similar to: [LLVMdev] Packaging reST documentation

Hi Eric, On 20 July 2015 at 10:41, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm working on rewriting libc++'s documentation using Sphinx. > Hopefully it will be easier to write and maintain documentation using > restructured text and not HTML. > > What steps do I need to take to get libc++ a Sphinx builder and get > the required changes made for

On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On 20 July 2015 at 10:41, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm working on rewriting libc++'s documentation using Sphinx. >> Hopefully it will be easier to write and maintain documentation using >> restructured text and not HTML.

Hello, Why do we have letter-spacing: -0.01em in the CSS generated by Sphinx? Could we remove that? It makes the main text font look really bad for me (I can attach an image if anyone wishes to take a look). Fonts already have appropriate tracking built-in, so trying to change that, especially without knowing the font name beforehand, is shooting oneself into the foot. Dmitri --

Looking through the history with git, it looks like it was just grandfathered in from the original template that the current template is based off of. I don't think that it is going to hurt to remove it. Also, another problem with the current CSS is that some of the different heading types (IIRC in particular <h2> and <h3>) are very difficult to distinguish, which makes some

On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > Looking through the history with git, it looks like it was just > grandfathered in from the original template that the current template > is based off of. I don't think that it is going to hurt to remove it. > > Also, another problem with the current CSS is that some of the > different heading

Hi All, I'm working on rewriting libc++'s documentation using Sphinx. Hopefully it will be easier to write and maintain documentation using restructured text and not HTML. What steps do I need to take to get libc++ a Sphinx builder and get the required changes made for libcxx.llvm.org? /Eric

It wouldn't take me more than an hour or two to do the format conversion. It is rather trivial, actually. Just say the word and I'm on to it like a starving bee. I guess I should get used to using the Sphinx layout; I'm simply more familiar with the format I use on my own websites. Have you guys ever considered making a less formal wiki for LLVM documentation - a place where tiny

Hi Dmitri, Sorry it's taken so long for me to take a look at this. I've finally found some free time to look at this :) I've got created a factory for building Sphinx documentation on my local machine and that's mostly working so I plan to submit a patch soon. Can I check a few things with you? - Is it still okay to use 'gribozavr4' as the build slave? - The factory

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org>wrote: > >> It wouldn't take me more than an hour or two to do the format conversion. >> It is rather trivial, actually. Just say the word and I'm on to it like a >> starving bee. I

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > StackOverflows says two things: > > 1. An example is: <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url= > http://example.com/" />. > 2. This apparently discouraged by the WWW Consortium who recommends > server redirects. > > It seems that LLVM.org is served by

Hi, Thanks for bringing this up. I am reluctant to update to recommonmark >= 0.4.0, because it is not available in any Ubuntu version, Debian Testing or even Debian Unstable. While we could do something custom on the buildbot, I think it would be a disservice for our users to use a library that is not packaged in modern operating systems yet. Dmitri

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > It wouldn't take me more than an hour or two to do the format conversion. > It is rather trivial, actually. Just say the word and I'm on to it like a > starving bee. I guess I should get used to using the Sphinx layout; I'm > simply more familiar with the format I use on my own

StackOverflows says two things: 1. An example is: <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url= http://example.com/" />. 2. This apparently discouraged by the WWW Consortium who recommends server redirects. It seems that LLVM.org is served by Apache 2.2.22 running on Ubuntu. In that case, the .htaccess file should make it possible to do server redirects:

Sean and Michael, Thank you for looking at this. I removed letter-spacing in r164921. The h2/h3 issue could be resolved by making the h2 font slightly bigger. Or we could try to copy Wikipedia's approach by using different formatting for different levels (for example, we could remove the background rectangle from h3 and lower, but instead make them bold). Dmitri --

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >>>

Hello, JFYI so that no work will be duplicated. My colleagues and I will take care of converting the rest of the documentation to rst. Dmitri -- main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov <eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >>>>

Hi, I've been spending a bit of time fixing up building and installation of the Doxygen and Sphinx documentation for CMake. There are more fixes in the pipeline (none for autconf/make system, I'm not interested in fixing that) but I started wondering if any testing was done to check that documentation builds correctly for LLVM and its various subprojects. I'm not particularly

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Dmitry Mikushin <dmitry at kernelgen.org> wrote: > Hi Anton, > > I think it would be worth to remove this signature in the bottom line: > > Last modified: $Date: 2009/12/16 09:03:23 $ > > Otherwise, new people may think this page is long time abandoned :) It indicates that it *is* long-abandoned! We need to start actively adding to it.

Note that as far as places to put temporary files, the right place to put them is alongside the other test outputs in the test output "sandbox" directory. Somewhat orthogonal, but we should also fix up lit to purge those sandboxes before it starts a new test run. - Daniel On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013