similar to: [LLVMdev] JIT crashes Microsoft Visual Studio 2012 when Disassembly Window opens

pls read the page of http://llvm.org/builds/ : To use the LLVM toolchain from Visual Studio, select a project in Solution Explorer, open its Property Page (Alt+F7 by default), and in the "General" section of "Configuration Properties" change "Platform Toolset" to "LLVM-vs2010" or "LLVM-vs2012". Alternatively, invoke MSBuild with

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Gao, Yunzhong <yunzhong_gao at playstation.sony.com> wrote: > Hi, > Sorry for the delay in responding, we have been discussing this internally > and have not had time to do a proper investigation. > >> We absolutely have to ship a set of DLLs that run hosted in VS2012. Is >> there any sort of runtime incompatibility that would happen

I am using mvs 2012 but the .sln provided is of msv 2010 so on opening .sln it tries to update libraries which is successful but I am unable to build (compile) it as it gives series of errors. I am pretty new to these things so can anyone tell me if I am doing anything wrong or how to create(.lib and .dll) files so I can use them in my project. Please forgive me if I have asked something foolish.

On 2013-10-29 2:39 PM, Akshit Jain wrote: > Thanks a lot for replying. This is the output > >>------ Build started: Project: celt, Configuration: Debug Win32 ------ > 1> fatal: No names found, cannot describe anything. > 1> The system cannot find the file C:\Users\user\Desktop\mUOn\Audio. > 1> #define OPUS_VERSION ""=">

>From this website: http://llvm.org/builds/ I've installed the LLVM toolchain on 2 Windows machines. One with Visual Studio 2012 and another with Visual Studio 2013. After installing the LLVM toolchain neither machine shows the LLVM option in the Visual Studio project properties pane where you can select which toolchain to use for the project. Am I missing a step somewhere? :) Thanks for

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 22 August 2014 13:43, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote: >> My opposition to this switch was the timing. When we researched "what >> minimum can we live with for C++11" nine months ago, we determined >> what versions would make sense, which included MSVC

> On Behalf Of Nicholas Chapman > > On 04/12/2012 06:29, Michael Spencer wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Gordon Keiser <gkeiser at arxan.com> > wrote: > >> As an update to this: > >> http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/769222/cl- > >> exe-ice-when-building-llvm-trunk-at-o2 > >> > >> Microsoft

> -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Boucher [mailto:tboucher@abio.com] > Sent: Friday, October 08, 1999 10:57 AM > To: 'samba@samba.org' > Subject: FW: Microsoft Visual Dev Studio > > > > > > Well hello there all, > > > > Thank you all for Samba ! With out it our development > > environment would be much harder to manage.

I just wonder that Visual Studio .NET 2003 is the most compatible one among various MS Visual Studio versions for LLVM. Thank you Seung Jae Lee

It is, if only because it's the version I use, but 2005 is supposed to work also. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it doesn't due to recent STL issues. Versions prior to 2003 won't work. Seung Jae Lee wrote: > I just wonder that Visual Studio .NET 2003 is the most compatible one among various MS Visual Studio versions for LLVM. > > Thank you >

On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 23:40 +0100, Andreas Fredriksson wrote: > On 3/10/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > > It is, if only because it's the version I use, but 2005 is supposed to > > work also. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it > > doesn't due to recent STL issues. Versions prior to 2003 won't work. > >

No, the problem with StoreSDNode was that an argument as being called Value, which hid the class Value later on in the argument list. This also broke 2003 and was fixed a while ago. _WIN32_WINNT is not supposed to be predefined, so that warning shouldn't be occurring. I have never seen it myself, and a predefined value could be inappropriate. Most of the other changes seem to be about

On 3/12/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > Just to make clear, there are no problems building 1.9 with VS 2003, nor > are there any problems as I write this. I'm fairly sure we grabbed the 1.9 tarball off the website, but I could be wrong. > That's what we do. We define it in llvm/lib/System/Win32/Win32.h, which > in included by every file that uses the

Can Microsoft Visual Studio be a good tool for making a backend for an architecture? Thanks, Seung ---- Original message ---- >Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:44:48 -0700 >From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >Andreas Fredriksson wrote: >>

Richard Smith wrote: > I am working on a port of LLVM targeting a proprietary VM. Thus far > development has been under Linux and Cygwin. Cygwin licensing would appear > to require that LLVM built under Cygwin would have to be released under the > GPL, so alternatives are being investigated. > > Using MS Visual Studio and following the instructions at >

On 9/20/07, Richard Smith <richard.smith at antixlabs.com> wrote: > Many thanks. Yes, this question has slightly sidetracked on the license > issue, which was mostly an aside as to why we wish to use something other > than Cygwin. > I totally understand. :-) I just wanted to bring it back on a technical track. > On the make issue, I am very interested to know what it is

Hi. I am interested in using the CBackend of LLVM. I have read about the problems with the current version and that David Greene has started a reimplementation. Can you tell me about its current state? Furthermore, I use Microsoft Visual Studio. The "Getting started with MVC" documents for release 2.8 say "To emphasize, there is no C/C++ front end currently available" but

Andreas Fredriksson wrote: > On 3/11/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: >> No, the problem with StoreSDNode was that an argument as being called >> Value, >> which hid the class Value later on in the argument list. This also >> broke >> 2003 and was fixed a while ago. > > Ok, I didn't know that. We've been using the 1.9 tarball

Hi Richard, > Unfortunately, I believe the issue is not that Cygwin contains GPL code, it > is that applications which it compiles do. This is explicitly stated at > http://cygwin.com/licensing.html: > If you have serious questions about the licensing of Cygwin/LLVM, you really need to talk to a lawyer. No one on this list can give you advice in that area which will accurately reflect

On 04/12/2012 06:29, Michael Spencer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Gordon Keiser <gkeiser at arxan.com> wrote: >> As an update to this: >> http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/769222/cl-exe-ice-when-building-llvm-trunk-at-o2 >> >> Microsoft has reproduced the ICE, given a workaround, and is planning a fix for a future MSVC release.