Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Build Failure"
2013 Jan 02
0
[LLVMdev] Build Failure
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:04 PM, <dag at cray.com> wrote:
> I'm getting a build failure with -Werror:
>
> [off-dbg] : [llvm] /ptmp/dag/llvm/official/llvm/lib/IR/Use.cpp: In member function 'llvm::User* llvm::Use::getUser() const':
> [off-dbg] : [llvm] /ptmp/dag/llvm/official/llvm/lib/IR/Use.cpp:142:14: error: cast from type 'const llvm::Use*' to type
2013 Jan 02
4
[LLVMdev] Build Failure
David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:04 PM, <dag at cray.com> wrote:
>> I'm getting a build failure with -Werror:
>>
>> [off-dbg] : [llvm] /ptmp/dag/llvm/official/llvm/lib/IR/Use.cpp: In member function 'llvm::User* llvm::Use::getUser() const':
>> [off-dbg] : [llvm]
>>
2013 Jan 02
0
[LLVMdev] Build Failure
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:31 PM, <dag at cray.com> wrote:
> David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:04 PM, <dag at cray.com> wrote:
>>> I'm getting a build failure with -Werror:
>>>
>>> [off-dbg] : [llvm] /ptmp/dag/llvm/official/llvm/lib/IR/Use.cpp: In member function 'llvm::User*
2009 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] SAFECode Source Code Released
On Monday 16 November 2009 14:18, John Criswell wrote:
> > Did I miss a message? I am getting tons of compiler errors building
> > poolalloc and safecode and am wondering if this patch would fix things.
>
> What platform are you building on? What types of errors are you
> seeing? Edwin's patch will fix warnings for SAFECode on 64-bit platforms.
I'm on a 64-bit
2007 Oct 08
2
[LLVMdev] Can't bootstrap llvm-gcc-4.0 for x84_64
I've been unable to bootstrap llvm-gcc-4.0 or -4.2 for x86_64
for some weeks now. The current problem is this:
[x86_64-mod-dbg]: ./xgcc -B./
-B/install.modified.debug/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
-isystem /install.modified.debug/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include
-isystem
2007 Oct 08
0
[LLVMdev] Can't bootstrap llvm-gcc-4.0 for x84_64
On Oct 8, 2007, at 12:50 PM, David Greene wrote:
> I've been unable to bootstrap llvm-gcc-4.0 or -4.2 for x86_64
> for some weeks now. The current problem is this:
>
> [x86_64-mod-dbg]: ./xgcc -B./
> -B/install.modified.debug/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-unknown-
> linux-gnu/bin/
> -isystem /install.modified.debug/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-
>
2011 Sep 01
2
[LLVMdev] Build Error
I'm getting this build error with -Werror:
[off-opt] : [llvm] cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
[off-opt] : [llvm] /ptmp/dag/llvm/official/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp: In member function 'llvm::MachineBasicBlock* llvm::ARMTargetLowering::EmitAtomicBinary64(llvm::MachineInstr*, llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, unsigned int, unsigned int, bool, bool) const':
[off-opt]
2007 Oct 08
2
[LLVMdev] Can't bootstrap llvm-gcc-4.0 for x84_64
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Evan Cheng wrote:
>> [x86_64-mod-dbg]: /tmp/ccxekXCc.s: Assembler messages:
>> [x86_64-mod-dbg]: /tmp/ccxekXCc.s:36: Error: `(%esi,%edi)' is not a
>> valid 64
>> bit base/index expression
>
> Looks like llvm is generating invalid x86-64 assembly. Can you add a -
> emit-llvm to the xgcc line and generate a reproducible test case?
> Please
2007 Oct 10
2
[LLVMdev] Can't bootstrap llvm-gcc-4.0 for x84_64
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Evan Cheng wrote:
> I am turning 32-bit add into 32-bit LEA on x86-64 but that's
> perfectly legal. Both
> leal (%esi,%edi), %eax
> leal (%rsi,%rdi), %eax
> are legal assembly. It's just the former requires a 67H prefix due to
> the 32-bit address size.
>
> This does point to a performance problem in the 3 address conversion
> code (which I
2010 Dec 08
0
[LLVMdev] Bad gcc versions
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:09:27 -0600
greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) wrote:
> Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > What are we left with then? Only 4.2 and 4.3?
>
> On SLES 10.1 at least. I think it is highly platform dependent.
