > ------ > #include <iostream> > using namespace std; > > struct foo { > int a; > int b; > }; > > int main(int, char **) > { > const foo f = { .a = 10, .b = 11 }; > cout << f.a << ' ' << f.b << endl; > return 0; > } > ----- > > $

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 05:04:42PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > Prepare to mark sensitive kernel structures for randomization by making > sure they're using designated initializers. These were identified during > allyesconfig builds of x86, arm, and arm64, with most initializer fixes > extracted from grsecurity. > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>