similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm 3.2 regression

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] llvm 3.2 regression"

2012 Dec 20
2
[LLVMdev] llvm 3.2 regression
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:35:47PM +0400, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > > Can this be fixed before the 3.2 release? > Given that release is tomorrow, then - no, unfortunately. Well if you can't fix the bug by tomorrow, can't you at least revert the failing part of...
2012 Dec 21
0
[LLVMdev] llvm 3.2 regression
+glider Weird, we haven't seen problems with this test for quite a while. On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu>wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:35:47PM +0400, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > > > Can this be fixed before the 3.2 release? > > Given that release is tomorrow, then - no, unfortunately. > > Well if you can't
2012 Dec 21
1
[LLVMdev] llvm 3.2 regression
Neither we have them now. Unfortunately disabling the test in the 3.2 branch won't fix the problem, and the actual fix may require cherry-picking a number of recent CLs, which may be rather intrusive. On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote: > +glider > > Weird, we haven't seen problems with this test for quite a while. > >
2012 Dec 20
0
[LLVMdev] llvm 3.2 regression
> Can this be fixed before the 3.2 release? Given that release is tomorrow, then - no, unfortunately. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
2012 Dec 23
0
[LLVMdev] llvm 3.2 regression
Jack, > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 05:58:59PM +0400, Alexander Potapenko wrote: >> Neither we have them now. > > Alexander, > Do you mean to say that you can't reproduce this failure locally on x86_64 darwin? > I am testing with current llvm 3.2 branches for llvm/compiler-rt/clang/polly/testsuite > against Xcode 4.5.2 on x86_64-apple-darwin12 using a cmake build
2013 Jan 04
0
[LLVMdev] Help with linking llvm 3.2 into an .so
Hi everyone, sorry to bother you guys. I’m moving a linux application that uses LLVM from version 3.0 to 3.2, and I’m getting a relocation error that I didn’t used to get with the older version of LLVM. I believe that I correctly turned on fPIC, but I’m getting this warning anyway: /usr/bin/ld: /scratch/thirdparty/default/lib/libLLVMBitReader.a(BitcodeReader.o): relocation R_X86_64_PC32
2013 Jan 04
0
[LLVMdev] Help with linking llvm 3.2 into an .so
Please ignore, I think this is an issue with an older version of binutils. ________________________________ From: Damien D Neff Sent: 1/4/2013 1:25 PM To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Help with linking llvm 3.2 into an .so Hi everyone, sorry to bother you guys. I’m moving a linux application that uses LLVM from version 3.0 to 3.2, and I’m getting a relocation error that I didn’t used to get
2012 Nov 06
0
[LLVMdev] undefined symbols in AddressSanitizer tests on darwin
The fix is under review. --kcc On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu>wrote: > At 167457 on x86_64-apple-darwin12, I am seeing a slew of > AddressSanitizer failures due to > unresolved symbols such as... > > Exit Code: 1 > Command Output (stderr): > -- > Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: > "___asan_init",
2012 Nov 06
1
[LLVMdev] undefined symbols in AddressSanitizer tests on darwin
Fix is in (r167460). On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > The fix is under review. > > --kcc > > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu>wrote: > >> At 167457 on x86_64-apple-darwin12, I am seeing a slew of >> AddressSanitizer failures due to >> unresolved symbols
2012 Nov 06
2
[LLVMdev] undefined symbols in AddressSanitizer tests on darwin
At 167457 on x86_64-apple-darwin12, I am seeing a slew of AddressSanitizer failures due to unresolved symbols such as... Exit Code: 1 Command Output (stderr): -- Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: "___asan_init", referenced from: _asan.module_ctor in shared-lib-test-so-moBSTe.o "___asan_register_globals", referenced from: _asan.module_ctor in
2012 Oct 23
2
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:03:15PM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote: > > On Oct 23, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Nick, > > Can I do this without access to a debug version of dyld? Using the copy of LLVMPolly.so with isl/cloog-isl/gmp statically linked, > > I find that if I set the breakpoint to the address of the initializer... > > > > dyld: calling
2012 Oct 24
0
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
On Oct 23, 2012, at 4:46 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:03:15PM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote: >> >> On Oct 23, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> Nick, >>> Can I do this without access to a debug version of dyld? Using the copy of LLVMPolly.so with isl/cloog-isl/gmp statically linked, >>> I find that if I set the breakpoint to
2012 Nov 02
1
[LLVMdev] linker warnings in Linking CXX executable Debug/AsanTest
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 06:45:07PM +0400, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > Hi, Jack! > > > I'll take a look at this. However, tests below fail for a different reason > (they don't use Debug/AsanTest at all). > How do you configure a CMake build tree? Can you somehow get (or run > manually) the script which is used > for running log-path_test.cc and other failing test
2012 Oct 31
3
[LLVMdev] piping into lli broken on darwin
While testing llvm/polly svn on x86_64-apple-darwin10/11/12, I noticed that three darwin specific polly-test regressions exist. At least part of these failures appear to be due to lli on darwin not accepting piped input such that the test... opt -load /sw/src/fink.build/llvm32-3.2-0/llvm-3.2/build/lib/LLVMPolly.so -basicaa -polly-prepare -polly-region-simplify -O3
2012 Oct 31
0
[LLVMdev] piping into lli broken on darwin
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > While testing llvm/polly svn on x86_64-apple-darwin10/11/12, I noticed that three darwin > specific polly-test regressions exist. At least part of these failures appear to be due > to lli on darwin not accepting piped input such that the test... > > opt -load
2012 Oct 31
0
[LLVMdev] piping into lli broken on darwin
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:53:50PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: >> > While testing llvm/polly svn on x86_64-apple-darwin10/11/12, I noticed that three darwin >> > specific polly-test
2012 Oct 31
2
[LLVMdev] piping into lli broken on darwin
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:53:50PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > > While testing llvm/polly svn on x86_64-apple-darwin10/11/12, I noticed that three darwin > > specific polly-test regressions exist. At least part of these failures appear to be due > > to lli on darwin not accepting
2016 Feb 25
2
asan link failure when configuring with -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON
I'm getting this link failure when running ninja check on Linux. I'm configuring with shared libraries enabled, so I'm not sure why asan is looking for .a archives. $ cmake -G Ninja -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -DLLVM_BUILD_TESTS=ON -DCLANG_INCLUDE_DOCS=ON -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON ../llvm $ ninja check-all FAILED: cd [..]bld/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/tests &&
2012 Oct 23
2
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:05:04PM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote: > On Oct 23, 2012, at 12:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:40:32AM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote: > >> > >> On Oct 22, 2012, at 11:34 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > >> > >>> Nick, > >>> I have uploaded the full walk with 'set env
2012 Nov 01
0
[LLVMdev] piping into lli broken on darwin
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:43:42PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: >> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:53:50PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Jack Howarth