similar to: [LLVMdev] Porting LLVM, clang et al. to GNU/Hurd

Hi Thomas, it sounds like all the changes you need are to clang, and nothing in LLVM proper needs to be changed. Is that right? Ciao, Duncan.

Hi, These patches are from Robert Bihlmeyer to make ssh build on Hurd. If you have queries about them, I suggest contacting debian-hurd at lists.debian.org. Cheers, Matthew -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: openssh-2.9-hurd.diff Url:

Hi, here's a patch so that ssh also supports hurd-i386. Thanks for incorporating. The patch comes from Robert Bihlmeyer <robbe at orcus.priv.at>. > openssh 2.2.0p1-1.1 does not build on the Hurd. The appended patch > fixes that. Changes in detail: > * PAM is not (yet?) supported, so the PAM dependencies are only put into > the control file on architectures != hurd-i386.

Even though the list of checks is very short, at least this migrates from imperative checks to a "declarative" one. There should be no behaviour change, other than using os-release if it contains all the needed information. --- daemon/inspect_fs_unix.ml | 19 ++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/inspect_fs_unix.ml

Add a mapping for the Hurd device names, so it is possible to enable the inspection of /etc/fstab. --- src/inspect-fs-unix.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/inspect-fs-unix.c b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c index 3f57cd5..b629508 100644 --- a/src/inspect-fs-unix.c +++ b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ static pcre

I've made two little patches to allow dovecot to be compiled on GNU/Hurd. Could you review them? Kind regards, Marco Nenciarini -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- | Marco Nenciarini | Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plug Member | | mnencia at prato.linux.it | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia |

Hi, I''m glad to announce that I have mostly finished a port of GNU Mach to Xen, so that GNU/Hurd/Mach/Xen now works :) Samuel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

I am working with multiboot module "mboot.c32". I have had luck using it to boot NetBSD and the Hurd kernel. The problem with booting the Hurd kernel is apparently connected to the extended syntax passed along to it by grub. Grub passes Hurd kernel approximately 4 files, some of which are modules, and another ten (or so) boot arguments, which correspond to those modules and kernel. The

This is a small/trivial patch to get HURD to _compile_ (I haven't gotten PRNG to work yet) openssh. All it does is define MAXHOSTNAMELEN in defines.h if it isn't already defined (there may need to be a library loaded first, or you may want to incorporate that patch into canohost.c instead of defines.h). Anyway, small patch for canohost.c and defines.h because HURD doesn't use

Hi, I've gone and ported the latest version of openssh, 3.1p1, to GNU/Hurd. I've tried to learn from the other threads on this topic, but I still had to get rid of MAXHOSTNAMELEN where I could. James A. Morrison diff -urN openssh-3.1p1.old/Makefile.in openssh-3.1p1/Makefile.in --- openssh-3.1p1.old/Makefile.in Tue Feb 26 14:24:22 2002 +++ openssh-3.1p1/Makefile.in Tue Apr 9 16:16:49

Damn, forgot the rest of the patch. Here it comes. diff -Nur openssh-2.2.0p1-/ssh-keygen.c openssh-2.2.0p1/ssh-keygen.c --- openssh-2.2.0p1-/ssh-keygen.c Wed Aug 23 02:46:24 2000 +++ openssh-2.2.0p1/ssh-keygen.c Sun Oct 29 16:44:50 2000 @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static const char *__progname = "ssh-keygen"; #endif /* HAVE___PROGNAME */ -char hostname[MAXHOSTNAMELEN]; +char

Hi, I recently downloaded and built dovecot-2.2.2 and dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole-0.4.0 on GNU/Linux and GNU/Hurd. The changes needed will be sent to the Debian maintainer shortly. Latest Debian release is 2.1.7-7 and dovecot-2.1-pigeonhole-0.3.1. When building dovecot-2.2.2 there were no PATH_MAX problems on GNU/Hurd, thank you for that. However, pigeonhole 0.4.0 had one remaining PATH_MAX construct.

On 05/02/2015 18:34, Hans Wennborg wrote: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> Source and binaries for LLVM 3.6.0-rc2 are now available at >> http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.6.0/ >> >> Please try them out, run tests, build your favourite projects, and >> *file bugs* about anything that

pv-grub is also the best/only way to run hurd under xen: http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/microkernel/mach/gnumach/ports/xen.html#index4h1 it's also the best way by far to run netbsd without a separate /boot Cheers, Brian Szymanski -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello, I'm a French student in computing science and I'm interested in your llvm project. We plan to build a new OS design using the Mozart-Oz language ( http://hurd.gnufans.org/bin/view/Hurd/NextHurd ). Could we "easily" implement a Mozart front-end to llvm ? Do you think llvm could be a good alternative to gcc for our project ? http://www.mozart-oz.org

Hi all, I would really like to get a patch into 3.6 for libc++. The patch renames template parameters with the names '_A' and '_V' to longer names. '_A' is frequently defined in ctypes.h and that could cause libc++ to not compile. I'm fairly sure the code was added between 3.5 and 3.6 so that would make this a regression. The patch can be found here:

When parsing "xdev"-kind devices, do not assume that the partition number can be converted to integer: re_xdev accepts an empty part of the partition number, so just handle as it is, as string. This fixes a regression due to the conversion of the inspection code to OCaml, as the old C version did not have this issue. --- daemon/inspect_fs_unix_fstab.ml | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3

Hi, I am new to R, but a fairly `old' user of Stata. I read posts asking about survey methods and large datasets in the archive, so I will not ask those questions again. But some still remain: - R seems to consume more memory given the same set of data, say if I have only a data frame defined, than Stata. Am I right if I think that this is because the object oriented nature of R and can

Hi, I am new to R, but a fairly `old' user of Stata. I read posts asking about survey methods and large datasets in the archive, so I will not ask those questions again. But some still remain: - R seems to consume more memory given the same set of data, say if I have only a data frame defined, than Stata. Am I right if I think that this is because the object oriented nature of R and can

Marshall, you're the owner here. Is this OK to merge? On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > Yes, please. > > -Dimitry > >> On 06 Feb 2015, at 16:07, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I would really like to get a patch into 3.6 for libc++. The patch >> renames