similar to: [LLVMdev] Error for 'make'

Hello, I want to write my own plug-in. So when i tried to execute the PrintFumctionNames plug-in in llvm/tools/clang/examples/PrintFumctionNames i'm getting an error at first step of 'make' only. The error is : akash at ubuntu:~/llvm/tools/clang/examples/PrintFunctionNames$ make ../../../../Makefile.common:60: ../../../../Makefile.config: No such file or directory

If you could point me towards the correct location in the standard I would appreciate that - I didn't realize it wasn't acceptable to turn pointer-data to structs. My example is reduced from the EEMBC benchmarks where I ran into the problem, so I may have reduced it too far by accident (but I'm fairly sure they do not use __attribute__ or similar). Adding a

Hello, Thank you for your answer. If I want to use then I have error: ‘NodeTy* llvm::ilist_half_node<NodeTy>::getPrev() [with NodeTy = llvm::Instruction]’ is protected error: ‘llvm::ilist_half_node<llvm::Instruction>’ is not an accessible base of ‘llvm::Instruction’ Do you know any other method to access the previous instruction of a terminator instruction? PS: back() is not an

getPrevNode<http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/classllvm_1_1ilist__node.html#a77b897207ef0a1ae95c404695aed9a4b>() Get the previous node, or 0 for the list head. I don't see any method like hasPrevNode. It can be a weird problem because "current->getPrevNode()" is indicating to "current" itself (the problem appears for the BB with only one element)? On Thu, Dec

On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Stephen McGruer <stephen.mcgruer at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm having trouble getting my backend to properly treat the situation where > a char* is converted into a struct, i.e. something like: > > char* pointer_representation = ...; > MyStruct* my_struct = (MyStruct*) pointer_representation; > my_struct->an_int_field = 5; > >

I solved by checking if(BB->size()>1) Thank you all for the help ! Now debugging the next segfault. On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Alexandru Ionut Diaconescu < alexandruionutdiaconescu at gmail.com> wrote: > getPrevNode<http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/classllvm_1_1ilist__node.html#a77b897207ef0a1ae95c404695aed9a4b>() > Get the previous node, or 0 for the list

Thanks for the suggestion. I ran verify-machineinstrs and found that I've definitely been doing something wrong, for quite a while at least (I assume that live interval analysis and the particular benchmark just happened to expose it). Results are at http://pastebin.com/5zeUDVXK. I'm not entirely sure what is wrong here - I assume it has something to do with my 'special'

So, an update. I have managed to generate comments, although it does create a non-existent instruction. My method is as follows (and I would appreciate any comments on how to do it "better", although note that this won't make it into the final code :).) 1. I declared a "fake" instruction type to hold comments, ala: class FakeInst<dag outs, dag ins, string asmstr,

On Oct 23, 2012, at 2:10 AM, Stephen McGruer <stephen.mcgruer at gmail.com> wrote: > I have a target backend which is currently causing live interval analysis to throw 'Interval not live at use' errors for many of my benchmarks. I imagine that this is caused by missing information for my target (probably in the instructioninfo tablegen?), but I am having difficulties in both

Yeh, I eventually figured that out. Thanks for responding though. Jack ________________________________________ From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] on behalf of llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu] Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:00 AM To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: LLVMdev Digest, Vol 89, Issue 47 Send LLVMdev mailing list

Hello Guys,From this morning, I have been always trying PrintFunctionNames - an example of clang, but during compiling I was always meeting "__ZTIN5clang15PluginASTActionE", referenced from: __ZTI24PrintFunctionNamesAction in PrintFunctionNames.cpp.o.In fact, I didn't have "__ZTIN5clang15PluginASTActionE" in the symbol table, only I have was

Hello Guys,From this morning, I have been always trying PrintFunctionNames - an example of clang, but during compiling I was always meeting "__ZTIN5clang15PluginASTActionE", referenced from: __ZTI24PrintFunctionNamesAction in PrintFunctionNames.cpp.o.In fact, I didn't have "__ZTIN5clang15PluginASTActionE" in the symbol table, only I have was

Hello Guys,From this morning, I have been always trying PrintFunctionNames - an example of clang, but during compiling I was always meeting "__ZTIN5clang15PluginASTActionE", referenced from:&nbsp;__ZTI24PrintFunctionNamesAction in PrintFunctionNames.cpp.o.In fact, I didn't have "__ZTIN5clang15PluginASTActionE" in the symbol table, only I have was

On 06/04/2012 02:00 PM, yangzhi0104 at sohu.com wrote: > Hello Guys, > > From this morning, I have been always trying PrintFunctionNames - an example of clang, but during compiling I was always meeting "__ZTIN5clang15PluginASTActionE", referenced from: > __ZTI24PrintFunctionNamesAction in PrintFunctionNames.cpp.o. > > In fact, I didn't have

Hi Ralph I do not think using xattr_tdb is the right thing to do for my purpose. We do not wish to store/retrieve extended attributes to/from TDB file. *<Ralph>* *Iirc parsing NFSv4 ACLs would require extensions to the module to support the string identifiers and mapping to ids.* *</Ralph>* Can you please elaborate more on which extensions you referred to? What all basic things do

Hi Stephen, On 13/12/12 18:58, Stephen McGruer wrote: > I'm wondering if the documentation for LoopPass > (http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html#LoopPass) is misleading or > incorrect (or if I'm just missing something.) The documentation states: > > "The doFinalization method ... is called when the pass framework has finished > calling runOnLoop

Ivan, Sorry, no, I wasn't clear enough. Both "op dst_reg,immediate,src_reg" and "op dst_reg,src_reg,immediate" are allowed in the ALU ops. For most instructions these are two different things - e.g. sub a,5,b is different from sub,a,b,5 obviously - but for things like add they just define the same thing. My problem is that LLVM won't allow immediates on the LHS of

Your smb.conf is incorrect/incomplete. Info here on these 2 links. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_rid Your smb.conf > >> [global] > >> max log size = 0 > >> realm = DOMAIN.COM > >> workgroup = DOMAIN > >> security = ADS > >> winbind enum users = yes >

Hello Guys, From this morning, I have been always trying PrintFunctionNames - an example of clang, but during compiling I was always meeting "__ZTIN5clang15PluginASTActionE", referenced from: __ZTI24PrintFunctionNamesAction in PrintFunctionNames.cpp.o. In fact, I didn't have "__ZTIN5clang15PluginASTActionE" in the symbol table, only I have was

I just started using llvm and trying to use some basic commands of llvm, when i tried to execute clang -cc1 ~/hello.c -ast-print, i'm getting the error : 'fatal error: 'stdio.h' file not found' #include<stdio.h> ^int main(){ printf("hi\n"); return 0;} 1 error generated. so please help me out. Thanks! -------------- next part