similar to: [LLVMdev] error: terminator in the middle of basic block

Hello, I want to run SPEC2000 benchmark in LLVM to check correctness of a llvm module which I wrote. How to run SPEC2000 benchmark in LLVM? Unnikrishnan C -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

Hi Unnikrishnan C, On 18/01/13 09:09, unni_c at csa.iisc.ernet.in wrote: > Hello, > > I want to run SPEC2000 benchmark in LLVM to check correctness of a llvm > module which I wrote. How to run SPEC2000 benchmark in LLVM? > > Unnikrishnan C do you know how to run LLVM's nightly testsuite? It has support for SPEC. When you configure LLVM you need to use --with-externals to

Hi, The checking about that if this is a terminator that it is at the end of the block has been applied twice (bellow). One is at Verifier::visitInstruction, and the other is at Verifier::visitTerminatorInst. Since visitInstruction is called when visiting each instruction, the checking at visitTerminatorInst seems redundant to me. Did I miss any case? void Verifier::visitInstruction(Instruction

On Dec 3, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Adam Preuss wrote: > I am a student at the University of Alberta under the > supervision of José Nelson Amaral, and I have been working on > implementing path profiling into LLVM. I have completed my project > and would like to submit it. > > We are looking for a reviewer for the path profiling implementation. We > have sent previous requests

Thank you for your suggestions on the patch. If the patch is committed, I would be willing to maintain it, though I am not sure what is all involved or how I am made aware of changes that need to be made. The technical report https://www.cs.ualberta.ca/system/files/tech_report/2010/PreussPathProfLLVM.pdf contains my benchmarks relating to profiling overhead in LLVM. Over the next week I will

Hi, On 04/19/2013 09:40 AM, Unnikrishnan C wrote: > access to memory locations. > > example > suppose we have > A[ind1[i]=expr; (s1) > and A1[i]=A[ind2[i]] (s2) > > to find what is the probability for RAW dependence from s1-->s2 and WAR > dependence from s2--->s1 and WAW dependence from s1-->s1 > There exists the

Alright, I'm ready to nuke it. Last chance to say stop. For context of others, this has come up repeatedly: no one we know of is using EdgeProfiling.cpp, PathProfiling.cpp, and the lib/Analysis/Profile*Pass.cpp collection of tools. They haven't been updated since 2012 when Alastair Murray looked into this stuff, and both current efforts towards PGO are essentially *totally* different

----------------- Hello, I want to do a memory dependence profiling. Is there any freely available implementation of memory dependence profiling implementations in LLVM which I can modify for my own use? Unnikrishnan C -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

BTW, this will also remove the entire 'runtime' directory in the LLVM repository. Runtime libraries are now being developed in compiler-rt. That is where the GCDA profiling runtime already lives and any new instrumentation based profiling runtime would also likely live there. If the code in the existing runtime tree is needed to start building those, they can always be found in the VCS

Hi, I am a student at IIT Kanpur. I am working on Path Profiling, i just came with a need to know about the number of static paths in a program(actually in a function) before it's actually get run. As i saw in PathProfiling.c file in llvm\runtime\libprofile they are just storing the path information at run time and dynamically adding entries for the new path. But i need to know the number of

Hi , I am facing a strange problem .I am unable to install CentOS 4.0 on my HP DL145 G2 Server .I am getting the following error RAMDISK: couldn't find valid RAM disk image starting at 0. Please append correct "root=" boot option VFS: cannot open root device "<NULL>" or unknown-block (3,3) Kernal panic - not syncing VFS unable to mount root fs however CentOS 3.5

Hi, I am a student at IIT Kanpur. I am working on Path Profiling, i just came with a need to know about the number of static paths in a program(actually in a function) before it's actually get run. As i saw in PathProfiling.c file in llvm\runtime\libprofile they are just storing the path information at run time and dynamically adding entries for the new path. But i need to know the number of

Hi Could any one tell me about how to create our own class , where to put it and how to access that class in controller Thanks in advance Unnikrishnan -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email

Chandler Carruth wrote: >Alright, I'm ready to nuke it. Last chance to say stop. Stop. >For context of others, this has come up repeatedly: no one we know of is >using EdgeProfiling.cpp, PathProfiling.cpp, and the >lib/Analysis/Profile*Pass.cpp collection of tools. We've been actively using it since at least 2.8. True, we haven't been vocal about it. While I can see

Hi guys, I am trying to perform edge profiling using on hello.bc file by using following command opt -insert-edge-profiling hello.bc -o hello-edge.bc but I get the error that option "-insert-edge-profiling" is unknown. Can you please help me to solve the issue. Please note that I am following the paper available at this link http://llvm.org/pubs/2010-12-Preuss-PathProfiling.pdf

Ram, I sent https://review.gluster.org/17765 to fix the possibility in bulk removexattr. But I am not sure if this is indeed the reason for this issue. On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Ankireddypalle Reddy <areddy at commvault.com> wrote: > Thanks for the swift turn around. Will try this out and let you know. > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > Ram > > *From:*

Good evening, guys! I suppose mingw build would be stable, though, I would like some patches to be picked up. * RC1 LLVM and clang can be built on either msys/autoconf, msys/cmake and mingw/cmake. By CMake, all tests can run but 37 of LLVM and 5 of clang tests would fail. On mingw by configure tests cannot be executed. [PR9505] For compiling, I saw a warning, in llvm-bcanalyzer.cpp. (fixed in

Hi, Zhao You can apply the attachment to LLVM 2.9 Release. It has been tested on FreeBSD/x86. Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.) Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667 -------------- next part -------------- diff -ruN llvm-2.9/CMakeLists.txt llvm-2.9.new/CMakeLists.txt --- llvm-2.9/CMakeLists.txt 2011-03-02

I wanted to generate code for ia64 machine with instructions such as speculative load(ld.s) and checks(chk.s) using llvm .Does the LLVM currently uses these instructions when generating code for ia64?.If not how to generate code using these instructions? Unnikrishnan C -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

Sub:-code added by my path profiler module not executing with llvm-gcc -03 When compile with llvm-gcc -O3 the path profile result shows frequency count of zero for all paths ins some functions I have four functions insert,delete,print and main. It prints correct values for delete's and main's paths and zero values for print's and insert's paths. This problem occurs only with