similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm.org down

Hiya. I'm trying to get the static analyzer, but it looks like llvm.org is down: http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/llvm.org Can somebody tell me if it's supposed to be down or not? Where to go if it's moved, etc. Thank you, -Russell -- View this message in context: http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/llvm-org-is-down-tp53092.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive

Hi guys, Is there any problem with www.centos.org? It seems down for me, was trying since last two weeks. -- Syam G Krishnan GPG 4096R/FBB26E60 Red Hat India Pvt Ltd

I think you're looking for an inter-procedural post dominator analysis. I don't think there is one in LLVM already, but it should be relatively straightforward. This gives a sound approximation (i.e. no false positives) of something sort-of equivalent to the halting problem: if the program terminates, then block Y was executed. Cheers, Scott On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Jim Grosbach

Hello, I have a simple program using aliases to functions, and it seems that the CallGraph doesn't follow these aliases. Here is the example: @alias = alias void ()* @realfunc define void @realfunc() { entry: ret void } define i32 @main() { entry: call void @alias() ret i32 0 } ******* Output of the CallGraph ******* Call graph node <<null

Is there any inter-procedural analysis that could tell me if some BasicBlock Y is guaranteed to execute based on my knowledge that BasicBlock X will execute? For example: extern int x; void foo() { } int main() { if (x) { foo(); } else { foo(); } } I want to be told that the entry block of foo is guaranteed to be

Okay thanks for the info. The term program termination was probably a poor choice of words. I'm really just trying to build an inter-procedural BasicBlock graph, and then look for postdominance as Scott suggested. I'll go about making my own since it doesn't sound like there is one out there already. Thanks, -Stephen On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Scott Moore <sdmoore at

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Stephen Schiffli <sschiffli at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, I have a simple program using aliases to functions, and it seems that > the CallGraph doesn't follow these aliases. Here is the example: > > @alias = alias void ()* @realfunc > > define void @realfunc() { > entry: > ret void > } > > define i32 @main() { >

What can I do to UNDERSTAND why, periodically, I can't reach www.centos.org (but everyone else can)? Every few months, http://www.centos.org just drops off for me and for me only. It's not the web site, because I can reach it via a proxy (e.g., TOR browser bundle) and other tests show it to be alive (e.g., http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/centos.org or

Isn't this effectively the halting problem? Consider the case where block Y is the exit block of main() and block X is the entry block of main(). Jim On Oct 2, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Stephen Schiffli <sschiffli at gmail.com> wrote: > Is there any inter-procedural analysis that could tell me if some BasicBlock Y is guaranteed to execute based on my knowledge that BasicBlock X will

On 11/16/2016 03:44 AM, Syam G Krishnan wrote: > Hi guys, > > Is there any problem with www.centos.org? > It seems down for me, was trying since last two weeks. >> an easy place to check; http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/ -- peace out. tc,hago. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.8 KDE 4.3.4 g . =+= Tired of having your microsoft os hacked? Change to Linux os, used by microsoft

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

I'm having trouble accessing the website... is it currently down? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120630/da0d8dbd/attachment.html>

Hello, I am trying to compile some code to LLVM IR with a simple "__thread int x" but hitting this error: test.cpp:1:1: error: thread-local storage is unsupported for the current target I'm using both the -S and -emit-llvm options on clang, and was expecting to see "@x = thread_local global i32 0" come out of clang. I am curious why clang even cares about this since

Hello all, I was playing with the demo and found that I couldn't use any c++11: warning: 'noexcept' is a keyword in C++11 [-Wc++11-compat] I was wondering if the demo will be updated to LLVM/Clang 3.2 once that finishes, and if it would be possible to enable c++11 support. Thanks, -Stephen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I have always been able to browse, without any problems, http://www.mobile-review.com/index-en.shtml but for the past 2 or 3 days, Mozilla Firefox just hangs "connecting to ...." How can I tell if they have started blocking IP addresses from Colombia? I would like to do that, before I post to the IPCop mailing list. I have my IPCop box set up to do DNS Caching, so possibly something

Dear LLVM Developers/Users, We will be performing some upgrades on llvm.org on Monday, June 24. The upgrades are scheduled to begin around 11:00 am Central Time and should take 3-4 hours. During most of this time, llvm.org services (LLVM web page, CVS repository, etc) will either be slow or unavailable. The machine will also be undergoing an IP address change due to some recent network

Anybody knows why is down? Or if has been moved to another page?? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090321/f8c5e101/attachment.htm

Hello, is http://xi.rename-it.nl down? Apticron shows me permanently errors. -- Mit freundlichen Gr??en, with kind regards, Jim Knuth --------- Wenn ein wirklich gro?er Geist in der Welt erscheint, kann man ihn untr?glich daran erkennen, da? sich alle Dummk?pfe gegen ihn verb?nden. (Jonathan Swift)

Hi Folks, I've looked around, haven't found anything, and I'm not sure where else to check. I haven't visited R-forge (http://r-forge.r-project.org) in a long time. Now that I'm trying, it seems to be down. Anyone know if this is a temporary condition, and if so, when it's expected to rise again? Thanks, Allie

Evan Cheng wrote: > Any idea when it would be back up? We are in release crunch mode here. > Not having access to the CVS server is a bit inconvenient. :-) Indeed. I've fixed a minor problem with the OS upgrade, and CVS services seem to be working again. You should be able to checkout and make commits (provided you have commit access, of course) using the LLVM CVS repositories.