similar to: [LLVMdev] Query Regarding instruction ordering of passive nodes

Hello. I generated in the back end by hand (in C++ code, not with TableGen) some fancy assembly code using Inline ASM expressions and if I use 2 functions in my source code (but NOT just 1 function; I will not present the functions, but each requires me to generate an Inline ASM expression) I get this error at compilation (at scheduling): BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry

I just added a new type of MachineOperand to the code generator: MO_RegisterMask. Register mask operands are used on machine instructions that clobber large sets of registers, typically calls. Instead of a long list of <imp-def> operands, a call now has a single <regmask> operand that contains a pointer to a bit mask of call-preserved registers. This reduces memory usage and improves

I have another idea: let the BasicBlockSDNode points to the last node in its predecessor blocks. But this will introduce cycles into the selection DAG, making it not a DAG anymore. So what's the impact of a non-DAG on the existing DAG legalizers and combiner? On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Zhongxing Xu <xuzhongxing at gmail.com> wrote: > At first I'll try the simplest

Hi, I'm having an issue with the below modules. I build module X, then module Y (which has a dependency on X). I've added an external declaration on module Y of the functions defined in X. i also link the except-handling module, but i think it is peripheral to the issue i like all the modules together in a single module called executableModule. I link them with the method:

I'm getting a weird error when I try to sFTP on a CentOS box (which I don't have root access). when I run: sftp -oPort=990 user at host.domain.com I get the following error, which I suspect is a result of not being in "passive mode" (which works when I use Filezilla on Windows) Connecting to host.domain.com ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host

Grant Taylor wrote: > I''ll have to double check some things to make sure that you don''t need > to do any thing special other than just allow the initial connection and > rely on the FTP connection tracking helper to handle all other connections. > > I''ve never run an FTP server behind a NAT, but I''ve never had a problem > with the FTP

I am trying to control traffic in my server and a doubt came over me... My ftp server is set up in passive mode, so it will randomly choose a port to transfer data (in my case ports 50000-50100)... Is there a way of controlling this ftp traffic without marking packets? Thanks! Bye... msn: fredi_bieging@hotmail.com skype: fredibieging A mathematician is a machine for converting coffee into

Hi, I just wanted to share my script with the list. I have been trying to shape outbound passive and active ftp traffic without affecting inbound and lan transfers. I have tried to do this for a long time and it seems that I have finally figured it out. Feel free to comment on the below script if there is anything that can be improved. It seems to work flawlessly so far. #!/bin/bash

Hi, I am trying to use the following script to limit my passive ftp traffic to 35KBytes. Problem is, it kill''s the entire connection on that computer. The script is running on the same machine as the ftp server. I was hoping to limit the ftp traffic, and only the ftp traffic, leaving the computer. It seems to limit everything, i tried transfering a file with samba and the whole

I am trying to mark outbound passive ftp traffic with iptables and shape it to 35KBytes. I am using the following script on the computer that runs the ftp server. It is not working correctly, it seems to limit ALL traffic. Cant file share or anything. Anyone might know what is wrong? #!/bin/bash #shaping passive ftp traffic # mark the outbound passive ftp packets on ports 50000-51000

Hi, I''m using the same set of firewall rules of 2.0.x (sorry, I can''t remember the exact minor version) and put it to work with 2.0.9. And now I can''t do passive ftp (was working before). I see that my NEWNOTSYN is set to Yes, and the loc->net rule is blocking 1024:65535. But I believe with the ip_conntrack_ftp, the passive mode would be allowed, since

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Remember my thread that I can''t FTP into my server? It seems that (well, what Tom has suggested) ip_conntrack_ftp and ip_nat_ftp weren''t loaded. I don''t know why in that particular machine mdk9.2 doesn''t load them by default, whereas in other machine they were loaded. I have put them in /etc/modules, and

Hello, everyone Here part of my dialplan context [globals] CMD_NOOP=0 CMD_DOSTUFF1=1 CMD_DOSTUFF2=2 CMD_DOSTUFF3=2 [blah-context] same => n,Set(COMMAND=${CMD_NOOP}) same => n,UserEvent(blah-event,CHANNEL:${CHANNEL(name)} same => n(COMMAND_SWITCH),GoToIf($["${COMMAND}"="${CMD_DOSTUFF1}"]?LBL_DO_STUFF1) same =>

Hello, I''m observing a weird bug with ip_nat_ftp in a somewhat more complicated constellation. It''s possible that XEN is also involved in this, but I''m not sure. What I''m trying to do is have XEN guest domains on a host, connected via a bridge into a private network. The the privileged domain attaches to this private network and acts as a NAT router to connect

Hi all, there''s an interesting citaton on kerneltrap.org, mentioning the addition of passive OS fingerprinting to the OpenBSD firewall (http://www.kerneltrap.org/node/view/770 for those interested) This new feature enables the possibility of triggering customized firewall rules according to the (detected) incoming OS, in a fully passive way. I was wondering if the above would be

Ok, from what I can see _NO_ passive ISDN cards will work with Asterisk on freebsd, is this correct & is it likely to change soon? Secondly, if this is likely to be the way for a while, what is the lease expensive card that will work with FreeBSD? Also, can I use DID (Direct Inward Dialling) on FreeBSD? Thanks for all your help to date. Regards, Cian Hughes

Author: bw Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 8256e1e381a84873d93d900e1d0735c57208e91b Log message: 6331032 in.routed deletes aggregated passive routes through remote gateways Files: update: usr/src/cmd/cmd-inet/usr.sbin/in.routed/table.c

See below... ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] xenoprof passive profiling and "mode" setting Date: Wednesday 05 July 2006 21:53 From: "Yang, Xiaowei" <xiaowei.yang@intel.com> To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>, "Ray Bryant" <raybry@mpdtxmail.amd.com> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

Hi all, I am trying to do Xen / Kernel profiling. So I tried passive domain profile with oprofile tool in Dom0 as below. * Environment 1 + i7-2600 CPU + XCP 1.6 Base ISO + CentOS 6.3 Guest (HVM,PV) * Environment 2 + i7-2600 CPU + Xen hypervisor 4.2.1 + Konrad''s passive domain profiling patch applied Dom0 Kernel ( 2.6.32 jeremy branch & 3.2.44 mainline kernel) + CentOS 6.3

Hi all, I have a question about multiple imputation within the MICE package. I want to use passive imputation for my variable called X, because it is calculated out of multiple variables, namely Y, Z. Let's give an example with BMI. I know, that if I want to use passive imputation for BMI, I can use the following command: meth["BMI"] <- "~I(weight/(height/100)^2)"