similar to: [LLVMdev] How to enable cbe as a supported target?

The C Backend was remove in 3.1 (http://llvm.org/releases/3.1/docs/ReleaseNotes.html): "Major Changes and Removed Features ... The C backend has been removed. It had numerous problems, to the point of not being able to compile any nontrivial program." On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Mingliang LIU <liuml07 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I met an error when I run the

I've added the missing magic to Makefile.llvm.rules in r168685. On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Mingliang LIU <liuml07 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I use the following line to configure, which can enable the c++11 in the > project building. However, I don't think it's an elegant way to do the > trick. > $ CXX="clang++ -std=c++11" ../configure

Hi, I'm using the latest LLVM (r168491) built by GCC 4.7.2 (Gentoo masked version). The clang++ runs as expected when I compile a hello program with c++11 enabled. I created a project (copied from sample/) where there are some C++ source files with c++11 features. I configured my project using the following command: $ CXXFLAGS="-std=c++11" ../configure --enable-cxx11 However, I

Hi, I use the following line to configure, which can enable the c++11 in the project building. However, I don't think it's an elegant way to do the trick. $ CXX="clang++ -std=c++11" ../configure I don't know why "-enable-cxx11" doesn't work as expected when I configure the project. Regards. On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Mingliang LIU <liuml07 at

Hi all, I'm doing the program slicing [1] in LLVM. Now I implemented the Weiser's algorithm [2] in a simple way by writing a plugin to analyze the IR. My final goal is to slice the source code, thus I recorded all the lines of source code to be sliced. The last step is to delete the lines which are not in the program slice. However, I met a problem when deleting the source code directly:

Hi all, I need to know the line number range of a function. The start of the function line number can be found by the definition point, which is stored at the subprogram metadata: DISubprogram::getLineNumber(). However, there is no API (or the metadata in the first place) to know the end of the function. I have to visit all the instructions of the function and maintain the *max*line number of

Hi, I suggest add the id attribute for each <h2> tag in www/index.html. Thus we can refer to the "Getting it" section in the dragonegg homepage page (the only web page) by simply the given URL: http://dragonegg.llvm.org#GettingIt Regards. On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Dmitry Mikushin <dmitry at kernelgen.org>wrote: > Hi Tom, > > DragonEgg depends on GCC's

On 4/12/13 4:31 AM, Mingliang LIU wrote: > Hi all, > > I need to know the line number range of a function. The start of the > function line number can be found by the definition point, which is > stored at the subprogram metadata: DISubprogram::getLineNumber(). > > However, there is no API (or the metadata in the first place) to know > the end of the function. > >

Hi, maybe you can have a look at the CReduce project: http://embed.cs.utah.edu/creduce/ This project implements many source-to-source transformations of C programs, e.g. removing functions, changing variable names, deleting branches in if-statements, etc. Some of these are purely based on the source code, other use the Clang frontend. Hope this helps, Jonas On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 7:25 PM,

Hi Mingliang LIU, > I suggest add the id attribute for each <h2> tag in www/index.html. Thus we can > refer to the "Getting it" section in the dragonegg homepage page (the only web > page) by simply the given URL: > http://dragonegg.llvm.org#GettingIt this already works: http://dragonegg.llvm.org/#gettingrelease But maybe could be done better or more consistently?

Hi Arnold, On 06/12/12 08:50, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:05:03AM +0800, Mingliang LIU wrote: >> Hi Arnold, >> >> Thank you. I googled but missed the release notes. >> >> Regards. > > Someone else out there tried to bring cbe back. You can search the ML > archieve and reach them out. > That would be me. > Regards,

Hi, 1. How can I report a bug or commit a patch to the giri progject? I doubt this central commit list is the right place. 2. Are you still maintaining the giri project any more? Thank you. L On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:49 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>wrote: > On 6/26/12 5:07 PM, amruth.rd wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am curious to know if

Dear John, Now, I want to do dynamic analysis by dynamic slicing based on LLVM. I just see that you have implemented dynamic slicing for LLVM. I also check the Giri project, and I don't find the code. I hope I can learn something from your code. I am very appreciated if you can tell me how to get the code or send me one copy. Thank you very much! Pengfei -- View this message in context:

Hi Arnold, Thank you. I googled but missed the release notes. Regards. On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer < arnold.schwaighofer at gmail.com> wrote: > The C Backend was remove in 3.1 > (http://llvm.org/releases/3.1/docs/ReleaseNotes.html): > > "Major Changes and Removed Features > ... > The C backend has been removed. It had numerous problems,

Hi all, This is a GSoC 2013 proposal for LLVM project. Please see the formatted version at here: http://pacman.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn/~liuml07/files/gsoc2013-proposal-program-slicing.pdf Program slicing has been used in many applications, the criteria of which is a pair of statement and variables. I would like to write an inter-procedural program slicing pass in LLVM, which is able to calculate C

On 6/26/12 5:07 PM, amruth.rd wrote: > Hello, > > I am curious to know if LLVM offers any passes to do interprocedural slicing, I need to eliminate most of the computations(possibly all, if they don't influence the control flow), but the control flow of the program should be maintained at all cost. I did see an optimization pass to print the CFG of a function without its body to a

Hello, I am curious to know if LLVM offers any passes to do interprocedural slicing, I need to eliminate most of the computations(possibly all, if they don't influence the control flow), but the control flow of the program should be maintained at all cost. I did see an optimization pass to print the CFG of a function without its body to a dot file, but I am interested in generating the

Hi all, I am experiencing a problem managing the command line option of a set of passes in my LLVM project. Attached you find a toy project the triggers the problem. The project is made up of two passes: "AnalysisPass" and "TransformPass". "TransformPass" requires "AnalysisPass" and they both share a common integer command line option called

On a particular system I am trying to link my application to the LLVM library and it can't find -ltinfo and -lz. The former is part of ncurses (build with term- info). Building ncurses for this system in user space turns out to be not straight-forward (haven't succeeded so far). In LLVM, is there a way to turn the need for -ltinfo and -lz off? Frank

All, I have arranged for an LLVM BoF at SC13 in Denver: http://sc13.supercomputing.org/schedule/event_detail.php?evid=bof143 If you will be at SC13, have an interesting project based on or within LLVM, and would be willing to come to the BoF and spend 10 minutes or so giving an overview of it, please email me. I am trying to get a collection of people together to talk about vectorization and