similar to: [LLVMdev] [RFC] Removal of 'deplibs'?

Please nuke it. It is really old and was never used. If it comes back it should be done with module metadata. -Chris On Nov 26, 2012, at 4:35 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Did you know that there is a 'deplibs' keyword? Neither did I. It looks like it's not really used for much. We don't document it in the Language Reference.

Dears, If you remove this keyword, will you keep the backward compatibility in LLVM 3.x? We use this keyword in our project for checking dependent libraries, and we rely on the promise that bitcode format will keep compatible in LLVM 3.x. In our project, we compile and save bitcodes for later use, but we always try to keep our runtime upstream. Hence, we need readers recognize previous version

Hi, The language reference uses "::" many places where it seems it should be using ".. code-block:: llvm". The result is that Sphinx does not colorize these samples. Should I fix this? Or is it purposeful? Also, anybody but me that has noticed that Sphinx does not always colorize things even if you put the proper ".. code-block:: llvm" in front? If it is a known

On Nov 27, 2012, at 6:23 PM, Jason SH Lin <jasonlin.mtk at gmail.com> wrote: > Dears, > > If you remove this keyword, will you keep the backward compatibility in LLVM 3.x? > > We use this keyword in our project for checking dependent libraries, and we rely on the promise that bitcode format will keep compatible in LLVM 3.x. In our project, we compile and save bitcodes for

On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hi, > > The language reference uses "::" many places where it seems it should be > using ".. code-block:: llvm". The result is that Sphinx does not colorize > these samples. > > Should I fix this? Or is it purposeful? > Could you give an example of what you are

Overhauling Attributes Problem ======= LTO needs a way to pass options through to different parts of the compiler. In particular, we need to pass code generation options to the back-end. The way we want to do this is via the LLVM Attributes class. In order to do that, we need to overhaul the Attributes class. The Attributes class right now isn't very extensible. After considering several

Hello, My goal is to create a language which can compile itself, therefore I feel I need to understand the Assembler/Byte code format. Starting with a C hello world program there are statements at the beginning of the disassembled bc file that I couldn't find any documentation: target endian = little target pointersize = 32 target triple = "i686-pc-linux-gnu"

> On Jan 23, 2020, at 08:37, David Greene via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hubert Tong <hubert.reinterpretcast at gmail.com> writes: > >>> I read this as the refresh being an entirely new GitHub PR. Is that >>> right? Normally I would expect the same PR to be used but the rebase >>> would cause a force-push of the branch

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 4:40 PM David Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: > Hubert Tong <hubert.reinterpretcast at gmail.com> writes: > > > The update process in Phab in rather manual and it does lead to more > noise. > > The GitHub force push risks loss of context for earlier comments (not > just > > in terms of display, like viewing older comments

The Pygments highlighter supports many more languages than CodeRay. Pygments is written in Python, but I''ve seen non-Python projects use it (Jekyll, Pygments). There''s also this: https://github.com/nex3/rb-pygments Any idea how much work it would be to add Pygments support to Webgen?

Dear R Help, is someone going to write a R/S language lexer for the Pygments Python syntax highlighter <http://pygments.org/>? As it is used now by Trac, Django, or the Python documentation tool Sphinx, the R community can apply it in Python-based Wikis like Moinmoin and others. Hans Werner

LKP framework can guarantee that all the software environment are same on AMD and INTEL platform. INTEL platform always work well, after revert this patch, AMD works well. we tried below commit on AMD. 1) 25de7691a0e27c29c8d783a22373cc265571f5e9: bad 2) a82235843b102202766115e10003c9465a8b83ae: good the error logs(build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log) has no difference b/w 1) and 2) on AMD platform

Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > >> The latter being what GenLibDeps.pl expects to see. All else being >> equal though, it might be better to change GenLibDeps.pl to recognize >> the first version: >> --- GenLibDeps.pl (revision 78653) >> +++ GenLibDeps.pl (working copy) >> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ >> print "

Hi we observed that below errors occur on AMD platform since 25de7691a0e27c29c8d783a22373cc265571f5e9 root at lkp-opteron1 /opt/rootfs/llvm_project/src/build# cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=release -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang -G "Unix Makefiles" ../llvm -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/opt/cross/ -- clang project is enabled -- clang-tools-extra project is disabled -- compiler-rt project is disabled

Hi, afaics in manuals the llvm-{link,ld} tools only can merge bitcode files into one bigger piece which looks like a static-linking from the c/c++ world. i'm wondering is it any possibility to link bitcode elements dynamically in the same way as e.g. c#/msil assemblies? static linking into one executable looks horrible - any change in library used in project forces relinking of everything.

On Saturday 11 of February 2012 14:29:10 Paweł Sikora wrote: > Hi, > > afaics in manuals the llvm-{link,ld} tools only can merge bitcode files > into one bigger piece which looks like a static-linking from the c/c++ world. > i'm wondering is it any possibility to link bitcode elements dynamically > in the same way as e.g. c#/msil assemblies? static linking into one

On 9/10/07, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Bill Wendling wrote: > > When I compile the following program with llvm-gcc on Mac x86, it segfaults: > > However, if I compile it to a .s file and then compile it with gcc, it > > works fine: > > This is weird. Anyone have an idea of what's going on? > > They are probably

Could anybody provide me some links or pages or infos of the difference of bitcodes of C and C++? We have implemented an optimization pass on bitcode generated from C, and we are trying to find out whether it will work on bitcode from C++. Thanks! -- Best Regards, Fei Jia -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Cucumberists (and RSpec Classic users ;): How can we convert a Cucumber feature file into HTML with syntax highlighting? Not the test-runner output; that''s preprocessed so it does not match the input file... Tx! -- Phlip

Ah, ok, apt-get remove libldb1 ldb-tools Then try again : apt install samba winbind acl The replacement of libldb1 to libldb2 is missing something. I'll have a look at that. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Lmloge [mailto:lmloge at orange.fr] > Verzonden: vrijdag 20 december 2019 13:15 > Aan: L.P.H. van Belle > CC: samba at lists.samba.org