similar to: [LLVMdev] Cleaning out the Release Notes

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > Hi all, the release notes (docs/ReleaseNotes.rst) seem like it is > mostly a holdover from 3.2, (the removal of CellSPU is in there > though). > > Would anybody be opposed to me cleaning this out so that the actual > changes from 3.3 are the only ones there? I don't think there's a reason to

FYI I am bout to convert LangRef. it should be done by the end of today. Please keep me up to date with any work you do on the other documents. -- Sean Silva On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > Thanks for doing this. > > I was planning on finishing these by this weekend. If you are planning > on taking significantly longer than that I

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: > We have to options: > (a) replace 'FileCheck' with '%FileCheck' in all tests, and teach > 'lit' to replace '%FileCheck' with 'FileCheck --dump-input-on-error'; > > (b) teach 'lit' to replace a plain 'FileCheck'. > > The first approach

Hello, JFYI so that no work will be duplicated. My colleagues and I will take care of converting the rest of the documentation to rst. Dmitri -- main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/

On Jan 17, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >>> We have to options: >>> (a) replace 'FileCheck' with '%FileCheck' in all tests, and teach

Hello, I'm converting HowToReleaseLLVM.html, expect to finish today. -- Alexander Zinenko On 6 December 2012 21:14, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > FYI I am bout to convert LangRef. it should be done by the end of > today. Please keep me up to date with any work you do on the other > documents. > > -- Sean Silva > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:12 PM,

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >> We have to options: >> (a) replace 'FileCheck' with '%FileCheck' in all tests, and teach >> 'lit' to replace '%FileCheck' with 'FileCheck --dump-input-on-error';

On Jan 17, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Jan 17, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: >>>> On Thu,

Hello, Why do we have letter-spacing: -0.01em in the CSS generated by Sphinx? Could we remove that? It makes the main text font look really bad for me (I can attach an image if anyone wishes to take a look). Fonts already have appropriate tracking built-in, so trying to change that, especially without knowing the font name beforehand, is shooting oneself into the foot. Dmitri --

Thanks for doing this. I was planning on finishing these by this weekend. If you are planning on taking significantly longer than that I would appreciate if you just ping me in IRC (or email, but IRC is more lightweight) whenever you (or one of your colleagues) starts on a document, so that we can safely work concurrently. -- Sean Silva On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Dmitri Gribenko

Looking through the history with git, it looks like it was just grandfathered in from the original template that the current template is based off of. I don't think that it is going to hurt to remove it. Also, another problem with the current CSS is that some of the different heading types (IIRC in particular <h2> and <h3>) are very difficult to distinguish, which makes some

Add several .gitignore rules to various directories to ensure a clean worktree after a default build. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon at gmail.com> --- Just cloned and built LLVM. This annoyed me. Here's a trivial patch. .gitignore | 10 ++++++++++ bindings/ocaml/llvm/.gitignore | 1 + docs/.gitignore

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 17, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 17, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >>>

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 17, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> We have to

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >>>

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov <eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >>>>

On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > Looking through the history with git, it looks like it was just > grandfathered in from the original template that the current template > is based off of. I don't think that it is going to hurt to remove it. > > Also, another problem with the current CSS is that some of the > different heading

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> When someone breaks a FileCheck-based test on some buildbot, sometimes >> it may not be obvious *why* did it fail. If the failure can not be >> reproduced locally, it can

Note that as far as places to put temporary files, the right place to put them is alongside the other test outputs in the test output "sandbox" directory. Somewhat orthogonal, but we should also fix up lit to purge those sandboxes before it starts a new test run. - Daniel On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013

On 03/02/2013 04:50 AM, Dmitri Gribenko wrote: > You also need tests for Clang bits, too. > > Mechanical issues: > > +/// getTileRegisterNumbering - Given the enum value for some register, > +/// return the number that it corresponds to. > > Please don't duplicate function and class name in comments. Existing > code does this, but current style guidelines advise not