similar to: [LLVMdev] A Question about LLVM-backend

Hi 조영필, > I want to manipulate LLVM-backend to emit other compiler's IR, in this case, > VPO's IR. > So, what i want to know is.. Is there a project to be referred? (For example, > "Do LLVM-backend -> GIMPLE" project exist?) as far as I know there is no LLVM IR -> gimple pass. LLVM used to have a C backend that turned LLVM IR into C. I think it was removed

On 13/09/12 10:57, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi 조영필, > > > I want to manipulate LLVM-backend to emit other compiler's IR, in this case, >> VPO's IR. >> So, what i want to know is.. Is there a project to be referred? (For example, >> "Do LLVM-backend -> GIMPLE" project exist?) > > as far as I know there is no LLVM IR -> gimple pass. LLVM

Hello, I?m trying to install PIL (Python Image Library) in a CentOS-4.4, but I?m getting the follow error after unpack the tarball: ------------------------------- # python setup.py install running install running build running build_py creating build creating build/lib.linux-i686-2.3 copying PIL/ExifTags.py -> build/lib.linux-i686-2.3 copying PIL/ImageTransform.py ->

Hi, Would you able to advise me to configure openssh running on Redhat linux ver7? Thanks. Best Regards _______________________ Joseph Keow

Dear all, Suppose I have this data frame: > data_main V1 V2 foo 13.1 bar 12.0 qux 10.4 cho 20.33 pox 8.21 And I want to split the data into two parts first part are the one contain in the source array: > src [1] "bar" "pox" and the other one the complement. In the end we hope to get this two dataframes: > data_child1 V1 V2 bar 13.1 pox

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Devang Patel wrote: > On Jul 31, 2006, at 11:14 AM, Vikram Adve wrote: >> Does llvmgcc4 convert the high-level AST to LLVM (like llvmgcc3x) or does >> it go from GIMPL to LLVM? If the latter, would it be possible to allow >> some TreeSSA optimizations before emitting LLVM? > llvmgcc4 intercepts high-level GCC trees to GIMPLE tree transformation

> Hi, Check if the shared directory has the write permission for all. i.e. chmod 777 for the particular directory > Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 21:06:36 -0700 > From: Kenny Cho <Kenny.Cho@Corp.Sun.COM> > To: samba@samba.org > Subject: Problem copying files to samba mount. > Message-ID: <37E5B2CC.9ADC9F8A@ha1pal.corp.sun.com> > MIME-Version: 1.0 >

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97066 Bug ID: 97066 Summary: Blank screen when starting KMS on a GTX970 for kernel 4.6 series Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 22, 2010, at 10:29 AM, Jianzhou Zhao wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Does LLVM have passes that do translations between GCC RTL and LLVM >> SSA, RTL -> SSA and SSA -> RTL? > > Nope.  There has been some talk about doing a Clang -> RTL or LLVM IR -> RTL backend, to

On Jul 31, 2006, at 11:14 AM, Vikram Adve wrote: > Does llvmgcc4 convert the high-level AST to LLVM (like llvmgcc3x) > or does it go from GIMPL to LLVM? If the latter, would it be > possible to allow some TreeSSA optimizations before emitting LLVM? llvmgcc4 intercepts high-level GCC trees to GIMPLE tree transformation routines to get trees that are suitable for LLVM byte code.

Does llvmgcc4 convert the high-level AST to LLVM (like llvmgcc3x) or does it go from GIMPL to LLVM? If the latter, would it be possible to allow some TreeSSA optimizations before emitting LLVM? --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ On Jul 31, 2006, at 1:10 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > llvmgcc4 emits LLVM byte code before executing GCC optimizations, > so one

Hi, I need a relatively simple image api for the app I''m writing. I need to copy photos, rename them, and re-size them to put them in a standard format. I tried using RMagick/Imagemagick, but the photos would be corrupted on re-size, so I''m looking for some suggestions. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 04:27, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hopefully this is feasible, as I said I didn't work on > it yet. It sounds doable, but I'm not sure why would you want to convert the gimple into LLVM bitcode, if you are already saving LLVM bitcode in the file. Wouldn't you be just duplicating code? Diego.

At our facility we have multiple sample points that are sampled on any given day. What I would like to do is create a map of the facility with the sample points (and point labels) and when we have out of specification results, place a transparent dot over the area on the map. As the number of OOS results builds up, I envision the dot getting darker. Are there any packages out there that can aid

Dear All, I am trying to understand the process followed for converting GIMPLE IR to LLVM IR in LLVM-GCC/DragonEgg - more importantly conversion of OpenMP extended GIMPLE IR to LLVM IR. It would be great if anybody points me to some documentation before I my-self delve into the understanding of related source code. -- Cheers -mahesha -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment

On 01/01/2013 02:45 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > >> >> In our compiler we use a modified version LLVM Polly, which is very >> sensitive to >> proper code generation. Among the number of limitations, the loop region >> (enclosed by phi node on induction variable and branch) is required to >> be free >> of additional memory-dependent

Dear R users, I'm new of the R, I really don't know much. I want classification some data (two class, many features and huge size of data) by using R. At this case, I want using Support Vector Machine, Bayes theory based classifier, Discriminant Analysis, Regression based at least. Which package should I using, and can I compare each classifier result by predictions? Thank you.

Hi Diego, >> Hopefully this is feasible, as I said I didn't work on >> it yet. > > It sounds doable, but I'm not sure why would you want to convert the > gimple into LLVM bitcode, if you are already saving LLVM bitcode in > the file. Wouldn't you be just duplicating code? here I was thinking of the possibility that some files have been compiled with -flto but

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1206 Bug ID: 1206 Summary: segfault when snat map rule has been added Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

Hi Dmitry, > > In our compiler we use a modified version LLVM Polly, which is very sensitive to > proper code generation. Among the number of limitations, the loop region > (enclosed by phi node on induction variable and branch) is required to be free > of additional memory-dependent branches. In other words, there must be no > conditional "br" instructions below phi