similar to: [LLVMdev] Basic commands of llvm : fatal error

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >>>

Hello, JFYI so that no work will be duplicated. My colleagues and I will take care of converting the rest of the documentation to rst. Dmitri -- main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov <eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >>>>

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> When someone breaks a FileCheck-based test on some buildbot, sometimes >> it may not be obvious *why* did it fail. If the failure can not be >> reproduced locally, it can

Note that as far as places to put temporary files, the right place to put them is alongside the other test outputs in the test output "sandbox" directory. Somewhat orthogonal, but we should also fix up lit to purge those sandboxes before it starts a new test run. - Daniel On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: > We have to options: > (a) replace 'FileCheck' with '%FileCheck' in all tests, and teach > 'lit' to replace '%FileCheck' with 'FileCheck --dump-input-on-error'; > > (b) teach 'lit' to replace a plain 'FileCheck'. > > The first approach

Hi, I have istalled LLVM 3.1 Release+Asserts build. I was just trying out the hello world sequence of steps in the installation instructions. However when I run lli or llvm-dis I get an error "invalid MODULE_CODE_GLOBALVAR record". I have searched the web and I am not able to fathom what the problem and its fix is. I have GCC 4.6.3 running on a Ubuntu 12.04 LTS x86-64. Please let me

On Mageia 2 I have installed the binary clang package clang3.0-7. When I tried to build the latest llvm/clang from source using this binary clang I get this error: 1) In file included from /home/mgeldiener/vcs/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:30: /home/mgeldiener/vcs/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:32:10: fatal error: 'cxxabi.h' file not found #include <cxxabi.h> ^ llvm[1]:

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> > wrote: > > Chandler, > > > > I may be doing this wrong, but I'm getting a weird error in building LLVM > > with Clang via CMake. > > I have been debugging a similar issue that I isolated

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov > <eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote:

Hello, This came up on IRC in context of r173842, and it was suggested to codify this unspoken rule. Current practice is not to use 'inline' in: class Foo { public: inline void bar() { // ... } }; Dmitri -- main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/

Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> writes: > Also, you don't need to do a 2-step bootstrap to catch warnings from > gcc. You also don't need a debug build, just an optimized one -- > since it is faster to link, and gcc emits more warnings when > optimization is no. Actually, there are cases a debug build catches that an optimized build doesn't because

Hello, When someone breaks a FileCheck-based test on some buildbot, sometimes it may not be obvious *why* did it fail. If the failure can not be reproduced locally, it can be very hard to fix. I propose adding a "very verbose" mode to FileCheck. In this mode FileCheck will dump the input file in case of failure. This mode will be enabled by an environment variable

Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:07 PM, <dag at cray.com> wrote: >> Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> writes: >> >>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:43 AM, <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: >>>> The document here explains pretty well how to add a buildslave to the >>>> buildbot:

Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:43 AM, <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: >> The document here explains pretty well how to add a buildslave to the >> buildbot: >> >> http://llvm.org/docs/HowToAddABuilder.html >> >> However, it's not clear to me how to add a new build config. I would >> like

FYI I am bout to convert LangRef. it should be done by the end of today. Please keep me up to date with any work you do on the other documents. -- Sean Silva On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > Thanks for doing this. > > I was planning on finishing these by this weekend. If you are planning > on taking significantly longer than that I

Hello, Why do we have letter-spacing: -0.01em in the CSS generated by Sphinx? Could we remove that? It makes the main text font look really bad for me (I can attach an image if anyone wishes to take a look). Fonts already have appropriate tracking built-in, so trying to change that, especially without knowing the font name beforehand, is shooting oneself into the foot. Dmitri --

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> When someone breaks a FileCheck-based test on some buildbot,

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Dmitri Gribenko via llvm-dev > > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:03 AM, James Molloy via

On 2016-01-30 07:39, Eric Christopher wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:38 PM whitequark <whitequark at whitequark.org> > wrote: > >> On 2016-01-30 07:36, Eric Christopher wrote: >>> It's known to be failing right now because of recent changes, but >> I'm >>> curious why that bot has ocaml installed for the bindings? >> >> I would