similar to: [LLVMdev] dragonegg now requires clang

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] dragonegg now requires clang"

2012 Dec 07
2
[LLVMdev] dragonegg now requires clang
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 06:20:37PM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jack, this occurs because you compiled LLVM with clang (right?) and > dragonegg is compiled with the same flags used to compile LLVM (it is > an llvm-config bug in my opinion that llvm-config output includes these > kinds of optional flags). Duncan, Yes. I believe both fink and MacPorts now default to the clang
2012 Dec 07
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg now requires clang
Hi Jack, this occurs because you compiled LLVM with clang (right?) and dragonegg is compiled with the same flags used to compile LLVM (it is an llvm-config bug in my opinion that llvm-config output includes these kinds of optional flags). Ciao, Duncan. On 07/12/12 18:11, Jack Howarth wrote: > Duncan, > I am unable to complile dragonegg 3.2 with FSF gcc 4.7 due the the > compiler
2012 Dec 07
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg now requires clang
Hi Jack, can you please open a bug report asking that llvm-config only provide the minimum set of flags needed to compile code that interfaces with LLVM, rather than (as now) all kinds of unneeded flags such as -g and warnings. Thanks, Duncan. On 07/12/12 18:55, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 06:20:37PM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: >> Hi Jack, this occurs because you
2012 Dec 09
1
[LLVMdev] dragonegg now requires clang
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 06:57:36PM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jack, can you please open a bug report asking that llvm-config only > provide the minimum set of flags needed to compile code that interfaces > with LLVM, rather than (as now) all kinds of unneeded flags such as -g > and warnings. > > Thanks, Duncan. > Duncan, I have opened
2012 Oct 22
5
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
Jack, I looks like the code is calling dlopen() on LLVMPolly.so and it or something it links against has an initializer. The initialer is run before dlopen() returns and the crash is in the initializer. The message: dyld: fast lazy bind offset out of range (53437, max=7640) in image /sw/lib/gcc4.7/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0/4.7.2/cc1 means the initializer called something which
2014 Sep 11
3
[LLVMdev] patch for DragonEgg 3.3
Hi - attached is a patch to enable building DragonEgg (x86_64) for LLVM3.3 and LLVM3.4. That is, add these changes to the 3.3 release, and it becomes possible to build DragonEgg against a llvm3.4 compiler. Regards, Richard Gorton Cognitive Electronics rcgorton at cog-e.com ---------- -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name:
2012 Oct 23
2
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:03:15PM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote: > > On Oct 23, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Nick, > > Can I do this without access to a debug version of dyld? Using the copy of LLVMPolly.so with isl/cloog-isl/gmp statically linked, > > I find that if I set the breakpoint to the address of the initializer... > > > > dyld: calling
2012 Oct 24
0
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
On Oct 23, 2012, at 4:46 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:03:15PM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote: >> >> On Oct 23, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> Nick, >>> Can I do this without access to a debug version of dyld? Using the copy of LLVMPolly.so with isl/cloog-isl/gmp statically linked, >>> I find that if I set the breakpoint to
2012 Oct 22
5
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
On Oct 22, 2012, at 11:34 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Nick, > I have uploaded the full walk with 'set env DYLD_PRINT_INITIALIZERS'. It didn't seem very informative > as the dyld error occurs right after... > > (gdb) > llvm::sys::DynamicLibrary::getPermanentLibrary (filename=0x142903da8 "/sw/opt/llvm-3.2/lib/LLVMPolly.so", errMsg=0x7fff5fbfe6e0) at
2011 Apr 08
4
[LLVMdev] dragonegg build failure
> Is there anything I can do to make the build more verbose so I can debug this? make VERBOSE=1
2012 Oct 23
2
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:05:04PM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote: > On Oct 23, 2012, at 12:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:40:32AM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote: > >> > >> On Oct 22, 2012, at 11:34 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > >> > >>> Nick, > >>> I have uploaded the full walk with 'set env
2012 Oct 23
0
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
On Oct 23, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Nick, > Can I do this without access to a debug version of dyld? Using the copy of LLVMPolly.so with isl/cloog-isl/gmp statically linked, > I find that if I set the breakpoint to the address of the initializer... > > dyld: calling initializer function 0x100ebb3a0 in /sw/opt/llvm-3.2/lib/LLVMPolly.so > dyld: lazy symbol binding
2012 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
Duncan, Is the documentation for using Polly support in dragonegg correct? I built llvm/polly/dragonegg using the documentation at http://polly.llvm.org/example_load_Polly_into_dragonegg.html with... GCC=/sw/lib/gcc4.7/bin/gcc-4 LLVM_CONFIG=/sw/opt/llvm-3.2/bin/llvm-config ENABLE_LLVM_PLUGINS=1 make CPPFLAGS="-DENABLE_LTO -I/sw/include" The resulting dragonegg plugin works fine
2013 Dec 09
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg 3.4 branch broken
The drgaonegg 3.4 release branch is broken against current llvm/clang/compiler-rt at r196792 with the build failure... Compiling Debug.cpp /sw/opt/llvm-3.4/bin/clang++ -c -I/sw/src/fink.build/dragonegg-gcc48-3.4-0/dragonegg-3.4/include/x86 -I/sw/src/fink.build/dragonegg-gcc48-3.4-0/dragonegg-3.4/include/darwin -g -DENABLE_BUILD_WITH_CXX -DENABLE_LTO -I/sw/include -I/sw/opt/llvm-3.4/include
2012 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>> Duncan, >>>> Is the documentation for using Polly support in dragonegg correct? I built llvm/polly/dragonegg
2012 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> Duncan, >> Is the documentation for using Polly support in dragonegg correct? I built llvm/polly/dragonegg >> using the documentation at http://polly.llvm.org/example_load_Polly_into_dragonegg.html >> with... >> >> GCC=/sw/lib/gcc4.7/bin/gcc-4
2012 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>>>> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
2012 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> Duncan, >>> Is the documentation for using Polly support in dragonegg correct? I built llvm/polly/dragonegg >>> using the documentation at
2012 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Duncan, > Is the documentation for using Polly support in dragonegg correct? I built llvm/polly/dragonegg > using the documentation at http://polly.llvm.org/example_load_Polly_into_dragonegg.html > with... > > GCC=/sw/lib/gcc4.7/bin/gcc-4 LLVM_CONFIG=/sw/opt/llvm-3.2/bin/llvm-config ENABLE_LLVM_PLUGINS=1 make
2012 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>>> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>>> Duncan, >>>>> Is the documentation for using Polly