Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] LLVM master will be unavailable tonight"
2013 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM master will be unavailable tonight
Hello everyone,
I have migrated the buildmaster to the PostgreSQL.
All the data has been preserved and all builds are valid (none of the
builds has been affected by the migration and restart).
I have tested and watched it over the weekend, and it seems everything
works fine.
The response time of the WebUI is fine.
Please let me know if you will see or notice anything odd.
Thanks
Galina
On
2013 Jan 14
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] LLVM master will be unavailable tonight
Galina, it seems (at least) bbmaster works better, displayed within a
few seconds.
Thank you!
2013/1/14 Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have migrated the buildmaster to the PostgreSQL.
> All the data has been preserved and all builds are valid (none of the builds
> has been affected by the migration and restart).
>
> I have tested and
2017 Jan 13
2
LLVM buildmaster will be unavailable on 1/13/17
Hello everyone,
LLVM buildmaster will be offline on 1/13/17 hopefully for short time due
for replacing network hardware.
Thank you for understanding.
Thanks
Galina
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170112/cafe6991/attachment.html>
2013 Jan 22
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM buildmaster will be unavailable for short time tonight
Hello,
LLVM buildbot master will be stopped tonight for short time due to
maintenance jobs.
Thanks for understanding.
Thanks
Galina
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130121/e38ef221/attachment.html>
2017 Aug 06
2
Staging buildmaster down?
Hey all,
It seems that the main buildmaster here is working fine
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/
However, I have a 'connection refused' error whilst connecting to the
staging buildmaster
http://lab.llvm.org:8014/
Are you aware of this Victor and Galina?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2012 Dec 11
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
The problem remains after the buildmaster restart.
Thanks
Galina
-----Original Message-----
From: David Blaikie [mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 11:42 AM
To: Galina Kistanova
Cc: Duncan Sands; llvm-lab-wg at lists.minormatter.com; Galina Kistanova; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
On Tue,
2012 Dec 11
3
[LLVMdev] [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
Hello everyone,
It might make sense to start from rebooting the buildmaster, just to make sure everything is all right on this end.
Yesterday I have tried to apply the latest changes from zorg and some of them are broken.
Theoretically, checkconfig shouldn't affect the working instance, but the reality could be different...
I planned to rollback to the last known-to-be-good revision and
2017 Dec 06
3
buildbot failure in LLVM on llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win
I’ve had another look, and some of the failing tests don’t use temporary files, so I don’t think this is a case of tests having side-effects.
Instead, I’ve noticed that in the build log (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win/builds/6552/steps/build-unified-tree/logs/stdio), llvm-tblgen.exe is built (my patch modified it), but the table-generation steps of the
2014 Nov 26
2
[LLVMdev] LVM buildmaster will be restarted today after 6 PM Pacific
Hello everyone,
LLVM buildmaster will be restarted today after 6 PM Pacific time today.
Thanks
Galina
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20141126/2d94025c/attachment.html>
2012 Dec 11
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Galina Kistanova
<gkistanova at accesssoftek.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> It might make sense to start from rebooting the buildmaster, just to make sure everything is all right on this end.
> Yesterday I have tried to apply the latest changes from zorg and some of them are broken.
> Theoretically, checkconfig shouldn't affect the
2012 Nov 15
3
[LLVMdev] Code Ownership - Buildbot
I'd like to take code ownership of the LLVM Buildbot code.
Thanks
Galina
2011 Oct 10
4
[LLVMdev] New buildmaster is up and running
Hello everyone,
LLVM buildmaster is up and running as lab.llvm.org:8011.
Daniel Berlin is working on getting the current buildslave passwords
from the old buildmaster, but this may not be possible.
I'd suggest changing buildslave passwords anyway, just in case.
Buildslave owners, please contact me directly with your new passwords
and I'll update the master as soon as I can.
Thanks
2012 Dec 17
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
This issue is back: FNT bots are reporting success in spite of tests failing,
and the "report" text is empty again. Did someone change something?
Ciao, Duncan.
On 12/12/12 07:53, Duncan Sands wrote:
> On 11/12/12 23:16, Galina Kistanova wrote:
>> The problem remains after the buildmaster restart.
>
> The FNT builders are now all failing again, and the "report"
2012 Dec 12
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
On 11/12/12 23:16, Galina Kistanova wrote:
> The problem remains after the buildmaster restart.
The FNT builders are now all failing again, and the "report" is no longer
empty. Does anyone know what fixed them?
Ciao, Duncan.
>
> Thanks
>
> Galina
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Blaikie [mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday,
2020 Jan 20
2
LLVM buildmaster will be updated and restarted tonight
Hello everyone,
LLVM buildmaster will be updated and restarted after 5PM Pacific time today.
Thanks
Galina
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200120/567b3b5a/attachment.html>
2015 Jun 18
2
[LLVMdev] Contributing a buildbot for the BPF backend
Thank you.
Alexei just committed the change to SVN.
Regards,
Marco Leogrande
Sent by a carbon-based life form; hence, it may contain repetitions,
inaccuracies, logical fallacies and repetitions.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:
> LGTM.
> Please commit.
>
> Thanks
>
> Galina
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:32 PM,
2019 Jan 31
2
[RFC] migrating past C++11
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 21:05, JF Bastien via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> The patch is about ready to land, which means any older compiler will soft-error (which you can turn off with LLVM_TEMPORARILY_ALLOW_OLD_TOOLCHAIN). I think we should then cherry-pick the patch to the LLVM 8 branch.
>
> The last remaining issue are the buildbots. I audited *all* bots in
2011 Sep 14
0
[LLVMdev] Llvm build master status?
Hello everyone,
May be google1 build master cold be moved to lab.llvm.org machines?
Do anybody use it?
Thanks
Galina
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
>> I am working on it, but it may not happen until this weekend
>
> thanks a lot for working on this.
>
> Best wishes, Duncan.
>
>>
>> On Wed,
2011 Sep 14
1
[LLVMdev] Llvm build master status?
google5 is up, i'm just working on copying the buildmaster config.
If you want to move it to lab.llvm, that's fine too.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> May be google1 build master cold be moved to lab.llvm.org machines?
> Do anybody use it?
>
> Thanks
>
> Galina
>
>
>
> On
2011 Sep 07
3
[LLVMdev] Llvm build master status?
Hi Daniel,
> I am working on it, but it may not happen until this weekend
thanks a lot for working on this.
Best wishes, Duncan.
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Duncan Sands<baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>>> [12:07pm] DannyB_: for security reasons, google1 and google2 (google1
>>> is the main llvm build master)
>>>