similar to: [LLVMdev] GetElementPtrConstantExpr

Alessio Giovanni Baroni <alessiogiovanni.baroni at gmail.com> writes: > I need the class in object, but the file ConstantsContext,h isn't installed. > > What can I do? Copy that header under include? It's an installation bug? That's an internal header, not part of the public API. Why do you need the classes declared on that header?

Because I need to convert an [4 x i8] type to i8* in the instantiation of a GlobalVariable. I have the follow declaration: %xxx = type { i8* } and I must emit the following variable: @yyy = linkonce_odr constant %xxx { [4 x i8] c"hello\00" }, but it's wrong. How do I do? 2012/12/18 Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> > Alessio Giovanni Baroni <alessiogiovanni.baroni at

Ok, now it's arising another problem. IR code that I obtain is the following: i8* bitcast ([5 x i8] c"hello\00" to i8*) generated from instructions: ConstantExpr::getBitCast (ConstantDataArray::getString (getGlobalContext (), "hello"), PointerType::get (Type::getInt8Ty (getGlobalContext ()), 0)) but the LLC tool says: invalid cast opcode for cast from '[5 x i8]'

On 19/12/12 10:25, Alessio Giovanni Baroni wrote: > Ok, now it's arising another problem. IR code that I obtain is the following: > > i8* bitcast ([5 x i8] c"hello\00" to i8*) You need to put your "hello" in a (constant) global variable. You can then bitcast the address of the global to i8*. I suggest you compile some C code that makes use of the address of a

Alessio Giovanni Baroni <alessiogiovanni.baroni at gmail.com> writes: > Because I need to convert an [4 x i8] type to i8* in the instantiation of a > GlobalVariable. > I have the follow declaration: %xxx = type { i8* } and I must emit the > following variable: > @yyy = linkonce_odr constant %xxx { [4 x i8] c"hello\00" }, but it's wrong. > > How do I do?

Here there is the dump: SelectionDAG.cpp:81: static bool llvm::ConstantFPSDNode::isValueValidForType(llvm::EVT, const llvm::APFloat &): Assertion `VT.isFloatingPoint() && "Can only convert between FP types"' failed. 0 libLLVMSupport.so 0x00007f7405022de5 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(_IO_FILE*) + 37 1 libLLVMSupport.so 0x00007f74050232e3 2 libpthread.so.0

Hi, I’m on Mac OS X 10.9.2 with all last updates; if I have this source: class xxx explicit { }; int main (int argc, char **argv) { return 0; } and I compile it with clang++ -std=c++11 -Wall -pedantic -c I obtain this error: nn:1: error: expected unqualified-id { ^ 1 error generated. But the C++ 11 standard permits explicit on classes. It’s a bug? -------------- next part

Hi, if I write the following simple program: target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" define void @foo () { %1 = alloca half store half 0xH42CC, half* %1 ; 0xH42CC = 3.4 %2 = load half* %1

Hi all, I just come across an IR instruction like this: %0 = getelementptr i32* getelementptr inbounds ([42 x i32]* @aaa, i32 0, i32 0), i32 %2 What does the part "i32* getelementptr inbounds ([42 x i32]* @aaa, i32 0, i32 0)" mean? As far as I could understand this is a GetElementPtrConstantExpr, isn't it? My question is: how can I instantiate a class that represents that

Make sure you’re running LLVM with assertions enabled. You’ll get more information about what’s going wrong that way. That said, yes, this looks like a bug. Specifically, SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandConstantFP() assumes that f32 is the smallest floating point constant type it’ll need to handle, and that MVT enum ordering reflects that. while (SVT != MVT::f32) {

Hi to all, when I download the clang/llvm officila binaries, I found the libc++ headers under lib directory, but I didn't found libc++.so. Why you ship libc++ headers but no shared library? Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131212/36204500/attachment.html>

Just ran into this as well. Did you ever open a a bug report about it? On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:43 AM, Alessio Giovanni Baroni < alessiogiovanni.baroni at gmail.com> wrote: > Here there is the dump: > > SelectionDAG.cpp:81: static bool > llvm::ConstantFPSDNode::isValueValidForType(llvm::EVT, const llvm::APFloat > &): Assertion `VT.isFloatingPoint() && "Can

I don't. 2013/6/29 Keno Fischer <kfischer at college.harvard.edu> > Just ran into this as well. Did you ever open a a bug report about it? > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:43 AM, Alessio Giovanni Baroni < > alessiogiovanni.baroni at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Here there is the dump: >> >> SelectionDAG.cpp:81: static bool >>

Hi, Consider ConstantUniqueMap::getOrCreate() (in lib/VMCore/ConstantsContext.h): /// getOrCreate - Return the specified constant from the map, creating it if /// necessary. ConstantClass *getOrCreate(const TypeClass *Ty, ValRefType V) { MapKey Lookup(Ty, V); ConstantClass* Result = 0; ... For array (or struct or vector) constants, typically: ValType = vector<Constant*>

Hi During a pass, the XCore target lowers thread local global variables by turning them into global variable arrays indexed by the (max 8) thread ID. (see XCoreLowerThreadLocal.cpp) This works fine for instructions e.g. GetElementPtrInst But can't be done for constants e.g. GetElementPtrConstantExpr Thus I would like to replace GetElementPtrConstantExpr with GetElementPtrInst when it is

Hi LLVMdev members I found something strange in ConstantExpr::replaceUsesOfWithOnConstant() function. in lib/VMCore/Constants.cpp file 2118 if (getOpcode() == Instruction::GetElementPtr) { 2119 SmallVector<Constant*, 8> Indices; 2120 Constant *Pointer = getOperand(0); 2121 Indices.reserve(getNumOperands()-1); 2122 if (Pointer == From) Pointer = To; 2123 2124 for

Hi to all. Using Samba 3.0.22 on 2 identical systems (SLES 10). On the first system, Samba logs correctly AD domain name and user in the form DOMAIN+username in access.log. On the second one, it logs only the username, stripping away the domain name. The only difference is that the first system is part of a network with a w2003 server acting as a domain controller, while the second machine talks

On Jan 16, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Talin wrote: > OK here's the patch for real this time :) > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > Here's a work in progress of the union patch. Note that the test > "union.ll" does not work, so you probably don't want to check this > in as is. However, I'd be interested in any

OK here's a new version of the patch - and the unions.ll test actually passes :) On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Talin wrote: > > OK here's the patch for real this time :) >> >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: >> Here's a work

I've made all the suggested changes - however, I'm having a bit of problem running the tests. I started "make check" and several hours later it had only made it through about 1/3 of the tests. I'm not sure what the deal is. On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Talin wrote: > > OK