similar to: [LLVMdev] single tests in test-suite

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] single tests in test-suite"

2013 Jul 25
0
[LLVMdev] [LNT][Patch] Bug 16261 - lnt incorrectly builds timeit-target when one is using a simulator
Okay to push this change? On 07/23/2013 05:17 PM, reed kotler wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > In this case we are not using lnt under Qemu user mode for benchmarking; > just as a way to run test-suite to test whether the code is correct. > > Qemu user mode emulates target instructions, but when it gets a Unix > Kernel trap, it uses the host to emulate those. > > For example,
2013 May 15
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm] r181753 - This is the first of three patches which creates stubs used for
Hi Jim, There is no "target independent" code in these patches. It's all Mips specific. There is something I'm proposing for AP/NO_APP wrappers but that will just make the stubs look nicer (without the clutter of those wrappers). That is purely a cosmetic issue of the .s files being produced. The discussion has moved back to the main thread so I'll continue there.
2013 Aug 03
1
[LLVMdev] test-suite strange output
On 8/2/13 6:03 PM, reed kotler wrote: > Turns out that in my latest upgrade to Ubuntu 12.x, it reassigned > > /bin/sh -> /bin/dash and LLVM needs /bin/sh to be /bin/bash I would think that using bash specific features in a /bin/sh shell script is a bug. I remembering ferreting these sorts of problems out in the early days. Does LLVM now consider it okay to assume that /bin/sh is
2012 Dec 13
1
[LLVMdev] failures in test-suite for make TEST=simple
I use the 'make TEST=simple' as a pre-commit test. I think that everybody should run these tests before committing to LLVM. On Dec 12, 2012, at 5:06 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > when I create the report, there are no failures in it. so maybe these are being filtered for known failures. > > On 12/12/2012 05:03 PM, reed kotler wrote: >> The first
2013 Feb 04
1
[LLVMdev] single tests in test-suite
How do you build and run just a single test in test-suite? tia Reed
2012 Dec 12
2
[LLVMdev] test-suite
On 12/12/2012 10:18 AM, Nadav Rotem wrote: > I run the test suite by CD-ing into /projects/test-suite and running "make TEST=simple -j 4". > > > On Dec 12, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > >> I'm trying to run test-suite for x86 in order to verify a target independent patch before I put it back. >> The patch has been
2012 Dec 16
1
[LLVMdev] test-suite
On 12/15/2012 12:53 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com > <mailto:rkotler at mips.com>> wrote: > > I have an approved target independent putback and i've run all > that we have at Mips as well as on x86 " make TEST=simple" > > Is there anything else that is easy to run that I
2012 Dec 13
0
[LLVMdev] failures in test-suite for make TEST=simple
when I create the report, there are no failures in it. so maybe these are being filtered for known failures. On 12/12/2012 05:03 PM, reed kotler wrote: > The first one failed on a diff: > ******************** TEST (simple) 'sse.expandfft' FAILED! > ******************** > Execution Context Diff: > /home/rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/tools/fpcmp: Compared: >
2011 Nov 07
0
[LLVMdev] test-suite failures
Reed, On Nov 7, 2011, at 2:11 PM, reed kotler wrote: > We have a modified version of projects/test-suite that we can run cross > using Qemu. > > We would like to put that back so that other people can test MIPS > before putting back. > Well, this would be easily modifiable for ARM and other targets that are > supported by QEMU. > > But in this case, we would need
2012 Dec 12
0
[LLVMdev] test-suite
I run the test suite by CD-ing into /projects/test-suite and running "make TEST=simple -j 4". On Dec 12, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > I'm trying to run test-suite for x86 in order to verify a target independent patch before I put it back. > The patch has been approved. > > What is the best way to run it in order to get maximum
2013 Jan 12
0
[LLVMdev] running a single test of "make check"
`llvm-lit path/to/test/file/here` Joey On 12 January 2013 12:08, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > Is there a way to just run one test with "make check" for either the llvm > or clang test suites? > > Tia. > > Reed > ______________________________**_________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu
2012 Dec 16
1
[LLVMdev] test-suite
On 12/15/2012 12:53 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com > <mailto:rkotler at mips.com>> wrote: > > I have an approved target independent putback and i've run all > that we have at Mips as well as on x86 " make TEST=simple" > > Is there anything else that is easy to run that I
2013 Aug 02
0
[LLVMdev] test-suite strange output
Turns out that in my latest upgrade to Ubuntu 12.x, it reassigned /bin/sh -> /bin/dash and LLVM needs /bin/sh to be /bin/bash On 08/02/2013 03:45 PM, reed kotler wrote: > Has anyone ever seen this message in the test-suite output: > > /bin/sh: 7: test: 0: unexpected operator > > I'm getting a lot of them but otherwise it seems to be working just fine.
2011 Nov 08
1
[LLVMdev] test-suite failures
On 11/07/2011 02:29 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:11 PM, reed kotler<rkotler at mips.com> wrote: >> We have a modified version of projects/test-suite that we can run cross >> using Qemu. >> >> We would like to put that back so that other people can test MIPS >> before putting back. >> Well, this would be easily modifiable for ARM
2012 Dec 15
0
[LLVMdev] test-suite
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > I have an approved target independent putback and i've run all that we > have at Mips as well as on x86 " make TEST=simple" > > Is there anything else that is easy to run that I can do before doing the > commit? > > The patch touches a number of basic classes so I'm just
2015 Mar 19
2
[LLVMdev] Final added to parser<bool>
On 03/19/2015 09:57 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Reed Kotler <reed.kotler at imgtec.com > <mailto:reed.kotler at imgtec.com>> wrote: > > On 03/19/2015 09:38 AM, David Blaikie wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Reed Kotler >> <reed.kotler at imgtec.com <mailto:reed.kotler at
2015 Mar 19
2
[LLVMdev] Final added to parser<bool>
On 03/19/2015 09:38 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Reed Kotler <reed.kotler at imgtec.com > <mailto:reed.kotler at imgtec.com>> wrote: > > On 03/19/2015 09:24 AM, David Blaikie wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Reed Kotler >> <reed.kotler at imgtec.com <mailto:reed.kotler at
2014 Mar 10
2
[LLVMdev] release procedure questions
On 03/10/2014 03:37 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > cc'ing Bill as Release Manager > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:53 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: >> I'm trying to understand how Mips will fit into the official release >> procedure. >> >> There are two Mips compilers: >> 1) The X86 resident llvm/clang compiler that can generate
2015 Mar 19
2
[LLVMdev] Final added to parser<bool>
On 03/19/2015 09:24 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Reed Kotler <reed.kotler at imgtec.com > <mailto:reed.kotler at imgtec.com>> wrote: > > Well, you are an mclinker contributor > > > Me personally? Not that I know of. Sorry. I thought i had seen your name in an mclinker commit. > > and Google uses mclinker >
2011 Nov 07
0
[LLVMdev] test-suite failures
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:11 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > We have a modified version of projects/test-suite that we can run cross > using Qemu. > > We would like to put that back so that other people can test MIPS > before putting back. > Well, this would be easily modifiable for ARM and other targets that are > supported by QEMU. > > But in this