similar to: [LLVMdev] clang code-completion question

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dmitry Frank <dimon.frank at gmail.com> Date: 2012/11/28 Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] clang code-completion question To: Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> Cc: "cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu Developers" <cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu> Hello, Nick! Thank you for your reply. Regarding to pointers to functions: look at this code: static void

Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote on 16.03.2015 17:56:20: > If you want to do it at a clang level, the right thing to do is to > fixup the ABI lowerings for pointers to keep them pointers in this case. > So this is an artifact of the way that we pass structures, and > constructing a general solution at the ABI level might be tricky. > I've cc'd Uli, who did most

Hi, I have the following C loop to vectorize: struct box { double* source; }; void test(double* restrict result, struct box my_struct, int len) { for (int i=0 ; i<len; i++) { result[i] = my_struct.source[i] * my_struct.source[i]; } } There are two references in the loop, result[i] (restrict) and my_struct.source[i] (readonly). The compiler should easily figure out that

hello ( and sorry for my poor english ... ) I'm a newbie on R software and I need to obtain this kind of system : a structure, like a liste : my_struct <- list() my_struct$a <- a_value my_struct$b <- another_value my_struct$c <- one_more_value and a function with two args : the first is a instance of the structure, and the second is any component of the structure (here $a, $b

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:54 PM Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:39 PM Olivier H Sallenave <ohsallen at us.ibm.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have the following C loop to vectorize: >> >> struct box { >> double* source; >> }; >> >> void test(double* restrict result, struct box

Hi, I am trying to figure out how to read arguments of a call instruction. I had few questions based on that I have the following C Code 1 #include <stdio.h> 2 3 struct my_struct 4 { 5 int a; 6 int b; 7 }; 8 9 struct my_struct abc; 10 void p_ptr ( unsigned long j) 11 { 12 printf ( "%lx \n", j ); 13 } 14 15 void struct_ptr ( struct my_struct *

On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:34 PM Olivier Sallenave <ol.sall at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Thanks for your feedback. I would prefer not to write a new AA. Can't we > directly implement that traversal in BasicAA? > Can I ask why? Outside of the "well, it's another pass", i mean? BasicAA is stateless, so you can't cache, and you really don't

I'm having trouble getting my backend to properly treat the situation where a char* is converted into a struct, i.e. something like: char* pointer_representation = ...; MyStruct* my_struct = (MyStruct*) pointer_representation; my_struct->an_int_field = 5; When this occurs, LLVM seems to fold the struct and char* into one assembly 'object', which is perfectly fine. However, it also

Hi Shankha, > 24 p_ptr ((unsigned long)&abc); > call void @p_ptr(i64 ptrtoint (%struct.my_struct* @abc to i64)) > nounwind, !dbg !31 > > Q.1 At line no 24 I try to read the address of global variable abc. > The address is type casted > from struct * to int * for which ptrtoint. I guess you mean "is type casted from struct * to unsigned

On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Stephen McGruer <stephen.mcgruer at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm having trouble getting my backend to properly treat the situation where > a char* is converted into a struct, i.e. something like: > > char* pointer_representation = ...; > MyStruct* my_struct = (MyStruct*) pointer_representation; > my_struct->an_int_field = 5; > >

Hi Duncan, Thanks for pointing out my mistake. I will reword my questions. //C code int var1; //global int a, b; foo(a, b); bar(c); generates following //LLVM IR %1 = load a; %2 = load b; call foo(%1, %2) call bar(@var1) CallInst.getOperand(1).getNameStr() on foo, returns null, but on bar returns var1. Similarly, for call void @p_ptr(i64 ptrtoint (%struct.my_struct* @abc to i64)) nounwind,

I am trying to call a precompiled C function that uses a struct as one of it's arguments. I could write a wrapper function in C, but I was hoping there is some way to pack fields into an array of type raw that could be passed directly to the function. Here is some more detail. The C struct is simple, but has mixed types: struct STRUCT1 { long type; long nx; double

> How did you do it without the pragma? I understood that the problem was a mismatch between the the declaration and definition in for some codebooks (exc_*_tables.c). > I saw you added the pragmas to disable the float/double warnings to misc.h > though that header isn't included by the files that generate the warnings. What are the offending files then? BTW, aside from the

Hi, I have been watching the vim/clang autocompletion in utils/vim/vimrc for a while. What is the status of this work? The last information I got is, that there where still some patches missing, but this was before the clang-2.8. Any updates? Is it supposed to work with clang-2.8? Thanks Tobi

On Oct 21, 2010, at 2:11 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote: > Hi, > > I have been watching the vim/clang autocompletion in utils/vim/vimrc for a while. What is the status of this work? The last information I got is, that there where still some patches missing, but this was before the clang-2.8. > Any updates? Is it supposed to work with clang-2.8? It requires a clang patch, which I

I was wondering if anyone already had completion files for samba utils like 'net' wbinfo...etc... I can never remember all the params, I keep wanting to hit <tab> to autocomplete for options like I can on many other sys utils. So I started looking at examples of existing completion files and started cobbling one together... if no one else has some (which would be great!), I'll

Hi lld developers, As a GSoC student I wrote static ld.lld auto-completion scripts for zsh and bash shell because it doesn't have much options and flags for dynamic completion. Whether I send pr to zsh-completion/bash-completion package or open phabricator review for them? Also gnu ld has already autocompletion for bash shell but l am not merging ld and lld completion scripts to one file

If you could point me towards the correct location in the standard I would appreciate that - I didn't realize it wasn't acceptable to turn pointer-data to structs. My example is reduced from the EEMBC benchmarks where I ran into the problem, so I may have reduced it too far by accident (but I'm fairly sure they do not use __attribute__ or similar). Adding a

Hello, All. First, I want to thank Ian Malone and Ralph Giles, thanks for your kind replies. But I still have problems about seek. As you suggested, I could use ov_open_callbacks() to supply my own read/write/seek functions. So, can you give me an example? I?m sorry for my ignorance, because I haven?t used callbacks before. I analyzed the vorbisfile.c in Tremor, and I think I

Hi, I needing to modify the control.js file and am confused about what the purpose of the getToken function is. I read the docs section below and still don''t understand why it doesn''t just access the form.value directly. Docs say: This method should get the text for which to provide autocompletion by invoking this.getToken(), NOT by directly accessing this.element.value. This is