Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] llvm 3.2 regression"
2012 Dec 20
2
[LLVMdev] llvm 3.2 regression
There seems to be a new regression in current llvm/compiler-rt 3.2 branch.
On 86_64-apple-darwin12, I am seeing the failure...
[100%] Running all regression tests
lit.py: lit.common.cfg:19: note: using clang: '/sw/src/fink.build/llvm32-3.2-0/llvm-3.2/build/bin/clang'
lit.py: lit.cfg:171: note: using clang: '/sw/src/fink.build/llvm32-3.2-0/llvm-3.2/build/bin/./clang'
FAIL:
2012 Dec 20
2
[LLVMdev] llvm 3.2 regression
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:35:47PM +0400, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
> > Can this be fixed before the 3.2 release?
> Given that release is tomorrow, then - no, unfortunately.
Well if you can't fix the bug by tomorrow, can't you at least revert the
failing part of...
2012 Dec 21
0
[LLVMdev] llvm 3.2 regression
+glider
Weird, we haven't seen problems with this test for quite a while.
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu>wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:35:47PM +0400, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
> > > Can this be fixed before the 3.2 release?
> > Given that release is tomorrow, then - no, unfortunately.
>
> Well if you can't
2012 Dec 21
1
[LLVMdev] llvm 3.2 regression
Neither we have them now.
Unfortunately disabling the test in the 3.2 branch won't fix the
problem, and the actual fix may require cherry-picking a number of
recent CLs, which may be rather intrusive.
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote:
> +glider
>
> Weird, we haven't seen problems with this test for quite a while.
>
>
2012 Dec 20
0
[LLVMdev] llvm 3.2 regression
> Can this be fixed before the 3.2 release?
Given that release is tomorrow, then - no, unfortunately.
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University