similar to: [LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release

Mark, > Pawel, > You don't know me but I'm one of the release engineers for > BIND 9 and BIND 8 before that. I have been doing release engineering > for about 1.5 decades now. One of the things you DO NOT do is > replace a tarball. Machines get compromised. Good distributions > get replaced with tainted versions. One of the few ways the rest > of the world has

I and some other people have problems with running the freedos image included in Ultimate Boot CD (UBCD), when using memdisk for floppy emulation. Memdisk starts booting the image and freedos shows the following menu: 0 Boot Clean 1 Boot UMBPCI (silent) 2 Boot UMBPCI (optimal) 3 Boot UMBPCI (semi-defensive) 4 Boot EMM386 (optimal) 5 Boot EMM386 (semi-defensive) 6 Boot no UMB (defensive) 7 Boot

Removed from trunk. Pawel can decide if its necessary to update the tarballs. Thanks for the report! Apparently git-svn does not delete removed directories. On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:36 AM, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) < chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > Hi Pawel, > > PTX already be replaced with NVPTX. However, PTX subdirectory > still sit in lib/Target in 3.2 release. Do you

On 11.01.2013, at 07:36, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > Hi Pawel, > > PTX already be replaced with NVPTX. However, PTX subdirectory > still sit in lib/Target in 3.2 release. Do you think update the > release tarball is a good idea? Also could you remove it from > the trunk? Please do not, under no circumstances, change the 3.2 release tarballs

Hi Anton, You can download the old tarball from here: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj/tmp/llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz I don't have the pgp sig, maybe you need to generate it yourself. Please let me know when you done. Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.) Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667 Homepage:

> If you are in a hurry check with Tanya or Bill. Tanya explicitly asked you to revert everything. I'm going to do this for you asap. Stay tuned -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

Hi Pawel, Sorry for the trouble. At first I think maybe we can upload a new release tarball not replacing it, sorry I didn't say it in the previous mail. IMHO, if you have to do something new after the post-release, make a "dot" release would be better. Perhaps you can write down this experience to benifit other LLVMRM in the future. :-) Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)

On 1/11/2013 7:15 AM, Justin Holewinski wrote: > Removed from trunk. Pawel can decide if its necessary to update the > tarballs. > > Thanks for the report! Apparently git-svn does not delete removed > directories. PTX directories still exists in release_32 branch and RELEASE_32/final. But they are all empty so PTX can not be build. > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:36

Tanya, > Pawel, > > First, all your help with the 3.2 release is greatly appreciated. I do not think anyone is saying otherwise. Nothing was said so nothing to worry about. > > I apologize for the lack of documentation regarding this issue. I do ask that you consult with previous release manager (myself or Bill) to determine what the best course of action is. There is a lot of

On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 11.01.2013, at 07:36, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > > > Hi Pawel, > > > > PTX already be replaced with NVPTX. However, PTX subdirectory > >

Hi Pawel, PTX already be replaced with NVPTX. However, PTX subdirectory still sit in lib/Target in 3.2 release. Do you think update the release tarball is a good idea? Also could you remove it from the trunk? Thanks. Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.) Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667 Homepage:

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com>wrote: > > On 11.01.2013, at 07:36, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> > wrote: > > > Hi Pawel, > > > > PTX already be replaced with NVPTX. However, PTX subdirectory > > still sit in lib/Target in 3.2 release. Do you think update the > > release tarball is

On 1/11/2013 3:59 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:47:01PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: >> On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski >>>> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote:

Hello, I'm trying to set up a b410p rdsi card, and I'm having problems getting it up. I followed the instruction on asteriskguru and everything seem to be fine but all leds on the card are in red. [root@rdsipbx ~]# uname -a Linux rdsipbx 2.6.15.7 #2 Tue Jun 5 16:37:07 CEST 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [root@rdsipbx ~]# dmesg |grep Digium HFC-multi: card manufacturer: 'Cologne Chip

On 1/11/2013 2:51 PM, Justin Holewinski wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > >> On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski >>>> <justin.holewinski at

On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: >> >> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski >> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kramer >>> <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 11.01.2013, at

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: > >> > >> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski > >> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26

Pawel, First, all your help with the 3.2 release is greatly appreciated. I do not think anyone is saying otherwise. I apologize for the lack of documentation regarding this issue. I do ask that you consult with previous release manager (myself or Bill) to determine what the best course of action is. There is a lot of room to improve our release process, but its a collaborative effort. You are

Anton, > Pawel, > > We all understand that you're pretty new to release process, etc., but > I think you should understand the implications of your actions. > > You just created a lot of harm for really huge pile of users - the > ones who downloads the tarball via some automated build system and > rely on the known good checksum. This includes, but not limited to to

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: > > On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 11.01.2013, at 07:36, ????????? (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > > >