similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm.org back up

Any issues with permanently accepting the intermediate certificate, which I did this morning, when getting the message? Thanks in advance Garrison On Jun 29, 2011, at 12:13, John Criswell wrote: > On 6/28/11 3:56 PM, John Criswell wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> The good news is that the new llvm.org SSL certificate is installed and >> appears to be configured

On 6/28/11 3:56 PM, John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > The good news is that the new llvm.org SSL certificate is installed and > appears to be configured correctly. As a followup to this, I discovered that I was using the MacPorts version of the svn client on our Mac OS X system. Using the svn client in /usr/bin/svn seems to recognize the certificate just fine. The pattern that

Dear All, The good news is that the new llvm.org SSL certificate is installed and appears to be configured correctly. The bad news is that some machines seem to recognize the intermediate SSL certificate (which is apparently used to sign the SSL certificates UIUC buys starting this year) while others do not. In particular, our internal Linux machines show no errors, while our Macs and

FYI, the mailing lists are handled by separate UIUC servers and are not hosted by the llvm server. All web, svn, etc are on the llvm server. John - Can you find out why the mailing list archives have incorrect time stamps? -Tanya On Apr 8, 2008, at 2:59 PM, heisenbug wrote: > Looks like some clocks are wrong, as shown by the timestamp > on

Tanya Lattner wrote: > FYI, the mailing lists are handled by separate UIUC servers and are > not hosted by the llvm server. All web, svn, etc are on the llvm server. > > John - Can you find out why the mailing list archives have incorrect > time stamps? > I'm pretty sure it was my laptop. The time was correct: 11:28. The problem was that I sent it at 11:28 am and not

John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > Some of you may have noticed that our SSL certificate expired about half > an hour ago. We have a new SSL certificate, but we haven't had time to > install it. > > I am going to attempt to install the new certificate. This will > necessitate one server restart if I am successful and probably two if > I'm not. > >

Looks like some clocks are wrong, as shown by the timestamp on <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2008-April/ 013731.html>. Cheers, Gabor On Apr 9, 6:28 am, John Criswell <crisw... at uiuc.edu> wrote: > Dear All, > > The LLVM server is back online.  If you find something that isn't > working, please let me know. > > Thanks for your patience. >

March or April? ;) -Tanya On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > The LLVM network services (llvm.org web site, SVN server, etc.) will be > offline starting at 10:30 am Central Time on Tuesday, March 8. We are > moving the machine hosting these services to the server room where it > will be a dedicated server machine from Tuesday henceforth. > > I

All, The server that runs the mailing lists will be down for maintenance starting Friday Dec 18th at 10:30PM PST. I do not expect a long downtime, but please keep this in mind if you see any issues with the lists during this period. I will send an email once I am finished. No other services should be affected. Thanks, Tanya

On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, John Criswell wrote: > Tanya Lattner wrote: >> Everything builds fine on sparc. The configure script needs to be fixed >> though (see previous email). > > I'm not getting the error with the configure script (on Kain, anyway). I've > tried it with --with-f2c and with f96 (NAG Fortran compiler) in and out of my > $PATH. > > Can you

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, John Criswell wrote: > >> Tanya Lattner wrote: >> >>> Everything builds fine on sparc. The configure script needs to be >>> fixed though (see previous email). >> >> >> I'm not getting the error with the configure script (on Kain, anyway). >> I've tried it with --with-f2c and with f96

> On Jun 22, 2017, at 12:00 PM, Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote: > > On 06/21/2017 03:22 PM, Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: >> LLVMers, >> >> >> >> TheLLVM.org <http://LLVM.org>server which hosts SVN, GIT mirror, documentation, and the mainLLVM.org <http://LLVM.org>website is moving to a new server on June 24th. As a

Tanya Lattner wrote: > > Everything builds fine on sparc. The configure script needs to be fixed > though (see previous email). I'm not getting the error with the configure script (on Kain, anyway). I've tried it with --with-f2c and with f96 (NAG Fortran compiler) in and out of my $PATH. Can you verify that the configure script works for you without the --with-f2c option?

The demo script isn't part of the release and its not failing. Do you want me to revert the changes? Reid. On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:08 -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > > It's already messed with, but there's no harm. If someone turns on the > > llvm2cpp option, then they get an error message at the bottom of the > > output page. All other output is normal. So,

On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: >> The demo script isn't part of the release and its not failing. >> Do you want me to revert the changes? > No. I just said that we should avoid anymore changes for the next 2 weeks to > maintain stability. FWIW, I agree with Tanya on this. People *pound* on the demo page immediately after a release as they try it out and

It's already messed with, but there's no harm. If someone turns on the llvm2cpp option, then they get an error message at the bottom of the output page. All other output is normal. So, there's no harm in it. If/when llvm2cpp becomes available on Zion, people then the llvm2cpp output will appear. Note that llvm2cpp is a 1.8 release feature. My change was to help people learning LLVM

> The demo script isn't part of the release and its not failing. > > Do you want me to revert the changes? No. I just said that we should avoid anymore changes for the next 2 weeks to maintain stability. -Tanya > > Reid. > > On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:08 -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: >>> It's already messed with, but there's no harm. If someone turns on

Dear All, I have finished updating the DSA and Poolalloc source code so that it compiles with the LLVM 2.6 API. If you check out the LLVM 2.6 branch (directions are in the llvmdev archives; look for the email by Tanya Lattner about the LLVM 2.6 branch), you should be able to build mainline DSA and Pool Allocation against it. If you have trouble building DSA/Pool Allocation, please email

> It's already messed with, but there's no harm. If someone turns on the > llvm2cpp option, then they get an error message at the bottom of the > output page. All other output is normal. So, there's no harm in it. > If/when llvm2cpp becomes available on Zion, people then the llvm2cpp > output will appear. Note that llvm2cpp is a 1.8 release feature. My > change was

Okay, let me reiterate. The llvm2cpp option is *already* on the demo script page. If you choose that option, you just get an error message because llvm2cpp can't be found. Its harmless and everything else still works. I won't change the script for a couple of weeks, per Tanya's and your request. Reid. On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:48 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 10 Aug