similar to: [LLVMdev] Structure declaration with IR builder

Hi All, I tryed to create a global structured derived declaration in my compiler by: StructType *st = StructType(getGlobalContext(), elements, false); In dump module i didn't find any code needed to declare a new user data type. Is there a instruction to add this class into current module? Cheers, Manuele

Hi, when upgrading my compiler from LLVM 2.1 to 2.4 I stumbled upon a change of behaviour in ParseAssemblyString. For an interactive toplevel I am generating .ll source and feeding it into ParseAssemblyString like this: Module* parsedModule = ParseAssemblyString( code, targetModule, &errorInfo ); where targetModule is the module I expect all the LLVM code to go. Until 2.1 the

Thanks a lot for your help. Indeed if I compile with -OZ the loop gets replaced with something like this: if ( *v3 < 0 ) v4 = 0; Is there a reason why it does not get applied with O3 ? I mean this a huge improvement to the loop. -----Original Message----- From: Doerfert, Johannes [mailto:jdoerfert at anl.gov] Sent: Dienstag, 13. August 2019 19:13 To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; Garba

Hi, during a reverse engineering challenge I used clang/llvm optimizations to minimiz some code and I found some strange behavior that I can't reproduce with GCC or CL (visual studio compiler). The C code function contains some code that operates on a data array and an supplied password from ARGV. The compiled binary works as long as I don't activate any optimizations. When I activate

Hello, I am experiencing problems, when trying to assemble these two x86-64 Opcodes "add r64, imm32" "imul r64, r64, imm32" When having the most significant bit set for imm32, for example: "add rax, 0x80000000", "add rax, 0xffffffff", ... "imul rbx, rsi, 0x80000000", "imul rbx, rsi, 0xffffffff", ... The Error Message I receive is the

On Dec 23, 2008, at 7:15 AM, Jan Rehders wrote: > Hi, > > when upgrading my compiler from LLVM 2.1 to 2.4 I stumbled upon a > change of behaviour in ParseAssemblyString. For an interactive > toplevel I am generating .ll source and feeding it into > ParseAssemblyString like this: Hi Jan, I don't think that there is any intentional change here. It sounds like a bug.

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Manuele Conti <manuele.conti at sirius-es.it>wrote: > Hi Justin, > my class is a visitor pattern and I use accept method to go recursive in > suboject in my AST. > In locals I store AllocaInst pointer. > > > void *visit(var1_init_decl_c *symbol) { > llvm::Type *lType; > > varNames.clear(); > varType = "";

I have seen that the hist() function plots an histogram of the frequency but I cannot find the value of the object hist that contains theese values... how is possible to get out them? thank you very mutch best regards Manuele -- Manuele Pesenti manuele a inventati.org amicogodzilla a jabber.linux.it http://mpesenti.polito.it

Hi, I was wondering if there is an optimization pass in LLVM or Polly that can optimize this given loop: int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { char s = 0; // Loop is setting s = argv[1][0]; for (int i=0; i<argv[1][0]; i++) { s++; } printf("s = %c\n", s); return 0; }

Dear R users, just another little question... are there other ways, I mean more easy to write, to obtain the same result I got with: data[95:length(dati[,1]), ] where data is a data frame to extract the last elements starting from a fixed position? thank you very much best regards Manuele PEsenti -- Manuele Pesenti manuele a inventati.org amicogodzilla a jabber.linux.it

Hi Justin, my class is a visitor pattern and I use accept method to go recursive in suboject in my AST. In locals I store AllocaInst pointer. void *visit(var1_init_decl_c *symbol) { llvm::Type *lType; varNames.clear(); varType = ""; symbol->var1_list->accept(*this); /* get a vector contains variable names */ symbol->spec_init->accept(*this); /* Store in

Dear R User, I'm a new member of this list, I'm using R language from a short time and I would like to ask you something I cannot solve... I'm using the fwdlm function from the forward library, I'm specially interested by the results of Cook's distances: I'd want to know which inputs are the cause of peacks in Cook's distances plot; because what I find in abscisas

Dear R user, how can I update a data.frame adding new lines? I need to create a second data frame from a first one with only some of their entrys filtering the value of a specific column... How can I do this? thankyou very much in advance best regards Manuele PEsenti -- Manuele Pesenti manuele a inventati.org amicogodzilla a jabber.linux.it http://mpesenti.polito.it

Dear User, what's the correct way to obtain a multiple return from a function? for example creating the simple function: somma <- function (a, b) { c <- a+b return (a, b, c) } when I call it, it runs but returns the following output: > somma(5, 7) $a [1] 5 $b [1] 7 $c [1] 12 Warning message: return multi-argomento sono deprecati in: return(a, b, c) i.e. multi-return is

Hi Rick, you are right! But can you call this method EngineBuilder::setErrorStr to get creation error? Cheers, Manuele Il 08/01/2013 20:27, Rick Mann ha scritto: > On Jan 8, 2013, at 8:09 , Manuele Conti <manuele.conti at sirius-es.it> wrote: > >> Sorry I forgot to add code that I use to run code: >> /* Executes the AST by running the main function */ >>

you're not showing enough code. What does accept() do? Based on your description, I strongly suspect that your alloca and constant are not the same type. Remember that alloca returns a pointer type that you must load to get at the actual variable. On Jan 11, 2013 3:28 AM, "Manuele Conti" <manuele.conti at sirius-es.it> wrote: > Hi All, > I'm writing a code

Dear R users, how can I extrapolate values listed in the summary of an lm model but not directly available between object values such as the the standard errors of the calculated parameters? for example I got a model: mod <- lm(Crd ~ 1 + Week, data=data) and its summary: > summary(mod) Call: lm(formula = Crd ~ 1 + Week, data = data, model = TRUE, y = TRUE) Residuals: Min

Sorry I forgot to add code that I use to run code: /* Executes the AST by running the main function */ GenericValue CodeGenContext::runCode() { std::cout << "Running code...\n"; ExecutionEngine *ee = EngineBuilder(module).create(); vector<GenericValue> noargs; GenericValue v = ee->runFunction(mainFunction, noargs); std::cout << "Code was run.\n"; return v;

On Jan 8, 2013, at 8:09 , Manuele Conti <manuele.conti at sirius-es.it> wrote: > Sorry I forgot to add code that I use to run code: > /* Executes the AST by running the main function */ > GenericValue CodeGenContext::runCode() { > std::cout << "Running code...\n"; > ExecutionEngine *ee = EngineBuilder(module).create(); > < > div

Hi All, I'm writing a code generation with my compiler. I read sever example and documentation but I did understand what I make wrong. What I try to do is a compare a local variable with a constant. But when I create a ICMP instruction I get that instruction are not of same type. I'm using llvm by svn repository updated at two week ago. The code that I try to generation is something