Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] [polly] ISL vector code generation"
2017 Jun 22
2
Legal names for Functions and other Identifiers
Thank You Chen !
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 5:21 PM 陳韋任 <chenwj.cs97g at g2.nctu.edu.tw> wrote:
> Perhaps you can refer to [1]. Function name should be a global one.
>
> [1] http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#identifiers
>
> HTH,
> chenwj
>
>
> 2017-06-22 16:35 GMT+08:00 SANJAY SRIVALLABH SINGAPURAM via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>:
>
>>
2017 Mar 12
2
What does it mean by a "DICompileUnit missing from llvm.dgs.cu" ? | Where is the error ?
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017, at 07:34 PM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 3:10 AM SANJAY SRIVALLABH SINGAPURAM via llvm-dev
> <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > One of my Julia programs failed to execute with the following error,
> > DICompileUnit not listed in llvm.dbg.cu
> > !11 = distinct
2017 Jun 22
2
Legal names for Functions and other Identifiers
Thanks for the heads up Philip !
I did come across a strange case where LLVM allowed "%" to be a part of a
function's name. This was in the context of my patch
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33985, where I prefix the name of the source
function and the Scop ( A special kind of Region that Polly can optimize,
the name of the Scop is the name of the Region ) to the name of the PTX
kernel
2011 Oct 27
2
[LLVMdev] How to make Polly ignore some non-affine memory accesses
Perfect, thank you very much :)
2011/10/26 Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es>:
> On 10/24/2011 11:32 PM, Marcello Maggioni wrote:
>>
>> Strange , with --enable-shared (I use auto tool by the way ...) it gives:
>>
>> MacBook-Pro-di-Marcello:examples Kariddi$ ./compile_ex.sh
>> not_so_simple_loop
>> clang (LLVM option parsing): Unknown command line
2013 May 15
2
[LLVMdev] [polly] Polly Loop info and LoopSimplify functionality
Tobias,
I am working on one very well hidden issue with Polly loop structure. Here
is a brief description.
In polly::createLoop() we create something like this (topology is
important):
polly.start: ; preds =
%polly.split_new_and_old
... <some code>
br label %polly.loop_header
polly.loop_after: ; preds =
2011 Nov 01
0
[LLVMdev] How to make Polly ignore some non-affine memory accesses
Mmm, this code seems to kill polly:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main()
{
char *B;
int i,j,k,h;
const int x = 0, y=0;
B = (char *)malloc(sizeof(char)*1024*1024);
for (i = 1; i < 1024; i++)
for (j = 1; j < 1024; j++)
{
if (i+j > 1000)
B[j] = i;
}
printf("Random Value: %d", B[rand() % 1024*1024]);
return 0;
}
running:
opt
2011 Nov 02
5
[LLVMdev] How to make Polly ignore some non-affine memory accesses
Mmm I found out a very strange behavior (to me) of the SCEV analysis
of the loop bound of the external loop I posted.
When in ScopDetection it gets the SCEV of the external loop bound in
the "isValidLoop()" function with:
const SCEV *LoopCount = SE->getBackedgeTakenCount(L);
It returns a SCEVCouldNotCompute, but if I change the "if" block
inside the loop from:
if