similar to: [LLVMdev] single tests in test-suite

is test-suite being run still by itself (independent of llvm)? if so, are there public build bots for this? is lnt going to replace test-suite as the normal mechanism for running test-suite? Tia. Reed

On 4 June 2013 22:08, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > is test-suite being run still by itself (independent of llvm)? > AFAIK, yes. http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html if so, are there public build bots for this? > We have one: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt Setting it up was just copy&paste on Zorg's config (and fixing the bugs

On 03/10/2014 03:37 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > cc'ing Bill as Release Manager > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:53 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: >> I'm trying to understand how Mips will fit into the official release >> procedure. >> >> There are two Mips compilers: >> 1) The X86 resident llvm/clang compiler that can generate

I'm trying to run test-suite for x86 in order to verify a target independent patch before I put it back. The patch has been approved. What is the best way to run it in order to get maximum coverage and have results where I can tell that I have not regressed anything (as well as the test-suite can help with that)? I've already tested it against the Mips compiler but we have a slightly

I run the test suite by CD-ing into /projects/test-suite and running "make TEST=simple -j 4". On Dec 12, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > I'm trying to run test-suite for x86 in order to verify a target independent patch before I put it back. > The patch has been approved. > > What is the best way to run it in order to get maximum

Is there a way to just run one test with "make check" for either the llvm or clang test suites? Tia. Reed

If you can't make an executable test from C or C++ code then how do you know something works. Just by examination of the .s? On 09/30/2014 03:18 PM, Reed Kotler wrote: > If I wanted to call this function that they generated by hand, from C or > C+ code, how would that be done? > > if have seen cases where a real boolean gets generated but it was > something fairly involved.

`llvm-lit path/to/test/file/here` Joey On 12 January 2013 12:08, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > Is there a way to just run one test with "make check" for either the llvm > or clang test suites? > > Tia. > > Reed > ______________________________**_________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu

Technically I don't need C/C++ code for it. I'm not really very good at writing LLVM assembly code by hand (but I should be - lol ). I'm working on fast-isel and I want to have executable tests for all of this and not just make check tests. It's easier for me to do that in C/C++ and then save the .ll and morph it into a make check test. I'm going through the fast-isel

On 06/10/2014 05:51 PM, Pete Cooper wrote: > Hi Reed > > You can do this on the instruction itself by telling it 2 operands > must be the same register. For example, from X86: > > let Constraints = "$src1 = $dst" in > defm INSERTPS : SS41I_insertf32<0x21, "insertps">; > > Thanks, Hi Pete, Sorry. I should have been more specific. I'm

I'm trying to understand how Mips will fit into the official release procedure. There are two Mips compilers: 1) The X86 resident llvm/clang compiler that can generate code for various Mips targets. 2) The Mips resident compiler (on linux or bsd or other) which would generate code primarily for that same host. How does this fit into the release structure? We would like to make

The issues seems to be this line in the tools Makefile timeit-target: timeit.c $(LD_ENV_OVERRIDES) $(LCC) -o $@ $< $(LDFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) $(TARGET_FLAGS) -O3 It should not add target flags if we are simulating the target on the host. On 06/06/2013 06:59 PM, reed kotler wrote: > I want to get lnt to use qemu for the execution. > > In that case, RHOST= is not set. > > But I

On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:01 PM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > On 02/17/2013 12:48 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: >> On Feb 16, 2013, at 1:31 PM, Cameron Zwarich <zwarich at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> That's exactly the right place. >> Really? You don't want the expansion to be optimized? You want to specify a machine model for the pseudo's

I used the A9 schedule as an example: http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/ARM/ARMScheduleA9.td The documentation could use more clarity, but this is how I was able to do it to always get two specific instructions to be scheduled together. ________________________________________ From: reed kotler [rkotler at mips.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 8:54 PM To: Micah Villmow

On 12/15/2012 12:53 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com > <mailto:rkotler at mips.com>> wrote: > > I have an approved target independent putback and i've run all > that we have at Mips as well as on x86 " make TEST=simple" > > Is there anything else that is easy to run that I

I use the 'make TEST=simple' as a pre-commit test. I think that everybody should run these tests before committing to LLVM. On Dec 12, 2012, at 5:06 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > when I create the report, there are no failures in it. so maybe these are being filtered for known failures. > > On 12/12/2012 05:03 PM, reed kotler wrote: >> The first

Thanks. So what about a fragment like this: (taken from fast-isel.ll in X86 ) define void @ptrtoint_i1(i8* %p, i1* %q) nounwind { %t = ptrtoint i8* %p to i1 store i1 %t, i1* %q ret void } TIA. On 09/29/2014 02:16 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith wrote: >> On Sep 29, 2014, at 1:51 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: >> >> What kind of C or C++ code will emit

On 12/12/2012 10:18 AM, Nadav Rotem wrote: > I run the test suite by CD-ing into /projects/test-suite and running "make TEST=simple -j 4". > > > On Dec 12, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > >> I'm trying to run test-suite for x86 in order to verify a target independent patch before I put it back. >> The patch has been

On 05/27/2013 10:48 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: > I don't quite understand your question. Clang already supports -Os option. > > Evan Okay. Do I need to add anything to the llc command line? > Sent from my iPad > > On May 27, 2013, at 7:47 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > >> I'm trying to set the default optimizations for mips16. >>

Reed, Couldn't you also use instruction scheduling classes and specify that the second instruction has a bypass from the first instruction? The scheduler should always schedule them together in that case. Micah > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On > Behalf Of reed kotler > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013