Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Last Known Good Builds?"
2012 Nov 05
0
[LLVMdev] Last Known Good Builds?
> Why is the LKG build so important? Because in software development in
> general, you want to reduce the "granularity" of the process as much as
> possible, approximating a kurve rather than a series of steps. If people
> adopt LLVM v3.1 and then have to wait one year for another update (v3.2) in
> which LOTS and LOTS of things have changed, they are in for a tough ride
2012 Nov 05
1
[LLVMdev] Last Known Good Builds?
| Do you have any information about how people are setting up their
| projects? I ask because there are different ways to set up a project
| to depend on LLVM.
No, I don't have that kind of information. All I know is that it is quite
difficult to find a working version on the trunk. I think this especially
hit those that are new to LLVM and yet want to play around with the
bleeding edge
2012 May 24
3
[LLVMdev] Minor correction to the Visual Studio documentation/Windows support in general
>
> the problem is that very few LLVM developers use or know anything about
> Windows.
> The only way for this to change is for people who do know and care about
> Windows
> to step forward, work on improving Windows support, and contribute their
> Windows
> viewpoint to design discussions etc.
>
As it is now, Windows users will quite likely drop LLVM because of the
2012 May 24
0
[LLVMdev] Minor correction to the Visual Studio documentation/Windows support in general
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote:
> One project I'd like to complete pretty soon is to go through the build
> instructions, for mingw32, and see if I can't somehow create a mingw64
> build. I believe the 32-bit platform is dying by the hour so I'm rather
> eager to have a mingw64 version of LLVM/Clang. Also, I'd love
2013 Apr 30
1
[LLVMdev] Instruction Scheduling - migration from v3.1 to v3.2
On Apr 26, 2013, at 3:53 AM, Martin J. O'Riordan <Martin.ORiordan at movidius.com> wrote:
> I am migrating the llvm/clang derived compiler for our processor from the
> v3.1 to v3.2 codebase. This has mostly gone well except that instruction
> latency scheduling is no longer happening.
>
> The people who implemented this previously sub-classed 'ScheduleDAGInstrs'
2008 Feb 27
3
domU on v3.2 is not booting
hi all,
I installed v3.2 from source and now dom0 is booting well. But when I
tried to start domU it shows the following error message and seems
hanging.
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
EXT3-fs warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended
EXT3 FS on hda1, internal journal
device-mapper: ioctl: 4.7.0-ioctl (2006-06-24) initialised:
dm-devel@redhat.com
2013 Dec 01
2
[LLVMdev] "Mapping High-Level Constructs to LLVM IR" Github URL
I'm glad you see the potential of this document. It is very important that
everybody joins in and add their pennies so that the document eventually
reflects the real experience of people who have actually tried and studied
these things, and who are familiar with LLVM IR from using and implementing
it for a long time.
I sort of hope that this document will one day cover almost all LLVM IR
2013 Dec 01
0
[LLVMdev] "Mapping High-Level Constructs to LLVM IR" Github URL
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote:
> I'm glad you see the potential of this document. It is very important
> that everybody joins in and add their pennies so that the document
> eventually reflects the real experience of people who have actually tried
> and studied these things, and who are familiar with LLVM IR from using and
2011 May 12
1
geo-replication issue
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20110512/765c02a7/attachment.html>
2018 Jun 08
4
Samba Time Synchronisation wikipage
I have update the Time Synchronisation Wikipage:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Time_Synchronisation
It now includes information for the 'chrony' time server.
If you spot any errors or omissions, or if you think that something
could be said better, please report back ;-)
Could I also thank Louis Van Belle for proofreading the page.
Rowland
2012 May 28
3
[LLVMdev] liblibclang.dll?
Hi,
I accidentally noticed the following line when building LLVM and Clang on
Windows 7 x64 using Mingw64:
Linking CXX shared library ..\..\..\..\bin\liblibclang.dll
"Liblib" seems a bit overkill. FYI.
