similar to: [LLVMdev] creating a variable structure, getting offset pointer

I'm encountering a few problems in my migration that I haven't yet figured out. `getOrInsertFunction` is generating a SEGFAULT at FunctionType::isValidArgumentType(llvm::Type*).  I'm calling it as:     generic_ptr_ = llvm::PointerType::get( llvm::Type::getInt8Ty(context), 0 );     f_natural_int = llvm::IntegerType::get(context, 64);     module->getOrInsertFunction(        

Hi Sarath, It would have really helped if you had removed the commented out code and inlined the calls to your homemade helper functions before sending it... You are doing this, in LLVM IR: %0 = getelementptr %Value* %firstArg, i32 0 ; i8** %1 = load i8** %0 ; i8* %2 = bitcast i8* %1 to i64* %3 = getelementptr %Value* %secondArg, i32 0 ; i8** %4 = load i8** %3; i8* %5 = bitcast i8* %4 to i64*

Yeah, that's the fault...got the answer...... Thanks James for the help... Struggling with this for so many days....... On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 4:02 PM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com> wrote: > Hi Sarath,**** > > ** ** > > It would have really helped if you had removed the commented out code and > inlined the calls to your homemade helper functions before

Hi, I test your code and it works!!! but I didn't understand if "create a function" it necessary for my aims. What I tried to do is declare a structured to allow after declaration global or local structured variables. How I can I do? Thanks, Manuele Il 31/01/2013 10:14, Garba,Peter ha scritto: > Hi, > > that's what I'm doing ... > > //Init the struct type

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:46 PM, sarath chandra <sarathcse19 at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi James, > > First i converted the void * to int* and then did FPToSI...then did SHL...( > because CreateShl only accepts integers... i pointer casted it to int64 type > first)... Below is the code snippet.... > > > lhs = mBuilder.CreateStructGEP(firstArg, 0); > lhs =

Hi all, Please review this patch. It's fixing PR3232 comment #8. Function bar from 2008-03-24-BitFiled-And-Alloca.c compiles to: %struct.Key = type { { i32, i32 } } ... define i32 @bar(i64 %key_token2) nounwind { entry: %key_token2_addr = alloca i64 ; <i64*> [#uses=2] %retval = alloca i32 ; <i32*> [#uses=2] %iospec =

Renato Golin <renato.golin at arm.com> writes: > Example: > > // CHECK: %struct.I = type { i32, i8 } > struct I { > int a; > char b; > }; > > // CHECK: %struct.J = type { [8 x i8], i8, [3 x i8] } > struct J : I { > char c; > }; > > What happens here is that "c" is placed in the base's tail padding and > there are three bytes

Thanks, I've been through the documentation, and if I visit main, i think everything will turn out correctly... Printing out the Call graph reveals that main is calling this external node i think you are making reference to. Could this be the problem? Dave On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Chris Lattner wrote: > > if you take the time to print out the function each non-looping node iter >

> if you take the time to print out the function each non-looping node iter > traverses, it never reaches main... Ok, first note that the CallGraph class does really stupid (but correct) things for function pointers, so you're not going to see anything remarkably nice here... Make sure to read the CallGraph.h comments to understand exactly what is going on. Despite that, I can verify

Test Cases: (attached) Iteration code: (...) typedef TarjanSCC_iterator<CallGraph*> MyTarjan; CallGraph& callGraph = getAnalysis<CallGraph>(); MyTarjan iter = tarj_begin(&callGraph); MyTarjan end = tarj_end(&callGraph); while(iter!=end) iter++; (...) if you take the time to print out the function each non-looping node iter traverses, it never reaches main...

Hi, I do have < INT_MAX. This looks attractive but since they are unique identifiers, storing them as factor will be likely to be counter-productive. (a string version + an int32 for each) I was looking to https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/csvread/index.html This looks like a good feet for my needs. Any chances such an external package for int64 would be integrated in core ? Le 20

Hello, I'm wondering why only some global static variables are marked with __used__ attributes in llvm-gcc/gcc/crtstuff.c. GCC compiles crtstuff.c with -fno-toplevel-reorder option, which ensures that unused static globals are not removed during optimization. However, since LLVM does not support that option, I presume __used__ attribute is used instead. For example, __CTOR_LIST__[1]

Albert Graef wrote: > Jeff Kuskin wrote: >> Correct? If not, how do I call a LLVM JIT-generated fastcc function >> from a function statically compiled by GCC? > > Well, you can always generate a little wrapper function with C calling > convention which just calls the fastcc function. > I use the fastcall convention all the time. LLVM-jitted code calling GCC-compile

On Sep 22, 2009, at 6:11 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Victor, this code from the verifier broke the Ada front-end build: > > const Module* M = CI.getParent()->getParent()->getParent(); > Constant *MallocFunc = M->getFunction("malloc"); > > if (CI.getOperand(0) == MallocFunc) { > const PointerType *PTy = > >

I'm migrating from 3.3 to 3.8 and am having a few problems. `CreateStructGEP` requires a type parameter now. I'm not sure what type it's expecting, so I converted `CreateStructGEP( valuePtr, index )` to `CreateStructGEP( valuePtr->getType(), valuePtr, index )`... would that be correct? `arg_iterator` no longer converst to Value*, I have a lot of this now: &*(args++) This

On Jun 6, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 6 June 2011 17:08, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: >> if(T == Type::getInt1PtrTy(Context, AS)) ... > > You don't need to care about address spaces to check for an int32*: > > if (T->isPointerTy()) { > const Type* intT = cast<PointerType>(T)->getElementType(); > if

Does getelementptr have a counterpart function which unindexes a pointer? In particular, I'm using CreateStructGEP from the builder and want to get back to the struct pointer from a member pointer. fptr = b.CreateStructGEP( sptr, 2 ); //I want to do this sptr = b.CreateUnStructGEP( fptr, sptr_type, 2 ); I know I can calculate the offsets on my own, but it'd be nice to not have to since

Shall I just use BitCast for function type conversion as well? For example, in C notation, can I safely cast a pointer to the first function to the second and back again: void foo( T * ) to/from void generic( int8 * ) -- edA-qa mort-ora-y -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Sign: Please digitally sign your emails. Encrypt: I'm also happy to receive

The lack of 64 bit integer support causes lots of problems when dealing with certain types of data where the loss of precision from coercing to 53 bits with double is unacceptable. Two packages were developed to deal with this: int64 and bit64. You may need to find archival versions of these packages if they've fallen off cran. Murray (mobile phone) On Jan 20, 2017 7:20 AM, "Gabriel

2^53 == 2^53+1 TRUE Which makes joining or grouping data sets with 64 bit identifiers problematic. Murray (mobile) On Jan 20, 2017 9:15 AM, "Nicolas Paris" <nicolas.paris at aphp.fr> wrote: Le 20 janv. 2017 ? 18h09, Murray Stokely ?crivait : > The lack of 64 bit integer support causes lots of problems when dealing with > certain types of data where the loss of precision