similar to: [LLVMdev] Make a comparation with IR builder

Hi Justin, my class is a visitor pattern and I use accept method to go recursive in suboject in my AST. In locals I store AllocaInst pointer. void *visit(var1_init_decl_c *symbol) { llvm::Type *lType; varNames.clear(); varType = ""; symbol->var1_list->accept(*this); /* get a vector contains variable names */ symbol->spec_init->accept(*this); /* Store in

you're not showing enough code. What does accept() do? Based on your description, I strongly suspect that your alloca and constant are not the same type. Remember that alloca returns a pointer type that you must load to get at the actual variable. On Jan 11, 2013 3:28 AM, "Manuele Conti" <manuele.conti at sirius-es.it> wrote: > Hi All, > I'm writing a code

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Manuele Conti <manuele.conti at sirius-es.it>wrote: > Hi Justin, > my class is a visitor pattern and I use accept method to go recursive in > suboject in my AST. > In locals I store AllocaInst pointer. > > > void *visit(var1_init_decl_c *symbol) { > llvm::Type *lType; > > varNames.clear(); > varType = "";

Sorry I forgot to add code that I use to run code: /* Executes the AST by running the main function */ GenericValue CodeGenContext::runCode() { std::cout << "Running code...\n"; ExecutionEngine *ee = EngineBuilder(module).create(); vector<GenericValue> noargs; GenericValue v = ee->runFunction(mainFunction, noargs); std::cout << "Code was run.\n"; return v;

Hi All, I tryed to create a global structured derived declaration in my compiler by: StructType *st = StructType(getGlobalContext(), elements, false); In dump module i didn't find any code needed to declare a new user data type. Is there a instruction to add this class into current module? Cheers, Manuele

On Jan 8, 2013, at 8:09 , Manuele Conti <manuele.conti at sirius-es.it> wrote: > Sorry I forgot to add code that I use to run code: > /* Executes the AST by running the main function */ > GenericValue CodeGenContext::runCode() { > std::cout << "Running code...\n"; > ExecutionEngine *ee = EngineBuilder(module).create(); > < > div

Hi Rick, you are right! But can you call this method EngineBuilder::setErrorStr to get creation error? Cheers, Manuele Il 08/01/2013 20:27, Rick Mann ha scritto: > On Jan 8, 2013, at 8:09 , Manuele Conti <manuele.conti at sirius-es.it> wrote: > >> Sorry I forgot to add code that I use to run code: >> /* Executes the AST by running the main function */ >>

On Nov 12, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Manman (and llvmdev), > > I filed these two bugs to track the ideas that I was cooking: > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17891 > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17892 > > TL;DR:

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > I'm moderately opposed to just encoding these in a string format. I think > we can do something substantially better both for space, time, and > readability. Fundamentally, there is no reason for the original metadata > node you describe to not *encode* its operands into a dense bit-packed blob

Hi Manman (and llvmdev), I filed these two bugs to track the ideas that I was cooking: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17891 http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17892 TL;DR: I'm saying we should go from: !14 = metadata !{i32 786445, metadata !1, metadata !10, metadata !"y", i32 3, i64 32, i64 32, i64 32, i32 0, metadata !13} to: !14 = metadata

Hi Rick, I had the same problem last week I understand that I didn't initialized target. Cheers, Manuele Il 08/01/2013 16:08, Rick Mann ha scritto: > I wrote a little OS X app to assemble some LLVM (human-readable) code and run it. Unfortunately, my ExecutionEngine won't create. Just comes back NULL. > > This is the code that builds it: > > http://pastebin.com/8cexgPj7

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Manman (and llvmdev), > > I filed these two bugs to track the ideas that I was cooking: > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17891 > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17892 > > TL;DR: I'm saying we should go from: > > !14 = metadata !{i32 786445, metadata !1,

I wrote a little OS X app to assemble some LLVM (human-readable) code and run it. Unfortunately, my ExecutionEngine won't create. Just comes back NULL. This is the code that builds it: http://pastebin.com/8cexgPj7 This is the code it seems to successfully assemble, but it can't build the ExecutionEngine. You can see I tried several different ways of building it.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 First of all, I'm a physicist and therefore I'm not much used to use statistics. So, please forgive me if this is a FAQ or stupid, but I failed to find the answer by myself. I want to use corr.test to test for the correlation of two data sets (actually I have a lot of data set and perform pairwise testing). But I wanted to find sets where the

I have seen that the hist() function plots an histogram of the frequency but I cannot find the value of the object hist that contains theese values... how is possible to get out them? thank you very mutch best regards Manuele -- Manuele Pesenti manuele a inventati.org amicogodzilla a jabber.linux.it http://mpesenti.polito.it

I've not had a good chance to look at the patches in detail, but just to clarify one point: I don't really care whether we number things going up or down from single threaded to "every thread". I just think it makes sense to expose them in the in-memory IR interface as an enum with a particular ordering so that code can use the obvious sorts of tests for comparing two orderings

Hi, Nick, thanks for the reply. I still have a problem: I only need to "clone" an Instruction, changing its type. That is, I would like to keep all characteristics of the old Instruction and create a new one only with a different type. I am trying create a new Instruction thus: %3 = add nsw i32 %1, %2 ; <i16> [#uses=2] //Old Instruction Value* Op0 = I->getOperand(0); Value*

Dear R users, just another little question... are there other ways, I mean more easy to write, to obtain the same result I got with: data[95:length(dati[,1]), ] where data is a data frame to extract the last elements starting from a fixed position? thank you very much best regards Manuele PEsenti -- Manuele Pesenti manuele a inventati.org amicogodzilla a jabber.linux.it

Dear R users, how can I extrapolate values listed in the summary of an lm model but not directly available between object values such as the the standard errors of the calculated parameters? for example I got a model: mod <- lm(Crd ~ 1 + Week, data=data) and its summary: > summary(mod) Call: lm(formula = Crd ~ 1 + Week, data = data, model = TRUE, y = TRUE) Residuals: Min

On 01/24/2011 04:41 AM, Douglas do Couto Teixeira wrote: > Hi, > > Nick, thanks for the reply. > I still have a problem: I only need to "clone" an Instruction, changing > its type. That is, I would like to keep all characteristics of the old > Instruction and create a new one only with a different type. Sure, but what about its operands? An "add" instruction