Also keep in mind that llvm-gcc uses the 4.2 unwinder, so if you are
seeing EH failures maybe the EH info generated by
2010 Dec 08
2
[LLVMdev] Bad gcc versions
Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> writes:
> What are we left with then? Only 4.2 and 4.3?
On SLES 10.1 at least. I think it is highly platform dependent.
> I only use 4.4 since a while, and it works fairly well.
On what platform?
> Are you sure it is not a bug in the regression tests themselves
> (strict-aliasing bugs, etc.)?
No, I'm not sure.
> Which
2007 Oct 09
0
[LLVMdev] Can't bootstrap llvm-gcc-4.0 for x84_64
On Oct 8, 2007, at 4:26 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Evan Cheng wrote:
>>> [x86_64-mod-dbg]: /tmp/ccxekXCc.s: Assembler messages:
>>> [x86_64-mod-dbg]: /tmp/ccxekXCc.s:36: Error: `(%esi,%edi)' is not a
>>> valid 64
>>> bit base/index expression
>>
>> Looks like llvm is generating invalid x86-64 assembly. Can you add
2009 Nov 16
2
[LLVMdev] SAFECode Source Code Released
David Greene wrote:
> On Monday 16 November 2009 13:04, John Criswell wrote:
>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> I applied the attached patch to make it compile on my box (Debian
>>> x86_64), only to find out that x86_64 is not supported :(
>>> This architecture is not supported by the pool allocator!
>>> Aborted
>>>
>> Thanks
2010 Jul 10
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Start of SIMD Reorg
Hi David,
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:25 PM, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote:
> Now that Bruno is putting in some AVX stuff, it's a good motivator to
> move my x86 SIMD reorg work into trunk (and got management to agree to
> prioritize it - Thanks Bruno! :) ).
>
> Attached is the first patch of many to accomplish this. The overall
> goal is to have all x86 SIMD
2010 Jul 09
3
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Start of SIMD Reorg
Now that Bruno is putting in some AVX stuff, it's a good motivator to
move my x86 SIMD reorg work into trunk (and got management to agree to
prioritize it - Thanks Bruno! :) ).
Attached is the first patch of many to accomplish this. The overall
goal is to have all x86 SIMD instructions share a set of common patterns
so that we can have a more maintainable machine description (e.g. SS,
SD,
2010 Dec 09
2
[LLVMdev] Bad gcc versions
Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> writes:
>> > Which regression tests are failing with LLVM 2.8 and GCC 4.4.x?
>>
>> Too many to list.
>
> Can you give me 2 or 3 examples (that fail with LLVM 2.8 and GCC 4.4
> but work with LLVM 2.8 and GCC 4.3), also I'd like to know how they
> fail.
> If I have some time I'll check with my 4.4 to see if
2013 Jan 02
2
[LLVMdev] Build Failure
David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> writes:
>>> There's little effort to keep the GCC build warning clean,
>>
>> Why? It seems like a pertty important compiler to support.
>
> It has some silly warnings (at least in some versions) that we don't
> want to workaround/suppress. Arguably we could have the build system
> check version information &
2020 Apr 23
3
Cannot build master
I am nuilding that now.
CC=clang CXX=clang++ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$HOME/opt/llvm11-git \
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \
-DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON \
-DLLVM_ENABLE_EH=ON \
-DLLVM_ENABLE_RTTI=ON \
-DLLVM_HOST_TRIPLE=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu \
-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="AMDGPU;MSP430;WebAssembly;X86" \
2008 Aug 13
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc bootstrap failure
I'm getting the following when building llvm-gcc with an optimized set of
LLVM libraries:
/ptmp/dag/build.llvm-gcc-4.2.trunk.official.opt/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/./gcc/xgcc
-B/ptmp/dag/build.llvm-gcc-4.2.trunk.official.opt/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/./gcc/
-B/cray/iss/compiler/cost/tools/llvm-tools/llvm/install.trunk.official.opt/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
2020 Apr 23
7
Cannot build master
Hi,
Using master at b0a1c0b72c9c61f8b0a223e08f43498abb64f5e8, I cannot build
LLVM. I configured with:
CC=clang CXX=clang++ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$HOME/opt/llvm11-git \
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \
-DLLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON \
-DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON \
-DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF \
-DLLVM_ENABLE_EH=ON \
-DLLVM_ENABLE_RTTI=ON \