similar to: [LLVMdev] verification methods for correctness of a compiler

Hi All, Could anyone point me to some good benchmarking tools to measure the runtime performance of clang compiled C++ applications. Thanks ! - Jyoti -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131003/3cc029f1/attachment.html>

hello sir myself Jyoti Sharma, and i am working as preoject fellow in IGIB Delhi. I need your help to know how to create a package as well as how to post that package to the CRAN mirror, for public use. i have used package.skeleton() command but its not working properly. So, please suggest me the right way asap. i'll be very thankful to you. Jyoti Sharma JRF @IGIB

Hello Sir/ma'am, Greetings for the Day ! I am Jyoti Sharma, from India and recently start working on R. I am new in this field and my knowledge is not up to the mark, so if I sound dumb then please forgive me. I tried to read some text file in R so that I can do further analysis on those files. All files are MicroRNA dataset and in exiqon format. When I write function ReadExi and path of my

Hello, I use Tim's mboot.c32 to load multiboot kernels over pxelinux. However, some kernels require the symbol table and other information in the ELF section header table to be able to load properly. This functionality is not present in mboot.c now, so I added support for it. The patch is attached. It would be great if you can push this into the next release of syslinux so ELF multiboot

Hi Keep your answers to R help (others can help you too) From the warning message it seems to me possible that function ReadExi needs to write something to the working directory. As I said I am not an expert in this package, but commands from help R> make.gal.env(galname='galenv', gal.path='Exiqon') R> ebatch <- ReadExi(galname='galenv',

Hello, I noticed after upgrading from 3.20, I haven't been able to get syslinux to boot properly with menu.c32 or mboot.c32 from a USB key. I get an error saying invalid kernel when its trying to load menu.c32 or mboot.c32 (or any other kernel for that matter). I tried 3.35 and 3.36-pre5. Same exact behaviour. I'm using the following to compile: gcc version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux

Here is the patch for making syslinux enable opening partitions with fat filesystems (well, the architecture is in place to make it open other filesystems too). Usage is like this: #include <syslinux/io.h> #include <syslinux/partitions.h> #include <fs/fat/libfat.h> syslinux_devdesc dfd; struct libfat_filesystem* fs; diskinfo disk_info; char mbr[512]; static part_entry

Hey, Looks like read disk function which was launched in 3.35 isnt working. Did anyone test this on any hardware? I'm using it thru the com32 interface to read contents of the active partition of a USB boot key (syslinux). I did a sample test like: void scanAndPrint() { com32sys_t regs_in; char *sectorBuf = __com32.cs_bounce; int i; memset(sectorBuf, 0x0, 512); // XXX MARK 1

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Vikram S. Adve <vadve at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > On Apr 4, 2008, at 4:51 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:38 AM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> On Apr 2, 2008, at 10:11 PM, Xuehai Qian wrote: > >>> Hi LLVMers, > >>> I am a PHD student in CS dept in UIUC,

Hi James/Tim, I am trying to add a patterns for SMLALBB I think these two assembly patterns can be reduced to SMLALBB using tablegen. 1) smulbb r2, r3, r2 adds r0, r2, r0 (RdLo) asr r3, r2, #31 adc r1, r3, r1 (RdHi) ==> smlalbb r0, r1, r3, r2 I have added pattern in def SMLALBB : AMulxyI64< ..... as below :- [] modified to ---> [((set GPR:$RdLo,

Hello All, I am looking at exploring what benefits SAFECode has to offer over clang S.A and llvm's instrumentation tools like memory sanitizer and address sanitizer. I could come up with the following that are not provided in ASAN/MSAN/Clang S.A -> dangling pointer error and detection -> crashes in system libraries due to security vulnerabilities. In the process, I wanted to run the

I updated my version and the problem no longer occurred. Thank you! =D Em qua, 22 de ago de 2018 às 17:08, Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com> escreveu: > On 08/22/2018 03:30 PM, Eduardo Lúcio Amorim Costa wrote: > > I'm trying create a virtual machine using Xen as hypervisor and > > virt-manager (libvirt) as the management module. When trying to create > > the

This is a resend since I didn't hear back from anyone. Hey guys, I noticed the appended ipappend options end up in the beginning of the cmdline argv[] when mboot is entered. mboot then tries to parse the first argument as the name of the kernel module and promptly fails cuz it can't find "ip=.." or "bootif=...". I'm attaching a patch which basically looks for any

Is it normal for pxelinux to append something like BOOTIF=01-aa-bb-cc-dd-ee-ff ? the leading 01- is there in my config file name, but this doesn't seem to be right behaviour. Can someone confirm if this is a bug? I tried this on syslinux 3.21. thanks. -- Ram Yalamanchili

I am seeing this with llvm generated code, and before also saw this with gcc generated code. In unoptimized code, debugger would say something like this when the variable isn't used any more, but is still in scope: (gdb) p this $11 = <optimized out> Looking at the debug records, I don't see what is wrong, for example: call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata !{%struct.Object* %1},

On Wednesday 09 July 2008 12:16, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:56 AM, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote: > > I seem to recall havbing asked this before but I can't find it by > > searching. > > > > What's the right way to clone a Function? I need to save off the text at > > a certain point and spit it out later, after other

On 22/06/2020 14:00, Fernando Gon?alves wrote: > Good morning Rowland. > > As you may have noticed, I am no expert in deploying SAMBA in an AD > domain. > Could you give me a link with a tutorial that explains in a simple way > the procedure for this? You could start here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member > > Just to not leave

Hi, I am planning to use LLVM for a compiler validation project that checks if the optimized version of the code is the correct translation of the unoptimized code. And I have a couple of questions. I need two pieces of information from the compiler: 1) Some kind of mapping between the structure of the unoptimized and optimized code. It seems, that can be obtained via the llvm.dbg.stoppoint

Hi Devs, Consider testcase here https://godbolt.org/z/qHZzqw When optimization is O1 or above it produces unoptimized code because it calls __tls_get_address in loops. While with optimization disabled It produce single call to __tls_get_address outside of loop. is this a missed optimization by llvm? ./Kamlesh

Dear Speex community, I am having problems to get the Speex Decoding API to work properly in our project. I am working in an embedded project with a very limited RAM and Flash memory and would like to use Speex encoded files to save memory while having good voice sounds in our speakers. I have developed a Windows-based tool to convert WAV files to Speex files in packets of 160 bytes (we are