BTW, for those who happen to search on LLVM, Clang, Windows, and Mingw64:
The v3.1 release does NOT build with Mingw64. I believe this has been
fixed in the Subversion sources as
2012 Jun 13
5
[LLVMdev] Anybody translating the LLVM FAQ from HTML to Sphinx?
That reminds me: Do the web documents reside in a repository somewhere or
should I just grab them using wget?
2012/6/14 Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org>
> wrote:
> > If nobody else is doing it, I can translate the FAQ into Sphinx as I'd
> like
> > to begin gradually extending
2013 Nov 29
10
[LLVMdev] "Mapping High-Level Constructs to LLVM IR" Github URL
Hi,
It will probably take a few weeks or a month before the "Mapping High-Level
Constructs to LLVM IR" document is ready for prime time. Until then, you
can review and study it at this URL:
https://github.com/archfrog/llvm-doc/blob/master/MappingHighLevelConstructsToLLVMIR.rst
Please notice that I specifically do not advocate reviewing the document
for a week or two. But feel free
2013 Dec 09
2
[LLVMdev] GNU LLD build error? Seems that Clang likes LLD just fine.
We should make LLD to be able to build with GCC even if GCC is a bit buggy.
So you wrote that it's no longer build because of the recent change of
makeArrayRef removal? I think it's my change (r196475).
Can you confirm that you can build if you revert that change? If it has
caused the build with GCC to break, we should roll it back.
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Mikael Lyngvig
2013 Nov 21
2
[LLVMdev] Quad-Core ARMv7 Build Slave Seeks Noble Purpose
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote:
> Hi Renato,
>
> My XU is on build 141 and there hasn't been a single problem yet. No
> reboots, no crashes, and as far as I have observed no core dropouts (after
> I did the cpu-freq trick you sent me). Perhaps I have a stable board or
> perhaps it is because of its revision (rev. 0.3)?
2012 Jun 13
0
[LLVMdev] Anybody translating the LLVM FAQ from HTML to Sphinx?
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote:
> That reminds me: Do the web documents reside in a repository somewhere or
> should I just grab them using wget?
The website is at http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/www/trunk/ . The
llvm docs are in llvm/docs.
Which actually makes me wonder if the LLVM-project FAQ (in reference
to Chandler's post in
2009 Sep 30
2
aproximate a titration kurve to the measure data.
Halo
i'm studying chemistry, today we made an experiment and i have to draw a
titration kurve for my mess data. we can do it on a mm paper, or we can also
use a programe. people from chemistry recomend "R"
last year i studied civil eng. and we used Matlab, as I see, R ist very
similar to it, but its got other comands.
But i think R would be a good help for some exercises.
so my
2013 Nov 17
2
[LLVMdev] Quad-Core ARMv7 Build Slave Seeks Noble Purpose
It wouldn't take me more than an hour or two to do the format conversion.
It is rather trivial, actually. Just say the word and I'm on to it like a
starving bee. I guess I should get used to using the Sphinx layout; I'm
simply more familiar with the format I use on my own websites.
Have you guys ever considered making a less formal wiki for LLVM
documentation - a place where tiny
2013 Nov 17
2
[LLVMdev] Quad-Core ARMv7 Build Slave Seeks Noble Purpose
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org>wrote:
>
>> It wouldn't take me more than an hour or two to do the format conversion.
>> It is rather trivial, actually. Just say the word and I'm on to it like a
>> starving bee. I
2013 Nov 17
2
[LLVMdev] Quad-Core ARMv7 Build Slave Seeks Noble Purpose
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote:
> http://llvm.lyngvig.org/Articles/How-to-Setup-an-Arch-Linux-Buildbot-for-LLVM
> Notice: You only need Ninja for the test build; none of the official LLVM builders use Ninja as far as I know.
My buildbots use ninja.
> Please notice that you must specify the absolute path to ninja, otherwise CMake